GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
There is literally a page of complicated programming code and instruction just to install Java! What kind of a jerk would make a program so hard to install?! Would it really take that much effort to add some automation to the installation?! Ugg I'm so pissed right now!
There is literally a page of complicated programming code and instruction just to install Shockwave! What kind of a jerk would make a program so hard to install?! Would it really take that much effort to add some automation to the installation?! Ugg I'm so pissed right now!
Yup, it could be. And I'm sure if there was enough demand for it, they'd package it up in a nice GUI installer. However, the simple RPM/self-extractor model works fine for most users, and especially for people installing Java on X-less servers. It keeps things clean, simple, and to the point. No unnecessary fluff and dependencies.
However, I can see your point. Here's a link to Sun's Web Site Feedback page. Why not drop a note to someone who may actually have some control over the matter?
Originally posted by AlexV Yup, it could be. And I'm sure if there was enough demand for it, they'd package it up in a nice GUI installer. However, the simple RPM/self-extractor model works fine for most users, and especially for people installing Java on X-less servers. It keeps things clean, simple, and to the point. No unnecessary fluff and dependencies.
I finally got Java to work. I'm playing Yahoo games with it now. But still, for an average user, it can be a REAL pain. Even the terminology is complicated.
Quote:
However, I can see your point. Here's a link to Sun's Web Site Feedback page. Why not drop a note to someone who may actually have some control over the matter?
I certainly will. Thank you for the link.
And thank you for your links and information also, Craigevil.
I'm sorry again for the outburst. Linux has been giving me so much hell. As soon as I get my last problem fixed, I should finally be able to have some peace with this OS. But damn the people who make their programs so damn hard to install!
I made a comment on this very issue in the Interview section on these forums, with Mandrake 10 coming out in 4 CDs you'd think they would include Java & Flash but no you have to pay for that!
Having said that I installed Suse 9.2 from a Linux Format Magazine Disk and that included both Java and Flash in the default set-up. I was very nearly tempted to switch entirely to Suse except that Mandrake has more games.
But in essence I agree with Cinematography, these free plugins shouldn't be that much grief, and I object to Mandrake including them on the pay-for version but not the download version.
Ah the advantages of using Debian. Both Flash and Java install by simply using apt-get install or by using Synaptic. No compiling or problems installing. Same for Real Player and Adobe and Mplayer.
The issue with the extra disk in Mandrake probably has to do with licensing issues with Sun and Macromedia.
Originally posted by craigevil Ah the advantages of using Debian. Both Flash and Java install by simply using apt-get install or by using Synaptic. No compiling or problems installing. Same for Real Player and Adobe and Mplayer.
The issue with the extra disk in Mandrake probably has to do with licensing issues with Sun and Macromedia.
If installing programs with Debian is so much easier, why isn't it more popular? I'm asking because I don't know and fully understand. I've never used Debian before. Can it also handle .rpm packages?
Originally posted by Cinematography If installing programs with Debian is so much easier, why isn't it more popular? I'm asking because I don't know and fully understand. I've never used Debian before. Can it also handle .rpm packages?
it is extremely popular, both as standard Debian, and as the base for many other distros (ubuntu, knoppix, etc.)
yes you could use .rpms, but the normal practice is to use .deb files, used by default with apt.
Originally posted by Genesee it is extremely popular, both as standard Debian, and as the base for many other distros (ubuntu, knoppix, etc.)
yes you could use .rpms, but the normal practice is to use .deb files, used by default with apt.
Thanks. I was asking because I saw it ranked #6 under some other distros on http://distrowatch.com/ . Ubuntu is #1 though. Too bad it doesn't have KDE. GUI is EVERYTHING to me. I guess I could always try Kubuntu.
slackware's much better about this sort of thing.. you get java and flash if you want them.. right from the cds. debian requires some convincing, meaning, of course, reconfiguration.
rpm is a shitty package format and there's no getting around it. they're only as popular as they are because of redhat's corporate friendliness that no other distro has been able to acheive or cared about.
Originally posted by DaWallace slackware's much better about this sort of thing.. you get java and flash if you want them.. right from the cds. debian requires some convincing, meaning, of course, reconfiguration.
rpm is a shitty package format and there's no getting around it. they're only as popular as they are because of redhat's corporate friendliness that no other distro has been able to acheive or cared about.
LOL. You may have a point. I'm download Debian based Kubuntu right now. Hopefully this will be the OS I've been longing for.
While "Debian" is only number 6 at DistroWatch, many distros are Debian based including Ubuntu, Mepis, Linspire, Xandros, Knoppix, Kanotix, Puppy, Feather and many others. Out of the top ten 5 are Debian based distros. "Software distributions based on Debian" http://www.debian.org/misc/children-distros
And we can't leave out: Xebian is an Xbox-enabled version of the Debian GNU/Linux distribution. It is based on the standard x86 Debian, but the install process - and naturally the bootloader, the kernel and the kernel modules - are all customized for the Xbox." http://www.xbox-linux.org/Xebian Finally a good use for an Xbox.
Installing Flash consisted of opening a terminal and typing apt-get install flash
Java wasn't much harder. Plus there is always the Synaptic Package Manager.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.