GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I might be in the minority, but I actually like the show.
It's just that anytime I see them using Kali I let out a very audible sigh... I just know I'm going to come on here the next day and see something in the Newbie forum like:
Kali is actually a very good tool if you're using it right.
Unlike others it only bundles the basics without adding "dangerous" scripts as others do.
Further more it's both Debian based and semi supported (you'll find many Debian people in their core team).
What I don't get is why it's suddenly used as a script-kiddie tool.
It's meant as an educational tool and doesn't even offer the "easy-cracking" stuff for modern systems (all of its examples are based on old and already fixed Window XP flaws and the Metasploit Framework).
What I don't get is why it's suddenly used as a script-kiddie tool
I was never a script kiddie. When I was a kiddie, there was no such thing. Scripts were things actors read from.
I can say, though, that, when I was a kiddie, I did not always research things thoroughly before I did them, like driving 100 mph on country roads late at night and TPing my 10th Grade English teacher's front yard (I am still glad I did that, too).
I doubt kiddies have changed all that much over the years.
I was never a script kiddie. When I was a kiddie, there was no such thing. Scripts were things actors read from.
I can say, though, that, when I was a kiddie, I did not always research things thoroughly before I did them, like driving 100 mph on country roads late at night and TPing my 10th Grade English teacher's front yard (I am still glad I did that, too).
I doubt kiddies have changed all that much over the years.
(I did do one thing right. I didn't get caught.)
Well yes, kids will always be kids.
Being a kid (in what's starting to look like a different time dimension), I did stupid things as well (and sadly got caught a few times).
... however ... I did took the time to learn the correct tools (in those days, cracking a system mostly meant using something silly as (a modified) telnet, security was almost non-existing).
Did the speeding thing as well.
Bought a Vespa "Special", knowing I could just remove a screw to make it 4 times faster (their engines where originally made for highway bikes).
Kali isn't and will never try to be a malicious cracking tool.
It's a zillion times easier to use existing and publicly available scripts for whatever system you're using.
PS: Just watched some episodes from that MrRobot show, and his most used "cracking" tool appears to be plain old wget.
IMHO, their seem to be many people using a fictional tv show to sell books(even O'Reilly) and other media, abusing Kali for something it simply can't do.
Advice on saying: not the [best] place for a Kali [beginner]
How might I politely/properly say: "not here" to like this (plus: Simply Goo...: kali cellphone)
I suspect that referring them to #11 here (
!) wouldn't be 'ok'.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.