I was reading the interview of Mr. Tourrilhes and something struck me, copied and pasted is the question.
LQ) Recently, a hotly debated question has been: "When will Linux be ready for the desktop?". When do you see that happening (or has it already)? and what do you see as 802.11*'s place in that?
The answer was a bit longer so I wont paste it in...but what struck me as interesting was the comment that Linux nor any other OS is ready for the desktop, ie the public. I am fortunate/unfortunate (pick one) to work a job where I field calls from the public all day to troubleshoot various issues, rarely advanced ones. I work for a broadband company, and probably 80% of the calls recieved are M$ issues, software related. This includes spyware, adware, AOL software problems, OE, etc. And naturally the company only supports IE and M$ and OE...
My question is, how much of this would be a problem if computer sellers, Dell, Gateway, HP, Compaq, etc, sold computers with prepackaged, functioning Linux OSes?
The general public seems very adept at trashing microsofts various OSes, and it seems, considering the public, who arent advanced users, would be better suited with a stabler OS that had less flaws and was less vulnerable to worms and such. This would of course require makers to publish drivers for hardware on easy installer cds(
)....among other things, but it seems the public buys whatever they see in the store.....im rambling now...
I also want to mention default settings on IE like (Enable third party browser extensions) ugh