LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 03-04-2004, 07:17 PM   #1
thegeekster
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: USA (Pacific coast)
Distribution: Vector 5.8-SOHO, FreeBSD 6.2
Posts: 513

Rep: Reputation: 34
TechWorld.com: Inspired by the RIAA, SCO prepares Linux crusade


Inspired by the RIAA, SCO prepares Linux crusade
Will continue to sue Linux users, aggressively.

By Kieren McCarthy, Techworld

SCO is to embark on a RIAA-style crusade against Linux end users, the company announced today, in order to make consumers "fully aware" of its copyrights.

Giving a press conference following the news that it had lodged a lawsuit, for the first time, against a Linux user the car parts company AutoZone, the company's CEO Darl McBride drew several comparisons with the American music industry's trade body decision to sue individuals for downloading copyrighted MP3s.

Before the RIAA started suing individuals, McBride argued, "end users had not considered their use." Now he says, SCO "will take and continue to take" legal action against end users of Linux, until people recognise that the Linux operating system contains copyrighted material that SCO owns.

The company was going to "re-educate" people about its rights and it expected to see the same fall in illegal usage that the RIAA has seen after its actions.

At the same time, McBride announced the company had lodged a second lawsuit in Oakland against DaimlerChrysler for "failure to respond" to SCO's demand that the company provide a certificate of compliance with its software licensing agreement.

McBride later admitted that the DaimlerChrysler suit was based on the company's contribution toward Linux and that it was continuing to work on the open-source OS. "They need to confirm one way or another," McBride stated.

In an earlier statement about the group's slipping financial results, the company's philosophy and future plans were made starkly clear. In response to falling revenues, only one answer was forthcoming - increased enforcement of copyrights and IP property rights.

SCO has caught the legal bug and it is making it quite clear that anyone who even touches Linux is fair game in its eyes. Why DaimlerChrysler and AutoZone? The company refused to say exactly, only that they were "at the head of the class of end users" that the company was after.

It also refused to discuss any future lawsuits, any future targets, whether they would be in the US, Europe or Asia, who the witnesses would be, or what the exact legal arguments were.

McBride said SCO has built a war chest and was going after the "significant" financial value of its intellectual property rights.

In response to the in-depth refutation of SCO's copyright claims, posted over the Internet, McBride said he would not get into the "x,y,z" of the case and that it was "best left to the courtroom" to decide who was right and who was wrong.

Of course, it doesn't help that the comparison with the RIAA that SCO is putting so much store in, is fundamentally flawed. No one disagreed that the music tracks being shared over the Internet were someone else's copyright. Plus the RIAA had the backing of not only the entire music industry but also most of the artists themselves.

SCO on the other hand has no friends but itself - it is even suing its own customers - and there is nothing like a consensus over SCO's rights. It is gambling its entire future on being able to get companies to back down. Which may seem extremely stupid until you consider that the company really is no more than the value of its licences anymore.

"We are not particularly thrilled at having to sue anyone but this is an educational process and we expect we will come to a resolution with end users," said McBride.

Whether that resolution is the one he expects to reach, only time, and some expensive court battles, will tell.

TechWorld.com article
 
Old 03-04-2004, 07:20 PM   #2
witeshark
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: Miami FL
Distribution: Mac OS X 10.4.11 Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
Posts: 429

Rep: Reputation: 30
See, this is exactly what I was on about in my late post last night. It's absurd!
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SCO vs Novell - SCO claims ownership to UNIX Ephracis General 5 10-02-2004 02:55 PM
TechWorld.com: SCO names first target in Linux copyright battle thegeekster General 9 03-13-2004 07:29 PM
Official text editor religious crusade thread Squall General 2 02-19-2004 10:51 AM
ESR drops a bomb. prepares to go nuclear. rshaw Linux - General 3 08-25-2003 10:20 AM
RIAA secretly purchased SCO and sent them a PR whizkid to help out. macewan General 2 05-08-2003 05:22 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:07 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration