GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
It comes with no software and you must have an internet connection to boot or use any applications. It includes only a webbrowser.
This way it's impossible for you to hack as you must have a subscription and log in, as well as all source code is on Microsoft servers and all you ever see is the rendered Html/Css/Silverlight code.
Yes but it's windows so they thought of it first. Additionally, windows steals everything and claims it their own. Word, Quicken Clone, Tabs, Vector Graphics, C++ to C#, every windows product in existence, etc... So why not the web os? They would write their own web applications, but nothing would be original.
lumak, you forgot the most basic element "Windows" in your list. Windows is a ripoff of the Macintosh GUI which was a ripoff of Xerox PARC's original GUI.
And the codename I'm pretty sure is 100% probable is:
I would say, just to sum it all up, maybe we should stick with a single word for a code name (I'm thinking "Windoze Taboo" [or also maybe "Windoze Forbidden"]).
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.