LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 01-15-2004, 12:53 PM   #1
cmf5150
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Fairfield, NY
Distribution: Mac OS X, Red Hat/Fedora
Posts: 18

Rep: Reputation: 0
Question SpyWare - Linux/UNIX system vulnerable?


This is actually a Mac OS X question, but since OS X is UNIX, network vulnerabilities should be similar.

I am an intern for ITS at Hamilton College and am currently involved in an anti-spyware project. We have done extensive testing on Windows versions of anti spyware and adware programs to protect our desktop computers from these problems. We want to investigate this issue on Mac OS X, which is a UNIX-based system. Are UNIX/Linux systems vulnerable to spyware/adware?

 
Old 01-15-2004, 12:59 PM   #2
Capt_Caveman
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Distribution: Fedora
Posts: 3,658

Rep: Reputation: 57
Despite it being a *nix, this is still probably more appropriate in the General Forum.

Thread moved to General
 
Old 01-16-2004, 03:37 PM   #3
SciYro
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: hopefully not here
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 2,038

Rep: Reputation: 51
every sytstem is valnerable is everyhting, its peoples job that use these systems to takes procotions (firewalls and such), but if the computer did get some bad software from somwere it shouldent be overly hard to remove (after all, its hard to hide things in linux, almost everyhitng is in file format), any software that monitors and records hard drive use shold be easly able to find when and were any such softwere is
 
Old 01-16-2004, 04:39 PM   #4
TheOneKEA
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Somewhere in Surrey
Distribution: Debian GNU/Linux 7.4.0 (amd64) w/kernel 3.13.0
Posts: 279

Rep: Reputation: 30
Not only that, the strong file/directory permissions of UNIX mean that if spyware managed to get into a properly secured system, it would only be able to infect the files of the user that it loaded as. As long as the spyware doesn't get a low/zero UID, it can't hurt anything.
 
Old 01-16-2004, 04:52 PM   #5
Nukem
Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: Canada, TO.
Distribution: Slackware: in progress, Mandrake 9.2, Libranet, Vector
Posts: 373

Rep: Reputation: 30
Why are Linux and Mac OS X safer?

First, look at the two factors that cause email viruses and worms to propagate: social engineering, and poorly designed software. Social engineering is the art of conning someone into doing something they shouldn't do, or revealing something that should be kept secret. Virus writers use social engineering to convince people to do stupid things, like open attachments that carry viruses and worms. Poorly designed software makes it easier for social engineering to take place, but such software can also subvert the efforts of a knowledgable, security-minded individual or organization. Together, the two factors can turn a single virus incident into a widespread disaster.


There is a lot more about viruses and worms. If interested read the whole article at http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/56/33226.html Since both viruses/worms and spyware are both similar in the fact that they both carry out processes in you computer that you don't want, I think this article is suitable for you.

In my opinion compared to windows, Unix is much safer because of the fact that only ediyots will use the computer as root in regular basis. Well you can't get crap on it without special permissions. Another factor is that any spyware on unix systems will easily be able detect and remove. Also I guess not using a registry helps too.
All of these topics are discuessed in the above article. Read if if you are interested.

Last edited by Nukem; 01-16-2004 at 04:59 PM.
 
Old 01-16-2004, 07:25 PM   #6
witeshark
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: Miami FL
Distribution: Mac OS X 10.4.11 Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
Posts: 429

Rep: Reputation: 30
Outstanding! I fully agree. extracted from the above article:
There is one Linux distribution that is ignoring many years of common sense, good design, and an awareness of secure operating environments in favor of a Microsoft-like deprecation of security before the nebulous term "ease of use": Lindows. By default, Lindows runs the user of the system as root (and it even encourages the user to forgo setting up a root password during installation by labeling it as "optional"!), an unbelievably shortsighted decision that results in a Linux box with the same security as a Windows 9.x machine.
Beware the false securty of Lindows! Well I never liked it as an alternative anyway. Not a true Linux!
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is all Unix & Linux system is made by C++? Lancelot1914 Programming 24 06-21-2005 04:36 PM
Is Mandrake vulnerable to viruses, worms, and spyware? wardialer Linux - Security 5 10-05-2004 11:59 PM
Linux servers were the most vulnerable????? xgreen Linux - Security 12 02-23-2004 07:55 PM
How vulnerable is Linux Vincent_Vega Linux - Security 7 01-18-2004 06:44 AM
in what way is Linux less vulnerable than Windows? ryancw Linux - Newbie 18 10-10-2003 03:45 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:16 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration