GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Yep, went to both of them actually, and even read the about section. But, it still all seems to just say blanket things, not really saying who he hacked, or what he did. Figured maybe someone on here might know a little more details about it, but thanks for the links anyway guys.
BTW, Chad I have seen film - "Hackers 2".... cool....about Mitnick and Shimomura
I suggest you to go to www.takedown.com , everything about Kevin David Mitnick , Tsutomu Shimomura and all other 'stuff' is written there,
very interesting article btw.
Who is Mitnick? He is just a product of smart people, who advertised it, made good affero and lots of money
Hacker is such human that noone shouldk know about him
Maybe Kevin is some sort of 'low-level' phreakers..uh... I have seen ( and known ) much more 'intelegent' people.... especially in Russia
Hijacking this thread for a moment, if you don't mind
Who else does it interminably annoy when the press (and anyone else, for that matter) use the journalistic term 'hacker' to mean, what we, the enlightened computer savvy people, know to really be a 'cracker'? Have any of you ever written to the editor/producer of such publications? What was the outcome?
Well, I tried to point it out for PC-Mag crew, and I got no reply nor feedback in their magazine. Ignorence is bliss. And there is no PC-Mag in my maail anymore, it was replaced with Linux Magazine!!!
I don't see what the probelm is. If 90% of the population thinks a hacker is what we call a cracker, than that's effectively what hacker means. Minorities who, for some reason, presume their definitions of words are somehow more correct than everyone else's very seldom get their way (and rightly so, IMHO).
Of course we can all go on observeing the hacker/cracker distinction, but why should the rest of the world have to speak how we want them to? You don't get mathematicians insisting that everybody use "normal" exclusively to mean perpendicular, after all.
</rant>
Alex
Last edited by llama_meme; 10-08-2002 at 10:49 AM.
No, but since computer savvy people (such as our good selves) are becoming ever more part of the mainstream, it will serve as a point of confusion if we, as an increasing group, use the term to mean someone who writes programs, and the rest of the public don't see it that way... they'll think that we're all talking about crackers.
No, but since computer savvy people (such as our good selves) are becoming ever more part of the mainstream, it will serve as a point of confusion if we, as an increasing group, use the term to mean someone who writes programs, and the rest of the public don't see it that way... they'll think that we're all talking about crackers.
Agreed, but only because we're too stubborn to accept that hacker now generally means the same as cracker. If we changed our usage there'd be no problem. Also, we often use hacking in the context of cracking anyway (e.g. "RMS hacked into a website") so it's no wonder people get confused over the meaning of it.
Hmm, sorry to go making a big argument out of this. Will shut up if that's requested.
Alex
Last edited by llama_meme; 10-08-2002 at 12:34 PM.
He he. No, I see your point... I suppose there are always two arguments, but which one is right? I guess the fact that there are more of 'them' than there are of 'us' dictates that the common usage of hacker shall always be the in the journalistic sense. Hey ho.
Hey MasterC, so did you find any info on what did Kevin exactly do? Because I too have seen articles where they say: "Internet crimes"(Like it says a lot to us ) But I do know a couple of things. I had a great magazine which was totally dedicated to Kevin Mitnick but I think I gave it to somebody. But one thing I surelly remember because it was very funny. Mitnick broke into Sun Microsystems and downloaded the "Solaris" source code. Sun charged him for 80 million dollars. (I think ) But the funniest part is that Sun now distributes the same source for free to educational institutions and for 100 bucks(Again,I don't exactly remember the sums ) to regular folks. Cool, ain't it?
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.