LinuxQuestions.org
Support LQ: Use code LQ3 and save $3 on Domain Registration
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices

View Poll Results: Should we let go of Flash?
Yes 29 78.38%
No 8 21.62%
Voters: 37. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 01-29-2010, 01:54 PM   #16
MTK358
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,443
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 713Reputation: 713Reputation: 713Reputation: 713Reputation: 713Reputation: 713Reputation: 713

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrCode View Post
I would LOVE it if YouTube would start using <video></video> tags! Flash uses like 90% CPU for me. I'm sure even if I had a dual-core machine, though (right now I've got a measly P4), it would still make the CPU usage skyrocket! It's as if Flash goes out of its way to slow your machine down.

EDIT:



WHERE?? I'd love to see this!

(Although I dunno if it's gonna work, seeing as how FF has only partial support for <video></video> )
www.youtube.com/testtube

It only works (intermittently) in Chromium for me.
 
Old 01-29-2010, 01:56 PM   #17
GrapefruiTgirl
Guru
 
Registered: Dec 2006
Location: underground
Distribution: Slackware64
Posts: 7,594

Rep: Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550
FWIW, I'd like to see Flash gone away. I usually have it blocked or disabled anyway, but when I DO have to use it, it works fine, but something built right into HTML would be better IMO.

Also, the beta link above doesn't play for me, using FF 3.6 my own build. Maybe not enough support yet? I can't recall what state the HTML5 support is in this version of FF.
 
Old 01-29-2010, 05:40 PM   #18
David the H.
Bash Guru
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Osaka, Japan
Distribution: Debian sid + kde 3.5 & 4.4
Posts: 6,823

Rep: Reputation: 1947Reputation: 1947Reputation: 1947Reputation: 1947Reputation: 1947Reputation: 1947Reputation: 1947Reputation: 1947Reputation: 1947Reputation: 1947Reputation: 1947
The Youtube beta is exactly what I was talking about. While the pages use HTML5, the video itself is still encoded in h264 and thus won't work on mozilla-based browsers at this time. Youtube will have to convert all it's video to theora before that will happen. But since theora is just an optional codec, there's no external pressure on them to do so. What reason do sites like that have to spend time and money to convert and store their entire video catalogs in multiple formats just so they can support all browsers?

Being the big dog on the block, whichever direction Youtube/Google decides to go is going to have a major impact on what happens with HTML5 video support.
 
Old 01-29-2010, 07:07 PM   #19
MTK358
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,443
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 713Reputation: 713Reputation: 713Reputation: 713Reputation: 713Reputation: 713Reputation: 713
Still I would rather install non-free codecs than Flash. I often have non-free codecs anyway to be able to view most media files.
 
Old 01-30-2010, 09:42 AM   #20
manwichmakesameal
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2006
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 800

Rep: Reputation: 100Reputation: 100
@ MTK358: That link for the youtube html test site works great with Chrome. What were the issues you were having with it?
 
Old 01-30-2010, 11:28 AM   #21
MTK358
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,443
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 713Reputation: 713Reputation: 713Reputation: 713Reputation: 713Reputation: 713Reputation: 713
Quote:
Originally Posted by manwichmakesameal View Post
@ MTK358: That link for the youtube html test site works great with Chrome. What were the issues you were having with it?
I only works about 1/4 of the time, and Chromium by itself loads web pages intolerably slow.
 
Old 01-30-2010, 11:42 AM   #22
Dinithion
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2007
Location: Norway
Distribution: Slackware 13.37
Posts: 436

Rep: Reputation: 56
We should let go of flash to play videos. For that we now have html5. But flash still got functions html5 doesn't have, doesn't it? It's got support for input devices, so it can access web cameras, microphones, keyboard and mouse so that. That gives a lot of options for games and such. (I, for one, prefer flash games to java. I think. I hardly play any games) But I don't really know if html cover these areas as well in the new standard.

Anyway, flash >> silverlight, so in the end I don't think we should let it go. That would be like giving Microsoft a Christmas present and eventually we (GNU/Linux uses) would get a great backfire.
 
Old 01-30-2010, 01:15 PM   #23
brianL
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Oldham, Lancs, England
Distribution: Slackware & Slackware64 14.1
Posts: 6,958
Blog Entries: 52

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
What's happening with Gnash?
 
Old 01-30-2010, 01:22 PM   #24
H_TeXMeX_H
Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,928
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269
Quote:
Originally Posted by brianL View Post
What's happening with Gnash?
not much, they're at about the same place they were when I last tried it.

But, who uses webcabs through flash ? I've never heard of it, or a microphone.
 
Old 01-31-2010, 02:58 PM   #25
Arty Ziff
Member
 
Registered: May 2008
Location: Tacoma, WA
Distribution: CentOS and RHEL
Posts: 94

Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by embed View Post
Unless silverlight replaces it.
Silverlight is dead.

As to html5, meh. I'm more interested in seeing IE embrace CSS3.
 
Old 01-31-2010, 03:15 PM   #26
no2498
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2010
Posts: 120

Rep: Reputation: 23
i use flash to put my webcam on line
that is on this computer with 804 ubuntu


now i have a dell 6400 also but with 910 karmic
flash works on it but not with a webcam yet

it must cost a lot for the web master to use in his cam and chat lol $4.00
? how much for html
 
Old 01-31-2010, 03:25 PM   #27
Tinkster
Moderator
 
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: in a fallen world
Distribution: slackware by choice, others too :} ... android.
Posts: 22,972
Blog Entries: 11

Rep: Reputation: 876Reputation: 876Reputation: 876Reputation: 876Reputation: 876Reputation: 876Reputation: 876
I don't mind flash for video content or games, what pisses me
off is forms or navigation written in flash. It makes it next
to impossible to automate tasks - or at least I haven't found
a way of e.g. using flash-based auction sites via perl.

Flash is widely overrated, and certainly used too much in areas
where plain-jane HTML would have given the same results ...


Cheers,
Tink
 
Old 01-31-2010, 03:31 PM   #28
Dinithion
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2007
Location: Norway
Distribution: Slackware 13.37
Posts: 436

Rep: Reputation: 56
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinkster View Post
what pisses me off is forms or navigation written in flash.
Using flash for purposes such like that is a real pain in the ass. Some online shops use flash. All flash. You can't give someone a link to ask there opinion on something, you need to give them directions. That's useless.
 
Old 01-31-2010, 03:56 PM   #29
replica9000
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2006
Location: Quahog, Rhode Island
Distribution: Debian 'Sid', FreeBSD, Android
Posts: 637
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 112Reputation: 112
I don't mind flash for mini flash games, but for video, it sucks! I have a dual core machine @ 3300mhz and videos still skips. Mostly skips viewing in the browser, such as being on youtube. Though performance is better playing in VLC or SMPlayer. I'm not a fan of flash navigation either.
 
Old 01-31-2010, 04:28 PM   #30
MTK358
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,443
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 713Reputation: 713Reputation: 713Reputation: 713Reputation: 713Reputation: 713Reputation: 713
I really hate flash navigation , too. What are they thinking?
 
  


Reply

Tags
flash


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
USB Flash Drive, write protect, and flash file system questions storkus Linux - Hardware 4 12-01-2008 04:32 AM
i can not access my flash memory after installing ubuntu from flash eramax Ubuntu 2 10-27-2008 11:11 AM
FLASH FLASH XP Home and Samba Fix FLASH FLASH zollodav Linux - Networking 1 02-19-2006 01:16 AM
Problems with sound, when playing flash files. Flash plug-in installed. Mistreated Linux - Software 2 09-02-2004 02:13 PM
Need older version of Flash (5,6 or MX, NOT MX 2004) to get flash with WINE working. brynjarh Linux - Software 0 06-12-2004 08:41 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:46 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration