LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices



View Poll Results: Should we let go of Flash?
Yes 29 78.38%
No 8 21.62%
Voters: 37. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 01-29-2010, 03:15 AM   #1
Agon
EZIM Maintainer
 
Registered: Jul 2007
Distribution: Slackware64 14.0
Posts: 10

Rep: Reputation: 0
Question Should We Let Go of Flash?


Apple launched its iPad without Flash support. I started to realize maybe it is time for us to let go of Flash. Knowing that there are some inevitable sacrifices, with current and/or future HTML5 and canvas support, what else are there holding us back relying on non-standard proprietaries?
 
Old 01-29-2010, 04:16 AM   #2
David the H.
Bash Guru
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Osaka, Japan
Distribution: Debian sid + kde 3.5 & 4.4
Posts: 6,823

Rep: Reputation: 1950Reputation: 1950Reputation: 1950Reputation: 1950Reputation: 1950Reputation: 1950Reputation: 1950Reputation: 1950Reputation: 1950Reputation: 1950Reputation: 1950
The only thing holding back HTML5 as a replacement, at least for multimedia support, is that they never demanded in the standard the use of open codecs like vorbis and theora, meaning that each browser can choose what they want to support. The biggest worry here is that the patent-encumbered h264 video codec is already in heavy use, and if that becomes the de-facto standard, then it's going to leave FOSS browsers out in the cold.

As for flash itself, I've always thought that it's a decent medium for interactive content, like games, but the recent trend of embedded flash media players is making it particularly annoying. Just this afternoon I was trying to watch some video on a site that uses one of these players, and all it did was alternate between choppy half-playing and locking my browser up completely, while all the time spiking my cpu to the maximum. I never had problems like this when audio/video was offered through simple links to the file itself. I could either play it with a multimedia plugin like mplayer, stream it to an external player, or simply download it. Now I can't touch the actual content at all.

Last edited by David the H.; 01-29-2010 at 04:17 AM.
 
Old 01-29-2010, 05:33 AM   #3
H_TeXMeX_H
Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,928
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269
flash is s**t, so yeah it would be better if it disappeared, but it won't. Adobe is huge and powerful and evil, it will live on.
 
Old 01-29-2010, 08:37 AM   #4
MTK358
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,443
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 714Reputation: 714Reputation: 714Reputation: 714Reputation: 714Reputation: 714Reputation: 714
I HATE FLASH!!!

The only reason I have it is for YouTube, but YouTube has an HTML5 beta and Chromium is beginning to support HTML5, so soon there may finally be no reason to have it, so long as you watch YouTube just in Chromium.

Also there are so many annoying, stupid animations and tricky, useless interactive stuff (especially on company websites) that I just can't stand. It's as if they are just thinking of every possible way to make their site bloated. All thanks to Flash. I hope that even when HTML5 will be able to do those things, they won't.

And what happened to <video> tags?

Flash is almost the only thing standing between the Internet and Open Source!

Last edited by MTK358; 01-29-2010 at 08:38 AM.
 
Old 01-29-2010, 08:37 AM   #5
embed
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2009
Distribution: Pardus, Ubuntu, Arch, H:1, QTmoko
Posts: 14

Rep: Reputation: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by H_TeXMeX_H View Post
flash is s**t, so yeah it would be better if it disappeared, but it won't. Adobe is huge and powerful and evil, it will live on.
Unless silverlight replaces it.
 
Old 01-29-2010, 08:40 AM   #6
MTK358
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,443
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 714Reputation: 714Reputation: 714Reputation: 714Reputation: 714Reputation: 714Reputation: 714
Quote:
Originally Posted by embed View Post
Unless silverlight replaces it.
I really hope that browser devs get to work on HTML5, FAST!

But then again, IE probably will lag behind the great new web standards a few years, as always, forcing web developers to use things like Flash and Silverlight because they have no choice.

Last edited by MTK358; 01-29-2010 at 08:42 AM.
 
Old 01-29-2010, 09:04 AM   #7
H_TeXMeX_H
Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,928
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269
Quote:
Originally Posted by embed View Post
Unless silverlight replaces it.
Yeah, wouldn't that be even better.
 
Old 01-29-2010, 09:14 AM   #8
MTK358
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,443
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 714Reputation: 714Reputation: 714Reputation: 714Reputation: 714Reputation: 714Reputation: 714
Quote:
Originally Posted by H_TeXMeX_H View Post
Yeah, wouldn't that be even better.
I still hope that if not HTML5, web developers will choose Flash over Silverlight. There's no way that Microsoft will make Silverlight for Linux, and it will also basically let MS control a large part of the Internet!
 
Old 01-29-2010, 09:39 AM   #9
b0uncer
Guru
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Distribution: CentOS, OS X
Posts: 5,131

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Definitely should. There's nothing wrong in Flash as such, just like there's nothing wrong in Java applets for example, but I just don't think they should be used that widely for web content..not everybody has the most recent Flash version just like not everybody has Java turned on in their browsers. I dislike more or less everything that cannot be made "by the book", by using HTML and CSS. Sure there are differences in the results between browsers, but that's how it should be done: describe content and how it is supposed to look like. Images I can live with, JavaScript in some cases, even Java applets if it is really really needed, but Flash I would bury six feet under if only it was possible. Anything that is supposed to be dynamic should be done on server end, so that the end-user didn't need to have ugly closed plugins that never work everywhere.

I don't think video content is an excuse, because those videos can be downloaded (as Flash files anyway) and therefore the only "con" in Flash is that you get nice buttons and it *might* play in your browser. They could just as well cripple down the video quality (if that's wanted) and serve the file in some regular format, allowing the user to either download and watch it using her/his favourite app, or have the browser (if it is capable and user is willing to) play it right there.

HTML 5 or whatever "new" standards are coming isn't much of help, looking at how CSS alone is supported today in the major browsers and what versions people use. Not only the "modern" browsers still misbehave (or not behave at all) with certain CSS stuff, but a (relatively big) part of users are always using (and that's how it will stay it seems) quite outdated versions of browsers, which just adds to the pain. I'm hoping to see CSS 3 working sometime in the 50's, but by then they might have ditched the whole concept of HTML/CSS and moved on to Flash

On the other hand, Flash is tolerable in the sense that it doesn't (as of now) cost a cent to use, it is supported on the biggest few operating systems and works in the biggest few browsers. Should it go away, we would surely have something to fill its place, perhaps worse..

Last edited by b0uncer; 01-29-2010 at 09:40 AM.
 
Old 01-29-2010, 09:59 AM   #10
manwichmakesameal
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2006
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 800

Rep: Reputation: 100Reputation: 100
Christ, yes. Please can we get rid of flash. It's a cpu hog, and doesn't do anything useful.
 
Old 01-29-2010, 11:13 AM   #11
Blinker_Fluid
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Clinging to my guns and religion.
Posts: 682

Rep: Reputation: 63
The death of flash isn't going to be because Apple doesn't include it on their iPad. Flash is going to outlive the iPad and flash going away will be because flash sucks not anything to do with an itouch that is too big to put in your pocket.
 
Old 01-29-2010, 11:43 AM   #12
carbonfiber
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: Sparta
Posts: 237

Rep: Reputation: 46
Wait until *BSD gets good flash support, -then- get rid of it! It would be so funny.
 
Old 01-29-2010, 11:56 AM   #13
Alexvader
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2009
Location: Japan
Distribution: Arch, Debian, Slackware
Posts: 994

Rep: Reputation: 94
Yes

We should get rid of it...

I voted for yes...

Although I admit, net being able to see Youtube will be bad

BRGDS

Alex
 
Old 01-29-2010, 02:03 PM   #14
MrCode
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2009
Location: Oregon, USA
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 864
Blog Entries: 31

Rep: Reputation: 148Reputation: 148
I would LOVE it if YouTube would start using <video></video> tags! Flash uses like 90% CPU for me. I'm sure even if I had a dual-core machine, though (right now I've got a measly P4), it would still make the CPU usage skyrocket! It's as if Flash goes out of its way to slow your machine down.

EDIT:

Quote:
YouTube has an HTML5 beta
WHERE?? I'd love to see this!

(Although I dunno if it's gonna work, seeing as how FF has only partial support for <video></video> )

Last edited by MrCode; 01-29-2010 at 02:14 PM.
 
Old 01-29-2010, 02:44 PM   #15
H_TeXMeX_H
Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,928
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrCode View Post
I would LOVE it if YouTube would start using <video></video> tags! Flash uses like 90% CPU for me. I'm sure even if I had a dual-core machine, though (right now I've got a measly P4), it would still make the CPU usage skyrocket! It's as if Flash goes out of its way to slow your machine down.

EDIT:



WHERE?? I'd love to see this!

(Although I dunno if it's gonna work, seeing as how FF has only partial support for <video></video> )
Well, supposedly it's here:
http://neosmart.net/YouTube5/

But it has never worked for me.
 
  


Reply

Tags
flash


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
USB Flash Drive, write protect, and flash file system questions storkus Linux - Hardware 4 12-01-2008 05:32 AM
i can not access my flash memory after installing ubuntu from flash eramax Ubuntu 2 10-27-2008 12:11 PM
FLASH FLASH XP Home and Samba Fix FLASH FLASH zollodav Linux - Networking 1 02-19-2006 02:16 AM
Problems with sound, when playing flash files. Flash plug-in installed. Mistreated Linux - Software 2 09-02-2004 03:13 PM
Need older version of Flash (5,6 or MX, NOT MX 2004) to get flash with WINE working. brynjarh Linux - Software 0 06-12-2004 09:41 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:51 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration