| General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun! |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
|
12-01-2005, 12:44 AM
|
#1
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Manila, Philippines
Posts: 2
Rep:
|
Red Hat 9 Distro Download links
i'm looking for the RH9 iso files of all 3 discs but all links leads me to fedora project.... what does it mean? does RH9 download links already gone, or they don't release RH9 for a some reason, and what is the reason ?
Even here at this site's download link RH9 doesnt refer me to that download of the iso files....
i dont have a copy of it since the 3 cds were broken by accident, i need it to install it on my pc.
Do you have another links for those iso files....
|
|
|
|
12-01-2005, 12:58 AM
|
#2
|
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Tampere, Finland
Distribution: Debian, Familiar, OS X
Posts: 145
Rep:
|
redhat has gone commercial so they donīt offer downloads anymore. if you have broken cds i suggest you contact redhat.
otherwise, choose another distro.
there is one distro that is downloadable and made from redhat source. alas, i donīt remember the name.
edit: CentOS, if i remember correctly
Last edited by pevelius; 12-01-2005 at 01:02 AM.
|
|
|
|
12-01-2005, 02:49 AM
|
#3
|
|
LQ Veteran
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Distribution: Mint
Posts: 6,642
Rep:
|
Redhat officially ended support for Redhat 9 in April or May of 2004, if I recall. It has not been supported for a *very* long time, and quite frankly I don't think it can be recommended any longer as a viable distro.
As you've discovered, Redhat has made some changes. Their officially supported, corporate distros is Redhat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) and their open source, personal Linux distros is now the Fedora project, which currently is in release v4. You would have to buy RHEL, but if you want to use the free Linux distro that Redhat maintains, download the Fedora Core 4 (FC4) ISO's. Good luck with it either way and Welcome to LQ
|
|
|
|
12-01-2005, 06:28 AM
|
#4
|
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Albany, Western Australia
Distribution: Mageia 2, SME Server 8
Posts: 609
Rep:
|
try here
dont know if the links will still work though
http://www.linuxiso.org/distro.php?distro=7
cheers
floppy
|
|
|
|
12-01-2005, 08:18 PM
|
#5
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Manila, Philippines
Posts: 2
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by pevelius
redhat has gone commercial so they donīt offer downloads anymore.
edit: CentOS, if i remember correctly
|
Ok, i dont have any idea that RH9 had gone commercial. A friend had just handed me a copy of RH9 and told me to try linux aside from windows. Unexpectedly my younger sister played with it.
All download links here are not available anymore.
I'll try another distro..
Quote:
|
What distro would you suggest to start up with (as a newbie)
|
|
|
|
|
12-01-2005, 08:52 PM
|
#6
|
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2005
Posts: 51
Rep:
|
Good idea. RH9 is so out of date, you would hate it.
|
|
|
|
12-01-2005, 08:56 PM
|
#7
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Distribution: Ubuntu, Debian, Various using VMWare
Posts: 2,088
Rep:
|
If you are looking for another distro to try, either download Fedora core 4, which needs 4 CDs, or try another distro such as Ubuntu which IMO is easier to use and comes on 1 cd.
Anyway, it is important to use an up to date distro because any security problems have been fixed, and the software will be better supported.
--Ian
|
|
|
|
12-01-2005, 09:26 PM
|
#9
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Manila, Philippines
Posts: 2
Original Poster
Rep:
|
These distro have powerful GUI's as windows...
Does it have its commandline/terminal to be studied about
if i learned more about linux; i would suggest my friends here and even teach them on how to use linux....
only few of us here wanted to learn linux. coz they said its not that easy to use....
it only takes time to get used to it
|
|
|
|
12-01-2005, 09:31 PM
|
#10
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Orlando FL
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 1,765
Rep:
|
all linux has the standard CLI terminals.
someone asked about a newbie friendly distro, and still considering myself a newbie, i found that the GUI install and base GUI desktop helped me loads when converting from MS to Linux world.
I am happy to say that in roughly 2 years I went from dabbling in linux to having nothing but linux and OSx at my house and at my office. I could not of made the switch as easy as i did without the heavy GUI of RH9.
my current fav. distro is debian and that does not have a nice GUI installer, nor does it install a heavy GUI desktop by default, at least not the way i do it *grins*.
i just apt-get everything after i get the base system 1CD installed.
|
|
|
|
12-01-2005, 09:45 PM
|
#11
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Manila, Philippines
Posts: 2
Original Poster
Rep:
|
what is that OSx i heard it all before but i dont know if it is x86 compatible?
i'm always in the windows world since i've started from MS-DOS, win3.11 up to XP. so i want some changes. i want other chanllenges by other os
|
|
|
|
12-01-2005, 09:52 PM
|
#12
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Manila, Philippines
Posts: 2
Original Poster
Rep:
|
is debian distro a new one? i forgot to ask about it
|
|
|
|
12-01-2005, 11:34 PM
|
#13
|
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: singapore
Distribution: puppy and Ubuntu and ... erh ... redhat(sort of) :( ... + the venerable bsd and solaris ^_^
Posts: 658
Rep:
|
if you insist on redhat "variants" , here is a ftp site which have some redhat 7.3 and 9 iso :: redhat iso
judging from the directory name , seems that there are also some enterprise "ungrades" stuffs within that link and specifically , redhat 9 iso is in the directory of "/linux/RedHat/9/iso/i386" ...
according to "readers voting" , CentOS finished 2nd (Below Ubuntu and above Fedora Core) , these might shed some initial clues in advocating free software at your place ...
also dont forget to have a peep at this Unofficial Ubuntu 5.04 Starter Guide , print it out from windows , it doesnt need to be ubuntu specfic , have some quick and simple clues at what linux can do for you ...
anyway , if you are going to be a "pure" linux guy , eventually you will probably also go into other distros like debian , slack and gentoo and LFS etc etc ...
linux is easier than microsoft windows ...
//hope this helps you in one way or another ^_^
Last edited by alred; 12-01-2005 at 11:41 PM.
|
|
|
|
12-01-2005, 11:58 PM
|
#14
|
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: singapore
Distribution: puppy and Ubuntu and ... erh ... redhat(sort of) :( ... + the venerable bsd and solaris ^_^
Posts: 658
Rep:
|
btw ... after trying helping you , i'm now kind of interested in this centos ... hope that i dont suffer *nix-based gastrointestinal disorder ... 
|
|
|
|
12-02-2005, 04:00 PM
|
#15
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Orlando FL
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 1,765
Rep:
|
debian is OLD, one of the older distros.
CentOS is a fork from RHE, meaning it is something that took the base RHE and some minor changes were made. in the case of CentOS, they took out all of the trademark RH icons and what not and replaced them. other then that nothing has changed.
OSx is the MAC OS so no it will not run on any kind of PC as it requires Apple hardware.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:14 AM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|