LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 05-19-2008, 06:51 AM   #1
ronlau9
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2007
Location: In front of my LINUX OR MAC BOX
Distribution: Mandriva 2009 X86_64 suse 11.3 X86_64 Centos X86_64 Debian X86_64 Linux MInt 86_64 OS X
Posts: 2,369

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quantum computer


It is no about 30 years ago that we are thinking about the possibility to build a quantum computer.
According to some scientist they manage to build a working prototype
but the performance of my old Spectrum Sinclair is better.
But if it is really their it can do a thousands of calculations at the same time. So that is really fasten seat belts.
Considering my age I can not wait a other 30 years or so
I love it to talk about qbits and qbytes .
And will linux run on it ?
So can anybody tell me when can we really use such a computer ?


regards


ron
 
Old 05-19-2008, 09:59 AM   #2
indienick
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: London, ON, Canada
Distribution: Arch, Ubuntu, Slackware, OpenBSD, FreeBSD
Posts: 1,853

Rep: Reputation: 65
I can almost guarantee, if a truly quantum computer comes out, it won't be using a statically typed language like C or assembler to interface with the hardware. More than likely the Unununium project (a nearly-pure Python OS) may get resurrected, or they'll buckle down and write a {Common Lisp|Scheme}-based OS; something in a language that can be modified by itself, without having to be recompiled or rely on user interaction (or, at least, excessive amounts of user interaction).
 
Old 05-19-2008, 11:57 AM   #3
H_TeXMeX_H
Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,928
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269
I'm questioning how reliable these things are gonna be. I'm thinking not very. I don't think the idea will go too far, but who knows. I think most probably a better system will pass this one while it's in development.
 
Old 05-19-2008, 12:06 PM   #4
XavierP
Moderator
 
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Kent, England
Distribution: Lubuntu
Posts: 19,176
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 430Reputation: 430Reputation: 430Reputation: 430Reputation: 430
Moved: This thread is more suitable in General and has been moved accordingly to help your thread/question get the exposure it deserves.
 
Old 05-19-2008, 12:26 PM   #5
b0uncer
Guru
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Distribution: CentOS, OS X
Posts: 5,131

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
A "quantum computer" is a pretty broad term. Sort of like "a light emittor", which could mean a thousand things that are not even near each other.. No offense meant, but things like that just bump into my eye media takes a term that isn't polished, makes it hot and sells it to the masses..and all of a sudden everybody is talking about quantum computers and all, without knowing what exactly they are or in any case, where the name comes from. A "quantum" means generally something that is limited or of known size; for example energy levels can be quantized, which simply means that between two energies there isn't just a continuum of energy (i.e. endless number of "energy levels" that differ from each other close to none), but instead there is a certain number of energy levels. This is the basic thing behind "quantum physics", "quantum mechanics" and all other quantum-something things, and when considered closely, leads to some astonishing things (or things that at first look astonishing).

But if we're not picky about it, I don't think a "quantum computer" that makes a today's computer look like an abacus will be built too soon. And probably before it's finished people have a better idea that is halfway finished, and by the time both of them are old, there's still a flame war going on about which OS is the best for that computer

If I'm not mistaken, some sort of models of circuits already exist that use light instead of electricity to transform information. Last time I remember reading, folks were wondering about how to build logic ports (and apparently there were a few good ideas about that) that worked well, and that a chip that used light instead of electric current to transform information could be considerably faster than the ones we use today..not sure what is going on on that front today, but that didn't either sound like something I'm going to buy in the years coming. And that isn't exactly quantum physics either..more like "new optics".
 
Old 05-19-2008, 01:44 PM   #6
ronlau9
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2007
Location: In front of my LINUX OR MAC BOX
Distribution: Mandriva 2009 X86_64 suse 11.3 X86_64 Centos X86_64 Debian X86_64 Linux MInt 86_64 OS X
Posts: 2,369

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Well after reading a lot of books about Quantum theory I do have a idea what it is all about
But the problem is that even the scientist are more or less confused about quantum theory
An other thing is that media jumps on certain things and blow it up

all the best

Last edited by ronlau9; 05-19-2008 at 01:45 PM. Reason: save to soon
 
Old 05-19-2008, 04:26 PM   #7
frenchn00b
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2007
Location: E.U., Mountains :-)
Distribution: Debian, Etch, the greatest
Posts: 2,546

Rep: Reputation: 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by ronlau9 View Post
It is no about 30 years ago that we are thinking about the possibility to build a quantum computer.
According to some scientist they manage to build a working prototype
but the performance of my old Spectrum Sinclair is better.
But if it is really their it can do a thousands of calculations at the same time. So that is really fasten seat belts.
Considering my age I can not wait a other 30 years or so
I love it to talk about qbits and qbytes .
And will linux run on it ?
So can anybody tell me when can we really use such a computer ?


regards


ron
Cool stuffs. It is very frequent to do this, with CLUSTER. This is typically what is doing Google, maybe you may ask them if they cannot share you bit of CPU they have. They have more than enough They "officially published" that they dont want any kind of crap computer or times "X100" when/if it can be replaced with a single one very " CPU " !

try Debian or Fedora for the cluster (advice):
http://debianclusters.cs.uni.edu/index.php/Main_Page
 
Old 05-19-2008, 04:29 PM   #8
frenchn00b
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2007
Location: E.U., Mountains :-)
Distribution: Debian, Etch, the greatest
Posts: 2,546

Rep: Reputation: 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by ronlau9 View Post
Well after reading a lot of books about Quantum theory I do have a idea what it is all about
But the problem is that even the scientist are more or less confused about quantum theory
An other thing is that media jumps on certain things and blow it up

all the best
You can make it up, but I am not sure you'll manage ... well, you know such calculations are always far from reality.
Are you gonna start from Schrodinger equation, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schr%C3%B6dinger_equation or further ?
For Wave propagations applications? It's very frequent to do this with a min 100 machines.
 
  


Reply

Tags
computer


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: Getting Started With Quantum GIS LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 03-27-2008 06:10 AM
LXer: Quantum Cryptography and the XO laptop LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 01-03-2008 03:20 PM
Quantum xt 2000 tape drive ockertom Linux - Hardware 3 05-12-2006 05:30 PM
Ubuntu and Quantum hard drive pelgrimforever Ubuntu 0 04-07-2006 06:34 AM
Quantum GIS Dependency conflict on Suse 9.2 suse2166 Linux - Software 6 03-20-2005 03:53 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:08 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration