LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices

Closed Thread
 
Search this Thread
Old 12-17-2010, 12:39 PM   #1561
Mark7
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2006
Location: Leicester
Distribution: Ubuntu 10.10 with ROX DE
Posts: 191

Rep: Reputation: 32

Of course

http://www.kde.org/screenshots/image...de2final_2.jpg

http://www.kde.org/screenshots/kde2shots.php
 
Old 12-17-2010, 12:39 PM   #1562
MTK358
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,443
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 713Reputation: 713Reputation: 713Reputation: 713Reputation: 713Reputation: 713Reputation: 713
Why would KDE start with 3.0?!?!?!?
 
Old 12-17-2010, 12:41 PM   #1563
Mark7
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2006
Location: Leicester
Distribution: Ubuntu 10.10 with ROX DE
Posts: 191

Rep: Reputation: 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeebizz View Post
Snap!
 
Old 12-17-2010, 12:53 PM   #1564
Alexvader
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2009
Location: Japan
Distribution: Arch, Debian, Slackware
Posts: 994

Rep: Reputation: 94
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTK358 View Post
Why would KDE start with 3.0?!?!?!?
probably because of reliability/stability issues... maybe... never used kde 1.x or 2.x....
 
Old 12-17-2010, 01:10 PM   #1565
Jeebizz
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Distribution: Slackware 14.1 64-bit with multilib
Posts: 2,074

Rep: Reputation: 193Reputation: 193
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alexvader View Post
probably because of reliability/stability issues... maybe... never used kde 1.x or 2.x....
That really makes no sense because usually any software deemed unstable is usually preceded by alpha or beta, not by version number alone (except maybe the linux kernel).

By your logic if any software that has a 1.0 or 2.0 status would mean that it is automatically unstable, so I guess all version of linux kernel 1.0 and 2.0 are unstable?

Even though in the Linux kernel version numbering scheme 1.0, 2.0 are deemed stable, and any uneven numbers like 1.1 or 2.1 are deemed development (potentially unstable).
 
Old 12-17-2010, 01:22 PM   #1566
Alexvader
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2009
Location: Japan
Distribution: Arch, Debian, Slackware
Posts: 994

Rep: Reputation: 94
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeebizz View Post
That really makes no sense because usually any software deemed unstable is usually preceded by alpha or beta, not by version number alone (except maybe the linux kernel).

By your logic if any software that has a 1.0 or 2.0 status would mean that it is automatically unstable, so I guess all version of linux kernel 1.0 and 2.0 are unstable?

Even though in the Linux kernel version numbering scheme 1.0, 2.0 are deemed stable, and any uneven numbers like 1.1 or 2.1 are deemed development (potentially unstable).
I Understand...
 
Old 12-17-2010, 07:37 PM   #1567
Kenny_Strawn
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2010
Location: /usa/ca/orange_county/lake_forest
Distribution: ArchBang, Google Android 2.1 + Motoblur (on Motortola Flipside), Google Chrome OS (on Cr-48)
Posts: 1,791
Blog Entries: 62

Rep: Reputation: 54
Did any of you see my Chromium screenshot on page 104 or did you all just skip right over it?
 
Old 12-17-2010, 07:42 PM   #1568
lupusarcanus
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 1,022
Blog Entries: 19

Rep: Reputation: 146Reputation: 146
I just missed it.

Looks neat Kenny.
 
Old 12-17-2010, 07:42 PM   #1569
TobiSGD
Moderator
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Hanover, Germany
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 15,411
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 3995Reputation: 3995Reputation: 3995Reputation: 3995Reputation: 3995Reputation: 3995Reputation: 3995Reputation: 3995Reputation: 3995Reputation: 3995Reputation: 3995
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kenny_Strawn View Post
Did any of you see my Chromium screenshot on page 104 or did you all just skip right over it?
It would be better to give a post number, not all of us use the standard settings.
 
Old 12-17-2010, 07:43 PM   #1570
Kenny_Strawn
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2010
Location: /usa/ca/orange_county/lake_forest
Distribution: ArchBang, Google Android 2.1 + Motoblur (on Motortola Flipside), Google Chrome OS (on Cr-48)
Posts: 1,791
Blog Entries: 62

Rep: Reputation: 54
It's Post 1552 in this thread.
 
Old 12-17-2010, 08:01 PM   #1571
soppy
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Location: In your head!
Distribution: Arch Linux
Posts: 165
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kenny_Strawn View Post
Did any of you see my Chromium screenshot on page 104 or did you all just skip right over it?
I saw it, but I didn't really like it.
 
Old 12-17-2010, 11:01 PM   #1572
Kenny_Strawn
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2010
Location: /usa/ca/orange_county/lake_forest
Distribution: ArchBang, Google Android 2.1 + Motoblur (on Motortola Flipside), Google Chrome OS (on Cr-48)
Posts: 1,791
Blog Entries: 62

Rep: Reputation: 54
http://lh5.ggpht.com/_7Mz1DpTbj3c/TQ...InChromium.png

Now notice the circled username/email address.
 
Old 12-17-2010, 11:10 PM   #1573
lupusarcanus
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 1,022
Blog Entries: 19

Rep: Reputation: 146Reputation: 146
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kenny_Strawn View Post
http://lh5.ggpht.com/_7Mz1DpTbj3c/TQ...InChromium.png

Now notice the circled username/email address.
Duly noted. Now what?
 
Old 12-18-2010, 11:18 AM   #1574
soppy
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Location: In your head!
Distribution: Arch Linux
Posts: 165
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kenny_Strawn View Post
http://lh5.ggpht.com/_7Mz1DpTbj3c/TQ...InChromium.png

Now notice the circled username/email address.
So, you have your own Gmail account? Congratulations I guess? The color is light blue (which is hard to read against the Earth IMO)? You have your name as your Gmail account? What Kenny? I see nothing special. Mine does the same. See? Except my font is the Default black.
Attached Images
File Type: png Screenshot.png (125.0 KB, 14 views)
 
Old 12-18-2010, 11:25 AM   #1575
Kenny_Strawn
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2010
Location: /usa/ca/orange_county/lake_forest
Distribution: ArchBang, Google Android 2.1 + Motoblur (on Motortola Flipside), Google Chrome OS (on Cr-48)
Posts: 1,791
Blog Entries: 62

Rep: Reputation: 54
That isn't just the Gmail account, if you look closely it's the New Tab page. As in the page that opens when you first open a tab.

Last edited by Kenny_Strawn; 12-18-2010 at 11:46 AM.
 
  


Closed Thread

Tags
desktop, linux, puppy


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Post Laptop screenshots here !! WhiskeyTangoFoxtrot General 11 05-05-2007 01:01 PM
Posting Images/Screenshots in the Post rakeshs LQ Suggestions & Feedback 4 01-15-2007 11:42 PM
Post your FC5 screenshots here !! WhiskeyTangoFoxtrot Fedora 10 05-10-2006 11:52 AM
Anyone could please post FreeBSd screenshots? unixfreak *BSD 3 07-21-2004 12:44 AM
Post your screenshots! SlCKB0Y Linux - General 184 03-07-2002 08:09 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:29 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration