GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
As near as I can tell, IBM still sells Warp but there don't seem to be any fixpacks that have been released for several years. Can any one enlighten me regarding IBM development and/or support for Warp? From the IBM site, it looks as if everything is Warp Server/Client stuff for e-business.
I dual boot WinNT/Warp on an old Dell Optiplex GXPro and prefer to use Warp on that machine - it is quite responsive and I have other machines with Win2K for my MS Win fix.
Yah. Warp is dead. No new development, no more fixpacks. Kinda sad really. At one time I was thinking of getting an OS/2 engineer certifcation. I made a nice living with OS/2 for a few years. It was an OS that was slightly ahead of its time. Certainly better than the Windows that was available then.
There are still a few signs of life. For one, the WATCOM C++ and Fortran compilers are now open source and still support OS/2. There seems to still be some application development going on, particularly in Germany.
Distribution: Debian and Gentoo (likely to change soon)
OS/2 was a great OS, way ahead of *shudder* Windows 3.1. Argh, Windows 3.1 was scary, I truly believe it crashed more than ME does (then again, I'm not using ME that much anymore, thanks to Linus and the FSF). I don't remember much about OS/2, I was only about 8(can't remember) when I first tried it. Good enough GUI for the time, stable, DOS compatible.
Imagine what the the desktop OS marked would be like if OS/2 was still competing with Windows and both were compatible with each other, maybe the dominant OS would be good software for once
Thanks - couldn't remember the name eComStation. Looks like the are struggling a bit - mainly installation problems. Nothing most of the folks here aren't familiar with A transistion is in progress regarding retail sales in the US so I couldn't get a price.
From their web site, I found a number of other active sites related to eCS and Warp. People are porting a lot of linux stuff to OS/2 and/or eCS. Having just bought a dual 933 MHz zero on ebay and finding prices on scsi drives are lower than ever, I am thinking about dual booting eCS with RedHat. eCS is SMP out of the box.
I put everybody in the office (when I had an office) on Warp because they all looked to me to keep their machines running. We integrated Fortran number crunchers with Smartware spreadsheets and database and later with MS Office to do long-term performance assessments on radwaste disposal sites. Warp provided a much more stable and productive environment than anything else that was available. Microsoft didn't catch up until NT 4, IMHO.
IBM's thin-client based on OS/2,
stripped of the WPS ... 3 years ago
I was quite impressed to see a PII 233
boot WSoD over a 16MBit TokenRing
in about 40 seconds ... and as for a
centralized environment it still seems
to be a VERY good choice. With an
underlying database of hardware &
software it was just amazing, you defined
a client on the server, and voila, next
boot everything is fine :) ...