News: "Today the mydoom virus made the homepage of Linux unaccessible"
GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
What will happend, if SCO win the case?
Someone will write the infected code out of the kernel, and write a replacement, or www.gnu.orgs hurd kernel will become the standart.
Well, I think mydoom.B is trading with www.microsoft.com for the time being.
The redmond monter's site seems to be definitely slow from here.
Just now I came to realize that I should download some really important and big updates for some 500 clients from redmond. I think each client deserves a separate download (since they are really good clients). Apart from that, our server will not be lazy for the night (it tends to get lazy).
However, I do not know what to download, yet, since I could only find 800k updates that do not deserve dealing with.
i dont think hurd will beocme a standard, its says itself that it only suports 1 archetectsure, and im not sure, but form this
Quote:
The GNU Hurd is the GNU project's replacement for the Unix kernel. The Hurd is a collection of servers that run on the Mach microkernel to implement file systems, network protocols, file access control, and other features that are implemented by the Unix kernel or similar kernels (such as Linux).
like i said im not sure, but i dont think server runing around doing stuff on a difrent kernel is very stable, it seems like a good idea true, but i dont think the idea will work well on older/less powerful systems, i realy dont have a clue if its true so im probly worng like always
The BBC seems to have messed up on the MyDoom story. There is a piece by journalist Stephen Evans here which treats it as a forgone conclusion that Open Source zealots/geeks are responsible for the virus. It doesn't mention any alternative theories at all and the only hint is a brief comment towards the end of the article that there is no proof that Linux geeks wrote the virus.
Overall a surprisingly poor piece of journalism from the BBC.
(Note : I do not object at all to someone putting forward the theory that MyDoom was written by one or more people from the Open Source community. What I object to here is that something which is highly contentious is portrayed pretty much as fact and no mention of alternative possibilities is made.)
I have written a short, polite, note complaining about the article.
Tux should sue the BBC for slander and defamation of character. Now that would be an entertaining headline.
The fact is someone with intimate knowledge of the Windows OS created the MyDoom virus on a Windows PC with Windows development tools. Any reasonable person would, therefore, have to put Linux "zealots" on the bottom of the suspect list. The news media has never been known for being reasonable, however. Sensationalism is what sells.
anyway someone wrotte that if m$ buy $co. linux open source will have more trouble than hardware drivers... i mean sco made plublicity against linux ´coz it´s illegal, M$ is doing a big bIG BIG campaign againt linux actually....but as linux is more fair than the others ,$co and M$, will be absolute OS.... IBM has implanted a linux lab in brazil to develop new softwares to their open source computers.... But i´m still not happy with linux ´coz all the games that i love are on the fuck*** M$ OS (buaaaaah!)as Star Wars´games....
Originally posted by setlec_seta i´ve got one queestion!! What is hurd?
The Hurd is the GNU equivalent of Linux. Remember that Linux is, technically, only the Operating System kernel. Originally, GNU software was meant to build up to an entire OS. The apps got written first but the kernel was heavily delayed and Linux pretty much stepped into the gap.
The Hurd is now about 7 years old, from the first proper release, but hasn't really made much impact (as you'll guess since you haven't heard of it).
Originally posted by setlec_seta thanks for answering, friends ... and sorry i´m not a native english spoken and i´ve not practise my english for an age now....
Lesson one: There's a difference between ´ and '
It's also easier to read when you use paragraphs and a better punctuation. You don't need to save space. We have scroll bars if it doesn't fit on the screen.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.