New victim in Apple's run to sue everyone: Polish grocery store
GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
Distribution: Debian Sid AMD64, Raspbian Wheezy, various VMs
I know they don't care but this is an example of why I will never knowingly give Apple any money.
I have, in the past, toyed with the idea of one of their desktops as they have some advantages over Windows and Linux machines but I refuse to give my money to companies who behave like playground bullies.
Until now I just wasn't an Apple fan because of their overpriced products and their unwillingness to support their products on Linux, but when you look at that Wikipedia page about all the legal actions Apple was involved in (and how awkward some of them are/were) I have another reason to not like Apple.
It's all about greed with these big companies. They look for any possible means to make money from their products to patent trolling to suing. I bet they would even sue a little kid selling apple juice because the kid has an apple logo on their stand.
Well, I am glad that at least the thing about having a lower case i in a name was not successful, so I can keep my username.
Wait, I am sharing 3 letters with iPod, may be I should change it nonetheless before being sued over that.
That's absurd. Not to mention that the .pl domain is reserved for Polish websites; how can they sue a Polish grocery store for using a Polish domain name? Next they will sue apple trees for producing apples.
Yeah, that's funny, but not really a big surprise.
You do remember that Apple (the manufacturer of nice, but wildly overpriced tech baubles) and Apple (the record company set up by four lovable moptops, and, in no way a copier of any tech trinket rip-off merchants) did have a legal run in, years and years ago. One of the outcomes was that the then computer company Apple was not allowed to get into the music purveying business. Guess what they did once their iPod was what they wanted to sell. Yeah, that's right, just had a case of corporate amnesia about what they signed up to.
(On a vaguely related similar theme to the original post, a certain fast food company called McDonalds went to court against a Scotsman called McDonald who had a fish-and-chip shop (Eee-iii-ee-ii-ooo, more or less). Essentially, the judge told them to grow up. In an ideal world, that's what judges are for.)
They really are taking a big chance with their reputation
they are portraying themselves as 'corporate bad guys'; I'd guess that isn't who their target market wants to be buying from, or worshipping. You know, what with their 'be a rebel/1984 adverts'
and also as hypocrites - never nice
and in doing the anti-innovation thing, they are also less worship-able
and, for my money, the kicker is that non-techies have already been misreading the '...vs Samsung' case as meaning that the court has decided that the Samsung tablet is identical to the Apple device (not something the court was actually asked about, nor something on which they were competent to decide, but...), and so the Apple one can't be worth any more than the Samsung (I'll point out that this was predictable, in the sense that I predicted it, but I don't expect any kudos for that, given that I didn't put it on line)
What I don't know is if this is just the new management trying to follow the teachings of St Steve (and doing it less well) or whether they are trying to kick out in a new, more hard-line, hard-nosed, direction of their own.
Steve had decided he was going to '...kill...' Android, and that didn't happen, and, right now, it looks more likely that his organisation will destroy itself trying to make this last wish come true.
"I will spend my last dying breath if I need to, and I will spend every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank, to right this wrong," Jobs said. "I'm going to destroy Android, because it's a stolen product. I'm willing to go thermonuclear war on this."
That makes pretty clear that Apple is going down the Microsoft route.