GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Okay, After Windows media play (can't beat a pretty media player), edit.com is the best thing that Microsoft have ever made!
... I mean it!
Any way going back to *NIX stuff my first experience with vi was on SAM Linux trying to edit the settings (why are there distros that lock you out of root?). Sadly vi SAM only has the core binary for vi and none of the shared libs it needs so things like using backspace at the begging of a line failed to work and it added in D's and B's if I hit enter more than one time in a row. Very awkward.
But don't get me wrong I just converted from vim to gvim.
Last edited by iwasapenguin; 10-24-2007 at 07:24 PM.
Reason: just looked at grammer
I don't know if this has changed but Gentoo, the distribution I run, is very nano-centric and doesn't include vi on its installation disk - at least not since last I checked. It is an odd exception to the rule of vi being available everywhere (which it should be).
I got used to nano, which is easy to use but has less features than vi, and then I got into this environment at work where I had to telnet to an internal HP-UX machine, and then from there to a system on another network segment which ran some old version of Solaris. Each of those machines *only* had vi installed (well, they didn't have pico, nano, or emacs - maybe they had something older). I was forced to learn vi, which was infuriating at first, but it goes to show that, as several have pointed out, it is ubiquitous, or nearly so. vi is something that anyone can learn, but I can't say it is intuitive or user-friendly.
It's just that, if you do learn it, you can do a lot more with it than you can with nano. The time investment up front might be worth it. And you really don't want to ever encounter it, and have it be your only choice, in an emergency, having never used it before. This is how I first encountered it (in terms of having no choice but to use it), and it was not pleasant.
Me, I think the BANK STREET WRITER should be the default text editor on all operating systems.
Distos like Ubuntu won't let you log in normally as the root user since they are not really intended to be used by the technically inclined.
Instead if you have to do anything remotely useful in learning how the system fits together, su for everything.
Distos like Ubuntu won't let you log in normally as the root user since they are not really intended to be used by the technically inclined.
Instead if you have to do anything remotely useful in learning how the system fits together, su for everything.
I don't quite understand. Naturally you can create a root user.
Never mind though... This is the vi-vs-nano thread, right.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.