LinuxQuestions.org
Support LQ: Use code LQ3 and save $3 on Domain Registration
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 10-11-2012, 11:23 PM   #1
nec207
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2011
Posts: 96

Rep: Reputation: 0
Exclamation Microsoft to stop Linux, older Windows, from running on Windows 8 PCs !!!


Microsoft to stop Linux, older Windows, from running on Windows 8 PCs !!!


I will never support any company out there that has monoply and plays dirty like this no matter if 1,000,000,000 times better .

This is just wrong and no court lawsuit on this trust laws is major joke of the US political system of goverment and court run by neoconservative.


http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-sourc...ows-8-pcs/9589

What I don't get is why Microsoft cares !! If I buy computer and it has windows 8 on it and I hate windows 8 and put older windows on it or Linux what does Microsoft care they made their money !! Just like I can buy a computer with windows 8 and put the computer in the garage and never turn it on. They still made money of me.It sort of like if I gone to store buy mac computer from apple and put Linux has main OS on it or just never turn the computer on they still made money.

Or is this some kind of kick backs over the search engines giving cut of their profit to Microsoft over OS using the search engines .
 
Old 10-12-2012, 12:53 AM   #2
John VV
Guru
 
Registered: Aug 2005
Posts: 13,024

Rep: Reputation: 1740Reputation: 1740Reputation: 1740Reputation: 1740Reputation: 1740Reputation: 1740Reputation: 1740Reputation: 1740Reputation: 1740Reputation: 1740Reputation: 1740
you might want to do a bit of research

it is a way " over the top" way to "try" to stop rootkits and boot viruses from running on windows
the " basic idea" is not that bad
just the implementation , that sucks big time ( and is likely to CAUSE many many many law suits - think anti-trust on ARM cpu';'s)

Quote:
I will never support any company out there that has monoply and plays dirty like this no matter if 1,000,000,000 times better
do you where eye glasses ??? if so then YOU DO
 
Old 10-12-2012, 02:42 AM   #3
nec207
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2011
Posts: 96

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by John VV View Post
you might want to do a bit of research

it is a way " over the top" way to "try" to stop rootkits and boot viruses from running on windows
the " basic idea" is not that bad
just the implementation , that sucks big time ( and is likely to CAUSE many many many law suits - think anti-trust on ARM cpu';'s)


do you where eye glasses ??? if so then YOU DO
What does rootkits and boot viruses have do with it? A proper OS does not get rootkits and boot viruses if has no read or write access . Now BIOS getting rootkits and boot viruses is other story.
 
Old 10-12-2012, 05:57 AM   #4
TobiSGD
Moderator
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Hanover, Germany
Distribution: Main: Gentoo Others: What fits the task
Posts: 15,592
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 4047Reputation: 4047Reputation: 4047Reputation: 4047Reputation: 4047Reputation: 4047Reputation: 4047Reputation: 4047Reputation: 4047Reputation: 4047Reputation: 4047
Not another thread about Secure Boot, we have already answered most questions about this here: http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...ge-4175417476/

Quote:
just the implementation , that sucks big time ( and is likely to CAUSE many many many law suits - think anti-trust on ARM cpu';'s)
Would you please be so kind to elaborate what in the implementation of Secure Boot exactly sucks?
And would you please be so kind to explain why there should be anti-trust law suits against Microsoft in a market where they a) have no monopoly and b) it is common practice by almost any vendor to lock down the devices?
 
Old 10-12-2012, 06:39 PM   #5
NyteOwl
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2008
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Distribution: Slackware, OpenBSD, others periodically
Posts: 512

Rep: Reputation: 139Reputation: 139
The only ARM machines that are locked to Windows 8 are those that bear the Windows certification logos and ship with Windows pre-installed. If you intend on running something else on ARM hardware, just don't buy a unit with Win 8 pre-isntalled and there won't be any issue.

It5 would be interesting to see if the Microsoft keys used by Ubuntu et al would permit use of such hardware.
 
Old 10-14-2012, 11:26 AM   #6
273
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2011
Location: UK
Distribution: Debian Sid AMD64, Raspbian Wheezy, various VMs
Posts: 3,411

Rep: Reputation: 794Reputation: 794Reputation: 794Reputation: 794Reputation: 794Reputation: 794Reputation: 794
I am interested whether this:
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...cs-4175432030/
will mean that other OSs can boot on Windows ARM devices also.
 
Old 10-14-2012, 04:11 PM   #7
linux_BSD
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2012
Posts: 47

Rep: Reputation: 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by nec207 View Post
Microsoft to stop Linux, older Windows, from running on Windows 8 PCs !!!


I will never support any company out there that has monoply and plays dirty like this no matter if 1,000,000,000 times better .
Yet, you seem to have the MS logo on many of your posts. Don't worry I am not a linux zealot. It doesn't bother me what OS anybody uses. I do agree that a secure boot feature is wrong. I don't care if it is by MS or any other company. If a person buys a computer I feel they should be able to put anything on it and not be restricted even if it's MS intentions to protect your windows 8 PCs.

I don't use windows anymore but when I did in the past I rarely got viruses and malware because I was careful and proactive and I didn't have an IE explorer with tons of third party toolbars where many of them are malware.

Last edited by linux_BSD; 10-14-2012 at 04:34 PM.
 
Old 10-14-2012, 09:09 PM   #8
sundialsvcs
Guru
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: SE Tennessee, USA
Distribution: Gentoo, LFS
Posts: 5,397

Rep: Reputation: 1114Reputation: 1114Reputation: 1114Reputation: 1114Reputation: 1114Reputation: 1114Reputation: 1114Reputation: 1114Reputation: 1114
In the quest for a "flaming headline," the poster apparently forgot that (a) the feature can be turned-off, and (b) operating systems other than Microsoft's can be compatible with it.

Even though you might equate this particular type of machine with one operating system, believe it or not, there is a world "beyond Microsoft." Dozens of operating systems run on this type of cheaply-available hardware ... and, they always will.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: Windows 8 belongs on older PCs like a fish needs a bicycle LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 08-17-2012 12:50 AM
trying to install freespire on older computer (was running windows 2000) ratbike1970 Linux - Newbie 1 11-27-2008 09:05 AM
LXer: Microsoft U-turn to stop Linux dominating ultra low cost PCs LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 05-10-2008 08:41 AM
Newly opened windows openining below older windows. betamaxman Suse/Novell 2 12-11-2006 08:51 PM
asus p4p800 e deluxe LAN stop running on WINDOWS after shutting down from SUSE 9.3 KURY Linux - Hardware 2 11-18-2005 05:04 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:02 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration