LinuxQuestions.org
Did you know LQ has a Linux Hardware Compatibility List?
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Search this Thread
Old 11-21-2005, 01:26 AM   #1
hedpe
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Pittsburgh
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 378

Rep: Reputation: 30
maxtor or western digital?


Hi,

I was speaking with a friend today that claims Maxtor > WD for reliability of hard drives. I am wondering how many other people have found this true. I am currently running a RAID-0 on top of two WD SATA drives and *knocks on wood* no problems in a year. Regardless, I still backup every other night.

Thanks!
George
 
Old 11-21-2005, 02:12 AM   #2
Charred
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: Utah, USA
Distribution: Slackware 11
Posts: 816
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 30
I prefer Seagate, then Maxtor.
 
Old 11-21-2005, 02:21 AM   #3
holetholet
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Posts: 6

Rep: Reputation: 0
both also ok wat.......
 
Old 11-21-2005, 02:42 AM   #4
BittaBrotha
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2002
Location: Third Stone from the Sun
Distribution: Debian Sid, SourceMage 0.9.5, & To be Continued on a TP
Posts: 800

Rep: Reputation: 31
Yes I have used and like both drives.
 
Old 11-21-2005, 03:24 AM   #5
reddazz
Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: N. E. England
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, Debian
Posts: 16,298

Rep: Reputation: 73
Both are good. I have used more Western Digital drives than Maxtor but prefer Seagate.
 
Old 11-21-2005, 04:59 AM   #6
Electro
Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,042

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
If people said that one mechanical hard drive manufacture is more reliable than the other mechanical hard drive manufacture, then they are complete idiots. The amount of mechanical hard drives that are reliable in this world is none. If you want a reliable hard drive, look into solid state hard drives. I never will say that mechanical hard drives are reliable because they are just not. Mechanical hard drives eventually fail. The question is when is very, very hard to answer.

For speed (low accessing times or very low latency) for an OS, I will either buy IBM/Hitachi or Western Digital hard drives. Throughput never is good for an OS drive. RAID-1 is good to use for an OS or file server because two or more files can be access at the same time while RAID-0 can only access one file at a time. People do not know any better because they think higher the throughput the faster the system will go.
 
Old 11-21-2005, 05:48 AM   #7
emit
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 5

Rep: Reputation: 0
Ive had two Maxtors fail on me before but never a Seagate, WD from my experience make the most noise.
 
Old 11-21-2005, 07:18 AM   #8
purelithium
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Canada
Distribution: Mandriva 2006.0
Posts: 390

Rep: Reputation: 30
Every single Maxtor drive I and other members of my family/friends have owned in the past 5 years has failed in some way or another within a few months of the warranty expiring. I've had 2 go on me in the past 3 months alone. I will not ever buy maxtor again.

edit: There was no mistreatment of these drives, they have been used in normal small business or home settings, no undue stress put on them.

They might be cheap drives, but I would rather spend the extra money and know that my data will be safe.

Look at how many "refurbished" maxtors are on this site:

http://www.tigerdirect.ca/applicatio...0Disk%20Drives

I know it might not be an accurate example, but just the pure fact that I rarely hear people complain about seagate/wd as much as maxtor.

I have switched to Seagate, and am quite impressed with their products. fairly cheap for excellent features.

Last edited by purelithium; 11-21-2005 at 07:24 AM.
 
Old 11-21-2005, 07:36 AM   #9
Brian Knoblauch
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Distribution: SuSE (x86), NetBSD (Sparc), Solaris (Sparc & 32-bit x86)
Posts: 278

Rep: Reputation: 30
My list is Seagate > IBM (Hitachi does the drives now?) > Western Digital.

Did have a bad batch of WD's one time, and yes, even Seagates fail sometimes. However, I've had quite poor luck with Maxtor's not even lasting a year. Hard drives in general seem to be much less reliable than they used to be.

As another side note, I've had better luck with SCSI than ATA, *except* for 15k rpm SCSI drives which seem to be the least reliable overall (really hard to keep them cool).

I wish I had kept track of all the exact numbers on these things, would have been interesting to see if my above "feelings" are accurate or not

Last edited by Brian Knoblauch; 11-21-2005 at 07:38 AM.
 
Old 11-21-2005, 08:49 PM   #10
J.W.
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Distribution: Mint
Posts: 6,642

Rep: Reputation: 69
Moved: This thread is more suitable in General and has been moved accordingly to help your thread/question get the exposure it deserves.

Mod note: Not truly a Linux question. Recommendation requests are fairly subjetive, and obviously each person's view will be highly skewed by his/her own experiences. For my 2 cents, I'd go with WD
 
Old 11-21-2005, 08:54 PM   #11
KimVette
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Lee, NH
Distribution: OpenSUSE, CentOS, RHEL
Posts: 1,794

Rep: Reputation: 46
Quote:
Originally posted by Electro
If people said that one mechanical hard drive manufacture is more reliable than the other mechanical hard drive manufacture, then they are complete idiots.
Judge by the standard warranty a manufacturer offers. Seagate offers a minimum of 5 (five) years across the board - 7 years on some models. That a company is willing to take on a liability like that tells you that their MBTF may be reliable, vs. the likes of Western Digital or Maxtor who knocked the warranty on many|most of their products to one year.
 
Old 11-21-2005, 09:15 PM   #12
BarfBag
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD, USA
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 100

Rep: Reputation: 15
I've had both Maxtors and Western Digitals and don't have a problem with either one of them. The only real difference I can tell is that the Western Digital is a lot quieter, even though it's a bigger hard drive (Maxtor = 120 GB, WD = 160 GB).
 
Old 11-22-2005, 09:46 AM   #13
slantoflight
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2005
Distribution: Smoothwall
Posts: 283
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 35
Quote:
Originally posted by Electro
Throughput never is good for an OS drive.
Am I actually seeing this? Because something about that just sounds wrong.
 
Old 11-22-2005, 10:57 AM   #14
bioalchemist
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Distribution: mandriva
Posts: 106

Rep: Reputation: 15
My favorite HD so far is a Samsung 160Gb SATA drive. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16822152020
I have had 3 Maxtors fail me, but they will all eventually give up the ghost. If I get another HD soon, it will be a Samsung.
 
Old 11-22-2005, 11:21 AM   #15
Brian Knoblauch
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Distribution: SuSE (x86), NetBSD (Sparc), Solaris (Sparc & 32-bit x86)
Posts: 278

Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
Originally posted by bioalchemist
My favorite HD so far is a Samsung 160Gb SATA drive. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16822152020
I have had 3 Maxtors fail me, but they will all eventually give up the ghost. If I get another HD soon, it will be a Samsung.
I didn't even know I had any Samsungs until one failed last night... Ah well, it was a fairly old 2GB drive.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Western digital drivers Darthbudge Linux - Newbie 6 11-26-2005 07:21 PM
Western Digital USB harddrive. RoaCh Of DisCor Linux - Hardware 3 01-28-2005 05:26 PM
Adding a new Western Digital 160gig harddrive. barton Linux - Hardware 3 12-12-2004 07:51 PM
Western Digital WD 80 gb - secondary IDE no 80 conductor dushkinup Linux - Hardware 1 04-07-2004 10:29 AM
Western Digital USB External HD not Mounting zakmtbike Linux - Hardware 5 03-08-2004 07:21 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:34 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration