GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
How to Remove Linux and Install Windows on Your Computer
This article describes how you can remove the Linux operating system from your computer, and install a Windows operating system. This article also assumes that Linux is already installed on the hard disk using Linux native and Linux swap partitions, which are incompatible with the Windows operating system, and that there is no free space left on the drive.
Windows and Linux can coexist on the same computer. For additional information, refer to your Linux documentation.
Apparently, it is the Linux community's responsibility to show you how to dual-boot Windoze and Linux. It is also Linux's fault that Windows doesn't support the partitions. And, most laughable, there are users who want to switch from Linux to Windows...
So what if people want to go from Linux to Windows, isn't Linux and the philosophy behind Linux all about choice? The article doesn't say that Windows not supporting Linux partitions is Linux's fault anywhere - what makes you think this? It is also possible that Windows tech support realise that it is easier to use a Linux bootloader to set up a dual boot system than mess about with the Windows boot loader and so tell you to read your distributions documentation which is different from distro to distro. It is easier to point to articles specifically written for your chosen distribution than write an artical that is more general, therefore hass less detail, covering all distributions
I put it to you that you found this article because you are indeed one of those users who want to go from Linux and Windows and were searching for articles how to do it. I also think there is no point to this thread, unless you have a specific question to ask?
There are good reasons to remove linux from a drive.
Like if you have windows games that just won't run in cedega and need more hard drive space but you've filled up your disks with ten different linux distros.
In this case removing ONE of them would be okay
Originally posted by duane534 Apparently, it is the Linux community's responsibility to show you how to dual-boot Windoze and Linux. It is also Linux's fault that Windows doesn't support the partitions. And, most laughable, there are users who want to switch from Linux to Windows...
Originally posted by Starch Why doesn't Windows support Linux partitions?
1. Microsoft preaches interoperability but in practice snuffs it out whenever possible.
DR-DOS (Caldera/SCO DOS) (isn't it ironic that Caldera/new SCO used to be a HUGE proponent of Open Source and at one time insisted that MS-DOS source should be open?)
Novell NDS client in Win9x
Constantly breaking backwards-compatibility in M$ Office file formats
DirectX vs. OpenGL
MSN (search engine) favoring IIS servers over Apache
MSIE not supporting CSS2/2.1
2. Microsoft would be forced to open up the source of at least SOME of Windows if they were to implement EXT and Reiser and XFS in Windows.
3. Microsoft would be admitting to the legitimacy of Linux
Microsoft doesn't support it, but who expects them to?
Although Windows-NT (in its various flavors) is owned by a somewhat clueless company, as an operating-system it isn't bad. If you strip away layers of marketing c*r*a*p that it's been saddled with, it does its job well enough.