LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 05-31-2010, 11:38 AM   #1
fruitwerks
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2009
Posts: 80

Rep: Reputation: 15
Looking for the right NAS


I currently have a Dell PE2850 - maxed out with 1TB of RAID5. This has lasted for about 3 years, being very conservative with what I decide to archive. I am looking into a NAS solution and I am planning to sell my 2850.

I was hoping to find something within the $200-300 range (Diskless) but I am having trouble doing so. Yes there are plenty of them out there, but none of them have the features I am looking for. I noticed most of them have buggy or limited firmware, or not enough capacity or options.

Here is what I am looking for;

RAID 0, 1, (5,10?)
Two Bays will be fine if it can handle 2TB drives, but 4+ would be best.
Expandable ram for cache / or Dedicated Cache ram
Support for managing how the disks are configured, partitioning and file systems, LVM possibly.
nfs, smb, rsync, ftp, ssh (at least busybox?) / web ui
'Low Power' is a must.

The ability to run a torrent client maybe
Possibly dual 1GB nics with 'teaming / bridging' support
Possibly a Bay for DVD/ Blu-ray
Maybe a Wi-fi as an AP

I don't want to watch a video in the browser, and I don't need streaming support for game consoles, or AFP... So really it looks like I want to build a big bulky file server like I already have. This is not the case. I have seen a few ATOM based boards, but I think performance would suffer with such a wimpy processor.

I have looked into older rack mount systems, like the ML11x series, but that may be expensive by the time I am done. I don't care if this is a 4U system, or setup in a wooden box - I just want some massive redundant storage without the power draw, the PE2850 has two 700W PSU's and if I take one out, it only runs for about 5 minutes almost idle...

Thanks All
 
Old 05-31-2010, 12:21 PM   #2
cantab
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2009
Location: England
Distribution: Kubuntu, Ubuntu, Debian, Proxmox.
Posts: 553

Rep: Reputation: 115Reputation: 115
Why not build your own low power system? Since you think the Atom is 'wimpy', think about the low-power variants of AMD's desktop processors, which consume about 45 Watts. Linux can do software raid, which avoids the need to get specific hardware.
 
Old 05-31-2010, 12:49 PM   #3
fruitwerks
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2009
Posts: 80

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
I was expecting an answer like that. I guess I will go with a 'headless' system. I have a PSU that I can use, don't care about a case for now. I will need to find an older system and spend a bit on a nice SATA RAID card, I don't want fakeRAID!

I'll update this post as the project progresses! - I'm still open to hardware suggestions, case / chassis ideas. Also any OS suggestions are welcome. I am not very fond of package based distros, but I am open. I am an experienced Linux admin so I am not afraid to compile everything.

Thanks Again!
 
Old 05-31-2010, 03:30 PM   #4
fruitwerks
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2009
Posts: 80

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
I think I will be going with a Chenbro RM414 for a case. It will scale well. If I pack it full of 2TB drives, I can get up to 28TB in a raid5. I can start with cheap hardware and sell it as I upgrade

I can get that case for $150 - all bays / slides functional, CD-RW or DVD-RW + Floppy, but no mobo / psu.

I think that is a good deal, anyone think otherwise?
 
Old 05-31-2010, 03:40 PM   #5
cantab
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2009
Location: England
Distribution: Kubuntu, Ubuntu, Debian, Proxmox.
Posts: 553

Rep: Reputation: 115Reputation: 115
It does seem like a lot of your budget on just the case. But I won't deny that it looks very capable. After the cost of a quality PSU you're not left with much for mobo, CPU, and RAM.

A bit related - with 16 drives I'd suggest RAID6 not 5, so you can tolerate a double failure - which if multiple drives are bought at a time may be more likely than you'd expect if failures were uncorrelated.
 
Old 06-23-2010, 03:32 PM   #6
fruitwerks
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2009
Posts: 80

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Yep that is a budget killer, I didn't get the case yet - but he still has it

I'm going with a very minimal setup to start with, just ordered an Atom 330 mobo. with 2gb of ram and a 2tb drive. The board has one pci slot, and I need that for a second NIC. In about a week I can order another drive so I can mirror.

Going to use lvm2 / dmraid until I fill up 2tb - then I will need to get a real mobo and a very expensive controller

I'll keep you all posted!
 
  


Reply

Tags
diy, nas, raid



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Buffalo NAS - how do we get files on NAS syncing with Windows Sync? bykerbob Linux - Newbie 0 10-21-2008 08:59 PM
Looking for NAS Device gjblackford Linux - Hardware 3 04-10-2008 08:33 AM
Nas saavik Linux - Enterprise 6 02-27-2007 04:17 AM
How does a NAS exactly work? xpucto Linux - Hardware 5 01-15-2007 03:36 AM
NAS-like Software digity Linux - Software 2 06-12-2006 08:46 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:32 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration