LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 10-07-2004, 04:05 AM   #1
spooler
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Posts: 3

Rep: Reputation: 0
Linux & Windows Boot process, Comparision ?


Hi, new here and new to the world of Linux.

What are the similarities and differences in boot processes of these two operating systems ?

Thanks
 
Old 10-07-2004, 05:05 AM   #2
320mb
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: pikes peak
Distribution: Slackware, LFS
Posts: 2,577

Rep: Reputation: 48
here's a noticable difference...........

when I boot windows.......Norton Anti-virus takes 30+ seconds to
scan all files before the GUI loads...........

Linux does not need to do this at all...........
 
Old 10-07-2004, 12:32 PM   #3
spooler
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Posts: 3

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Norton AV is a 3rd party software, right ? That cant be considered as a diff.
 
Old 10-07-2004, 12:49 PM   #4
justin_p
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: Virginia, USA
Distribution: slack 13; I've used it all :)
Posts: 433

Rep: Reputation: 30
that's correct. Plus you can turn off the inital NAV scan. I think one of th main differences is that windows os is now the gui. They are essentially one i the same. In linux when you boot up it starts the kernel, which goes through it's littany of checks and balances. Each distro can have different things added that increases the boot time (kudzu in RH/FC, /sbin/ldconfig in slackware, etc.). Then you need to add in the X system. But on the other hand, when you are presented with a log in screen in windows the computer is continuing to load things in the background since there is only one gui. In linux it waits to for you to log in and specify a gui to use. plus you factor in all the config files. Also once you are presented with your desktop in windows it continues to load things for up to a minute. Linux is ready go.

If anyone can add to this please. By the way, here my respective boxes

Work (Windows 2K Pro):
Dell Dimension Desktop
P4 2.4 GHZ
512 mb DDR
80 gb HDD

Home (Slackware w/ DLG):
(I built this one myself)
Athlon XP 2400+
1 gb SDRAM
40 gb hdd
NVIDIA Gefore2 400 MX
 
Old 10-07-2004, 04:43 PM   #5
spooler
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Posts: 3

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Nice post Justin !

Anybody else have an opinion on this ?
 
Old 10-07-2004, 05:24 PM   #6
Tinkster
Moderator
 
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: earth
Distribution: slackware by choice, others too :} ... android.
Posts: 23,067
Blog Entries: 11

Rep: Reputation: 928Reputation: 928Reputation: 928Reputation: 928Reputation: 928Reputation: 928Reputation: 928Reputation: 928
Not another one of those ... :/

Moved since it's not really a Linux-question.
 
Old 10-07-2004, 09:45 PM   #7
spooler
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Posts: 3

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Quote:
Originally posted by Tinkster
Not another one of those ... :/
You mean its already discussed ? I've searched the forums twice, going through 9-11 pages of results.

If its already discussed, a link would help.
 
Old 10-08-2004, 08:04 AM   #8
otchie1
Registered User
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Posts: 560

Rep: Reputation: 30
I think trickster was on about it being another one of those 'which is better, Linux or XP?' threads which can run and run.

It's not really a Linux question in that it doesn't address a problem you are having and want to either share a solution or ask for help on.

The boot processes for both M$ and the various Linux distros are heavily documented elsewhere and the details are certainly beyond my grasp.

The bottom line is that once Linux finishes booting, it lets you log on and then stays up forever whereas XP continues to load files after the GUI logon and can get a bit flaky after a few days or not depending on the moon and the tides - XP it seems is a bitch whereas Linux is just bitchin'. ;-)
 
Old 10-09-2004, 12:02 AM   #9
spooler
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Posts: 3

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
He he that last line was pretty funny

Thats one difference by otchie. Appreciate your help.
 
Old 10-09-2004, 05:02 AM   #10
Haiyadragon
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Gorredijk, Netherlands
Distribution: Arch Linux
Posts: 400

Rep: Reputation: 30
Linux does things one at a time and when it's done you can log in. Windows just runs everything at the same time and is still doing that when you're already logged in. Windows seems faster to startup, but that's just an illusion.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Linux boot up process Vs. Windows boot up process darkskull Linux - Software 7 12-30-2006 04:21 PM
Solution Dual Boot Windows & Linux [ALL DONE IN WINDOWS] No Linux terminology DSargeant Linux - Newbie 35 02-07-2006 03:29 PM
How to boot into multi Linux & Windows olkar Linux - Newbie 9 11-20-2005 11:12 PM
Solution Dual Boot Windows & Linux [ALL DONE IN WINDOWS] No Linux terminology DSargeant Linux - Newbie 4 11-10-2005 11:37 AM
Windows/Linux comparision for science project danny_beta_read General 14 05-03-2004 11:19 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:04 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration