| General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun! |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
|
05-30-2003, 12:48 AM
|
#16
|
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: just outside reality
Distribution: balanced
Posts: 752
Rep:
|
this is funny. salvation from lindows? lmao
|
|
|
|
05-30-2003, 08:24 AM
|
#17
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jul 2002
Location: a tiny place caled hendrik ido ambacht in the netherlands
Distribution: SuSE, debian, slackware, lfs
Posts: 1,358
Rep:
|
This thing gets more and more complex. The bottom line though is, SCO has a snowballs change in hell to win this. But then again as was pointed out before, they probebly don't intend to win.
|
|
|
|
05-30-2003, 10:08 PM
|
#18
|
|
Guru
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: South Alabama
Distribution: Fedora / RedHat / SuSE
Posts: 7,154
Rep:
|
|
|
|
|
05-31-2003, 12:38 AM
|
#19
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: The Real Washington
Distribution: Ubuntu, Debian, SuSE, UnSlung, Android
Posts: 1,819
Rep:
|
Am I the only one that smells the hand of microsoft all over this? It seems like a great way for a monopoly to attack the up and comer. Insite a piss ant company like SCO to attack the image of Linux. This seems more about the movement than the money.. SCO is scared of Unix losing to Linux in the server market (It will), and Micosoft has been a little nervous about its position in the server market as well.
Am I just a conspiracy nut, or does anyone else see this?
|
|
|
|
05-31-2003, 03:29 AM
|
#20
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jul 2002
Location: a tiny place caled hendrik ido ambacht in the netherlands
Distribution: SuSE, debian, slackware, lfs
Posts: 1,358
Rep:
|
Oh absolutly I do. For microsoft it's about harming the name of Linux. About spreding Fear doubt and uncertainty. It think the longer this goes on, the more harm it will do. Novell and Lindows just complicated things. Which means the legal battle will take even longer. Woulden't it be better if IBM would end this right now, by beying SCO. To just get over it. Then again that's exactally what SCO wants.
|
|
|
|
05-31-2003, 06:20 AM
|
#21
|
|
Member
Registered: May 2002
Location: New Hampshire
Distribution: Fedora Core 6 X86-64
Posts: 82
Rep:
|
linux illegal?
I doubt that it is. I can remember when there was ms-dos and dr. dos. different os's but same commands. I don't recall any challenges to dr. dos from microsoft. Maybe there were, but I don't recall any.
This SCO thing is getting very suspicious. Especially after microsoft got into a deal with them shortly after the suit against ibm.
|
|
|
|
05-31-2003, 06:29 AM
|
#22
|
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Everett
Distribution: Slackware 13.37
Posts: 785
Rep:
|
IBM buying out SCO would be an admission of guilt by IBM and do more harm than good in the long run. IBM and Linux would both end up with a 'tainted' image; Linux more than IBM since Linux depends more on reputation than marketing.
IBM(and Linux) needs to defeat SCO in court with a clear judgement.
Personally I hope IBM stomps SCO into nothing more than a greasy stain on the 'information superhighway' 
|
|
|
|
05-31-2003, 06:30 AM
|
#23
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jul 2002
Location: a tiny place caled hendrik ido ambacht in the netherlands
Distribution: SuSE, debian, slackware, lfs
Posts: 1,358
Rep:
|
I thinks you are wrong steved123. M$ did sabotage dr dos. Apps creaded my ms that ran on top of dos mysteriusly creashed on dr dos. M$ probebly did that on porpose.
|
|
|
|
05-31-2003, 07:47 AM
|
#24
|
|
Member
Registered: May 2002
Location: New Hampshire
Distribution: Fedora Core 6 X86-64
Posts: 82
Rep:
|
dr.dos vs. ms-dos
I was only talking about legal action by microsoft against dr. dos. I don't think microsoft took any legal action against the dr. dos people. Maybe they did but I don't recall any. Incompatiblity is another issue.
|
|
|
|
05-31-2003, 10:59 AM
|
#25
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: The Real Washington
Distribution: Ubuntu, Debian, SuSE, UnSlung, Android
Posts: 1,819
Rep:
|
After reading the letter from Novell, it sounds like Novell is here to help. They have a big investment in Linux and the jist I got from the letter is that they are only interested in preventing damage from SCOs smear campaign. I didn't get the impression that Novell would turn around and pull a similar stunt once this matter is resolved. It's in Novells interest to play nice with the Linux community if they want their services to survive in the server market.
We as Linux users are finally being seen as a demographic worth fighting for. That says something great about the progress of the Linux movement. No longer can Microsoft say Linux is no threat without looking foolish.
|
|
|
|
05-31-2003, 09:14 PM
|
#26
|
|
Guru
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: South Alabama
Distribution: Fedora / RedHat / SuSE
Posts: 7,154
Rep:
|
I agree, Movell is on our side. They also seem to be talking legal action against SCO if they continue the bs.
|
|
|
|
06-01-2003, 06:23 AM
|
#27
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jul 2002
Location: a tiny place caled hendrik ido ambacht in the netherlands
Distribution: SuSE, debian, slackware, lfs
Posts: 1,358
Rep:
|
No I don't doubt Novell is on our side. I just pointed out this got a bit complex with all these parties involved. And I fear that because of that, this thing will take even longer.
|
|
|
|
06-01-2003, 09:16 PM
|
#28
|
|
Guru
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: South Alabama
Distribution: Fedora / RedHat / SuSE
Posts: 7,154
Rep:
|
I am thinking it may help Linux in a way.
All the people who use Linux coming together to stand up and fight for the right to use free software.
|
|
|
|
06-04-2003, 06:23 PM
|
#29
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: The Real Washington
Distribution: Ubuntu, Debian, SuSE, UnSlung, Android
Posts: 1,819
Rep:
|
If Linux is illegal, god it's good to be a criminal....
The matrix doesn't have me anymore. :-)
This SCO thing is making people say "what's Linux".
Free advertising for Linux...Cool
Last edited by Pcghost; 06-06-2003 at 09:13 PM.
|
|
|
|
06-06-2003, 01:49 PM
|
#30
|
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: just outside reality
Distribution: balanced
Posts: 752
Rep:
|
chris dibona was named by linus to checkout the sco code they say. good guy chris, i always liked him when hes on tech tv in fact it was he that got me started on linux. he'll figure out whats up.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:46 AM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|