LinuxQuestions.org
Did you know LQ has a Linux Hardware Compatibility List?
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 04-28-2002, 04:15 PM   #1
CragStar
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2000
Location: UK - Frome
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 1,081

Rep: Reputation: 45
Wink Hurd about this?


I have just read about the release of a truely GNU microkernel which RMS (Stallman) has released. Called Hurd (get the title now? )

Apparently this fulfils RMS's dream of a truely GNU system as opposed to a GNU/Linux system (which is what we really should be saying).

Tell me if I'm wrong here, but isn't this just more diversity which we don't really need. We have seen the trouble of specific distro kernels being produced, and some of the enhancements they have made not being put back into the orginal kernel.

Will anybody care about this new microkernel? Will it create more confusion? Will it be actually used?



Just how far do you take your beliefs and put them into practice?

www.gnu.org/software/hurd/
 
Old 04-28-2002, 10:55 PM   #2
gui10
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2001
Distribution: enigma, slack8
Posts: 677

Rep: Reputation: 30
my opinion:
it's not even ready! and it started even before linux came into the picture.

i think it was James McCormack who commented on VRML, that a bunch of ideal standards alone are almost useless. get something concrete going and then work on it from there.

time and again, it has been proven that there is wisdom in those words.

Last edited by gui10; 04-28-2002 at 11:01 PM.
 
Old 04-28-2002, 10:58 PM   #3
gui10
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2001
Distribution: enigma, slack8
Posts: 677

Rep: Reputation: 30
eg. this extract from the website http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/faq.en.html#s1:

start of extract:
1.7. Why is `/usr' a symbolic link to `.'?

{MB} The distinction between `/' and `/usr' has historical reasons. Back when Unix systems were booted from two tapes, a small root tape and a big user tape. Today, we like to use different partitions for these two spaces. The Hurd throws this historical garbage away. We think that we have found a more flexible solution called shadow filesystems. Unfortunately, support for shadowed filesystems is not yet implemented.
:end of extract


this does not impress me given that this project has been around longer than linux has. and that linux has matured much more than this.

Last edited by gui10; 04-28-2002 at 11:02 PM.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
linux vs the hurd? rafc Linux - Newbie 3 04-16-2004 07:55 PM
What is hurd? argh2005 General 2 09-25-2003 08:00 PM
Gnu/hurd d33pdream General 1 02-10-2003 02:26 AM
take that: Linux vs Hurd? el_felipe Linux - Distributions 5 02-14-2002 07:18 AM
have you HURD? fatpig General 3 01-18-2002 01:55 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:41 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration