GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
View Poll Results: How social are social groups here at LQ?
They are not social at all and that's fine with me
I was asked about the point of social groups here. Well, actually, there is no one point, it's that every member of a social group is a point and interaction between them makes social groups valuable, of course how valuable they will be depends on every single point.
I'll post the simplest example; recently I was looking all over the net for some good Debian wallpapers. Now do you think I should've started a new thread in Debian Forum here at LQ about that or if social groups here were more alive, I could've done that there and then exchange few links and/or whatnot. After all, as some have said, technical forums should be technical and I agree with that, to a certain degree, that is.
Your example is one reason why I am against personal blogs and social groups: It scatters (valuable) information.
People come to LQ to find information and a majority of the users are new to this site and will focus on the forums and not start looking at (specific) social groups and/or personal blogs. I also believe that LQ's search functionality only covers the forum and does not include social groups/blogs (is google allowed to index those???).
Keeping the information in the forums is the way to go, scattering it among the forums, blogs and social groups will only make it harder to find.
As always: My 2c.
BTW: Your first action should have been: Searching LQ and after finding 4 (useless) threads you should have started a new thread
Last edited by druuna; 05-23-2011 at 01:35 AM.
Reason: Clarity in text
Hi,
Your example is one reason why I am against personal blogs and social groups: It scatters (valuable) information.
People come to LQ to find information and a majority of the users are new to this site and will focus on the forums and not start looking at (specific) social groups and/or personal blogs. I also believe that LQ's search functionality only covers the forum and does not include social groups/blogs (is google allowed to index those???).
Keeping the information in the forums is the way to go, scattering it among the forums, blogs and social groups will only make it harder to find.
This is the message I was trying to express in Post #27. The only help I could see in a group is getting one on one help. I know even in the Newbie forums it can be intimidating to an unknowledgeable person to ask for help when he has no idea how or where to start.
I had managed to come here on and off for a while and never notice that there were such things as social groups - perhaps that is part of the reason they are not very social, nobody notices them
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.