LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices

View Poll Results: How do you feel about open source versus freeware (closed-source)?
I never use anything that I can't get the source of. 0 0%
I prefer to use open source, but I'm willing to use freeware if there isn't another option. 20 90.91%
I use Windows, but only use open source applications. 0 0%
I use Windows, and prefer open source but am willing to use freeware if necessary. 1 4.55%
I don't care, as long as I don't have to pay and it works. 1 4.55%
Voters: 22. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 03-15-2014, 07:59 PM   #1
maples
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2013
Location: IN, USA
Distribution: Arch, Debian Wheezy
Posts: 372

Rep: Reputation: 100Reputation: 100
How do you feel about open source versus freeware?


I thought it would be interesting to see how people here think about open source versus freeware. I'm really new to Linux, and if it wasn't for the people here, I'd still be wondering what a partition is.

Feel free to rant, elaborate, recommend things, etc. (but then again, it's not my forum )
 
Old 03-15-2014, 08:11 PM   #2
frankbell
Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Virginia, USA
Distribution: Slackware, Mageia, Mint
Posts: 7,604

Rep: Reputation: 1438Reputation: 1438Reputation: 1438Reputation: 1438Reputation: 1438Reputation: 1438Reputation: 1438Reputation: 1438Reputation: 1438Reputation: 1438
I have used the Opera browser for years, and it's not open source. I also recommend various freeware applications for Windows users, such as Foxit Reader in lieu of Acrobat Reader.

You have to work and play in the real world.

Aside:

Today, I had my first encounter with the new Opera on my daughter's Windows box. It was . . . disturbing. I think I now understand this.

Last edited by frankbell; 03-15-2014 at 08:15 PM.
 
Old 03-15-2014, 09:40 PM   #3
cwizardone
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2007
Distribution: Slackware64-current & "True Multilib." PC-BSD.
Posts: 2,233

Rep: Reputation: 176Reputation: 176
Quote:
Originally Posted by frankbell View Post
...Aside:

Today, I had my first encounter with the new Opera on my daughter's Windows box. It was . . . disturbing. I think I now understand this.
My are aren't you the diplomat?

 
Old 03-16-2014, 12:07 AM   #4
bcwagne
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2008
Distribution: Debian, OSX, PCBSD
Posts: 162

Rep: Reputation: 31
I'm afraid I'm one of those who uses open source, freeware, and even some paid/closed/non-free(libre) apps. MS Office being the most notable among those. I admit I haven't tried LibreOffice since the break away from OpenOffice, and it might be better now, but I just couldn't stand OpenOffice. It just didn't work well for me.

I like the idea behind OSS, but the application leaves much to be desired. In order to get content production done and out the door, I use what works, and more often than not, that means being somewhat more pragmatic than I'd like. Also I'm a poor student, and the school gives a VERY hefty discount on MS/Adobe products, to the point that it is worth it to use them rather than have to fight with formatting issues in the OSS alternatives.

Although for programming I use the GNU stack, and it works well.
 
Old 03-16-2014, 08:53 AM   #5
s.verma
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2013
Distribution: Gentoo, Arch, Debian
Posts: 133
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 21
In theory I recommend using open source software to me (and other than me) instead of closed source/proprietary apps.
But in practice I do never hesitate if there is some closed source application available whose open source alternative is either not available or is not developed up to mark so far.

I have used Windows XP/7 with MS Offices etc. for my college works and still sometime uses them. In daily life (majority of time) I use linux+GNU+Open_Source+Some_Closed_Source(if required).
 
Old 03-16-2014, 11:31 AM   #6
metaschima
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2013
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,096

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
I would have liked another option, but I do use FLOSS almost exclusively. Right now I'm not using anything closed-source. The only thing I sometimes use in flash player because I have to for some things, but this is rare. Hopefully shumway or something like it will make the accursed plugin obsolete. I guess it probably will be replaced by HTML5 + DRM, which isn't any better.

There are definitely reasons to stay away from it:
http://it.slashdot.org/story/14/02/1...ed-for-7-years
 
Old 03-17-2014, 09:10 PM   #7
sundialsvcs
Guru
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: SE Tennessee, USA
Distribution: Gentoo, LFS
Posts: 5,348

Rep: Reputation: 1105Reputation: 1105Reputation: 1105Reputation: 1105Reputation: 1105Reputation: 1105Reputation: 1105Reputation: 1105Reputation: 1105
Well, first of all, "open source" is not free!"

Linux ... Apache ... MySQL ... SQLite ... PHP ... Perl ... Ruby ... [ etc ... ]

ALL of these things that we oh-so depend on ... ALL of these things are not "free!" Every single one of them has been valued in the millions of dollars, even though they are "open source."

These valuations are real. And, conservative.

There is no such thing as "freeware."

Computer software is not (!!!) "free." Fact is, it's probably the most-expensive thing that there is.

Many years ago now, the computer software industry realized that the only way that it could actually make money, doing what it is doing, is: "a rising tide lifts all boats." Instead of paying a closed group of developers to work on a closed body of source-code (and trying, vainly, to pay for the whole thing by means of licenses ...), do the exact opposite: open-up the source-code, open-up the effort, and do it all under the auspices of legally-recognized licenses which stipulate that the work-product thus produced can never be closed."

It was ... and still is ... a truly radical commercial concept.

And, as for "the boots-on the-ground commercial success of this idea," simply grab that electronic thing that is right-now in your pocket. All of the recent advances that we now enjoy in the field of personal electronics are directly attributable to: "cooperative development == open source."

"Cooperative development," today, has nothing more to prove, to anyone in the world. It works. Commercially. Profitably.

... and, thanks to legally well-tested licenses, it will forever remain so.

All of us share in the benefits of software, when we silently and equally absorb its (terrible!) costs, and when we mutually agree that no one will (or, can ...) ever erect "PRIVATE PROPERTY" signs. There's simply no other way by which any of us could hope to do what, today, we do.

Last edited by sundialsvcs; 03-17-2014 at 09:21 PM.
 
Old 03-17-2014, 11:52 PM   #8
Randicus Draco Albus
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2011
Location: Sitting in front of my computer.
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,113
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 270Reputation: 270Reputation: 270
I agree with sundialsvcs' point. What is freeware? I have never seen that reference before. Open source, free software, FLOSS, but never freeware.

As for the poll.
Quote:
I use Windows, but only use open source applications.
How the hell can someone use Windows without using any closed source software?
 
Old 03-18-2014, 12:37 AM   #9
cwizardone
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2007
Distribution: Slackware64-current & "True Multilib." PC-BSD.
Posts: 2,233

Rep: Reputation: 176Reputation: 176
^^
Almost every open source application I use is available for windows. Open source developers know to write for the 800 pound gorilla (m$-windows), as it gives them the greatest possible audience, i.e, exposure for their "product."

Last edited by cwizardone; 03-18-2014 at 12:50 AM.
 
Old 03-18-2014, 03:47 AM   #10
s.verma
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2013
Distribution: Gentoo, Arch, Debian
Posts: 133
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 21
Quote:
Originally Posted by sundialsvcs View Post
Well, first of all, "open source" is not free!"

Linux ... Apache ... MySQL ... SQLite ... PHP ... Perl ... Ruby ... [ etc ... ]

ALL of these things that we oh-so depend on ... ALL of these things are not "free!" Every single one of them has been valued in the millions of dollars, even though they are "open source."

These valuations are real. And, conservative.

There is no such thing as "freeware."

Computer software is not (!!!) "free." Fact is, it's probably the most-expensive thing that there is.

Many years ago now, the computer software industry realized that the only way that it could actually make money, doing what it is doing, is: "a rising tide lifts all boats." Instead of paying a closed group of developers to work on a closed body of source-code (and trying, vainly, to pay for the whole thing by means of licenses ...), do the exact opposite: open-up the source-code, open-up the effort, and do it all under the auspices of legally-recognized licenses which stipulate that the work-product thus produced can never be closed."

It was ... and still is ... a truly radical commercial concept.

And, as for "the boots-on the-ground commercial success of this idea," simply grab that electronic thing that is right-now in your pocket. All of the recent advances that we now enjoy in the field of personal electronics are directly attributable to: "cooperative development == open source."

"Cooperative development," today, has nothing more to prove, to anyone in the world. It works. Commercially. Profitably.

... and, thanks to legally well-tested licenses, it will forever remain so.

All of us share in the benefits of software, when we silently and equally absorb its (terrible!) costs, and when we mutually agree that no one will (or, can ...) ever erect "PRIVATE PROPERTY" signs. There's simply no other way by which any of us could hope to do what, today, we do.
Dear sundialsvcs,
I could not get it. Although one can sell the source code and hence open source is not synonymous with free (price). But in practice we usually get them as a freeware product. I am using open source and I haven't paid for anything.

So how open source code is not also free in terms of price in practice?
 
Old 03-18-2014, 04:22 AM   #11
cascade9
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2011
Location: Brisneyland
Distribution: Debian, aptosid
Posts: 3,718

Rep: Reputation: 903Reputation: 903Reputation: 903Reputation: 903Reputation: 903Reputation: 903Reputation: 903Reputation: 903
Quote:
Originally Posted by sundialsvcs View Post
There is no such thing as "freeware."
There most certainly is 'freeware'.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freeware

Quote:
Originally Posted by Randicus Draco Albus View Post
What is freeware? I have never seen that reference before. Open source, free software, FLOSS, but never freeware.
Did the link explain it?

I've had a few hilarious exchanges that touch on freeware/FLOSS with some fairly ignorant people on other forums. The standout was when someone basicly ranted about the 'death of freeware' because of parted magic going to 'fee to d/l'.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sundialsvcs View Post
Instead of paying a closed group of developers to work on a closed body of source-code (and trying, vainly, to pay for the whole thing by means of licenses ...), do the exact opposite: open-up the source-code, open-up the effort, and do it all under the auspices of legally-recognized licenses which stipulate that the work-product thus produced can never be closed."

It was ... and still is ... a truly radical commercial concept.
Well, maybe 'radical' if you come from a commercial background.
 
Old 03-18-2014, 06:11 AM   #12
sundialsvcs
Guru
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: SE Tennessee, USA
Distribution: Gentoo, LFS
Posts: 5,348

Rep: Reputation: 1105Reputation: 1105Reputation: 1105Reputation: 1105Reputation: 1105Reputation: 1105Reputation: 1105Reputation: 1105Reputation: 1105
We all "come from a commercial background," because we do things in order to get paid money to do it.

"Cooperatively-developed software" is a commercial endeavor into which hundreds of millions of dollars' worth of development and maintenance effort has been, and is being, poured. Nothing's "Free."

We're doing things this way because it works, when no other business model did.
 
Old 03-18-2014, 06:53 AM   #13
cascade9
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2011
Location: Brisneyland
Distribution: Debian, aptosid
Posts: 3,718

Rep: Reputation: 903Reputation: 903Reputation: 903Reputation: 903Reputation: 903Reputation: 903Reputation: 903Reputation: 903
Quote:
Originally Posted by sundialsvcs View Post
We all "come from a commercial background," because we do things in order to get paid money to do it.
Ideology.

Sciencetific research has worked in a very different way for centuries. You cant just say 'look, here a box, it converts lead into gold' and call it science. Just because modern software has evolved in a more commericalised system than science did doesnt mean that 'closed systems' where you cannot see or find out what is actually happening is the norm.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sundialsvcs View Post
"Cooperatively-developed software" is a commercial endeavor into which hundreds of millions of dollars' worth of development and maintenance effort has been, and is being, poured. Nothing's "Free."

We're doing things this way because it works, when no other business model did.
So, there is 'hundreds of millions of dollars' worth of development and maintenance' on closed source OSes, programs, etc., which last I checked were doing quite fine thank you, but the closed source business model doesnt work? Shenanigans.

In the long term, IMO, open source is much better, but the rise of open source doesnt mean the closed source business model is dead.
 
Old 03-18-2014, 08:45 AM   #14
sundialsvcs
Guru
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: SE Tennessee, USA
Distribution: Gentoo, LFS
Posts: 5,348

Rep: Reputation: 1105Reputation: 1105Reputation: 1105Reputation: 1105Reputation: 1105Reputation: 1105Reputation: 1105Reputation: 1105Reputation: 1105
No, no, quite obviously the closed model does work. But cooperative development gave us ... Linux, Apache, MySQL, the core of OS/X, Android ... the list goes on and on and on.

We wouldn't be where we are today in the computer industry were it not for this business model and the products it has produced. Instead of putting up fences and charging for tickets to get in, we did exactly the opposite ... and mandated that "tickets could never be required by anyone." In this way, we created a rising tide that lifts all boats.

It's not the right business model for many things; even, for most things. But, in the situations where it is appropriate, I submit that it has enabled us to do things that otherwise would never have been feasible.
 
Old 03-18-2014, 03:14 PM   #15
mostlyharmless
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2008
Distribution: Slackware 14.1 (multilib) with kernel 3.15.5
Posts: 1,528
Blog Entries: 12

Rep: Reputation: 171Reputation: 171
I'm not sure the poll answers really cover my preferred response, which would be

"I prefer to use open source, but I'm willing to use closed source, including Windows, if there isn't another option."

"Freeware" as in free like beer, is another question entirely. Closed source freeware can be fine, proprietary graphics drivers probably being the most commonly used. Open source but not freeware, if that is a category, would presumably mean, for example RHEL. Or you can voluntarily support your favorite projects, which I strongly encourage.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Distinguish between freeware, shareware, open source software and closed source ... turbomen Linux - Newbie 1 11-16-2010 02:49 AM
LXer: Open source and Java feel first Sun cuts LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 01-23-2009 03:50 PM
open-source or freeware RAR 3.x implementation? Axion Linux - Software 5 03-31-2004 06:43 PM
Best of Windows Open Source Freeware... TheFishingGeek General 2 06-30-2003 01:38 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:13 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration