GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
I have avoided MS games just because of that type of thing and I have a feeling they install more than just the game. I can imagine the MS game creators having access to parts of the OS that others dont.
It will affect Linux, from a gamer perspective. It won't be a big surprise either if Microsoft eventually drops support for DirectX on WinXP and 2K, forcing gamers to upgrade to their newer OS. While there are very few games that I love from MS, I still could live without them. But if every company out there developing games also starts to make Vista-Only games, that could lead into a problem. First, MS operating system aren't getting any cheaper nor light weight. Second, nearly every gamer will have to upgrade their system only to run the newest MS Operating system. And unless you are still running those P1 - 166 MHZ, upgrading hardware is expensive :\
Your theory sounds very interesting and also makes a lot of sense. It's very uncommon to see Microsoft Games (and CO such as Bunggie) running under Cedega, like Halo itself or Flight Simulator, for example
Count me on it peter_89. I'm not going to upgrade my "gaming" PC to Vista. I have nothing against Windows, but forcing peoples to upgrade for no apparent reason, as you put (and very well) is an injustice.
Actually they won't be dropping DirectX. What they are doing is crippling OpenGL in every way they possibly can to force vendors to use their inferior DirectX API.
A lot of game companies (other than Microsoft) still make games that are supported under Win 98. There's no practical benefit by running a game in an upgraded OS if the underlying API you use remains the same.
I think the latest version of DirectX is supported under Win 98, isn't it?
A few games don't support Win98 though. Doom 3 doesn't, I think . Though, considering the great support ID software gives to Linux, I could care less if they offer support to MS operating systems . Other companies still make use of older DirectX versions also.
I really have the feeling that MS will get into trouble with Vista. At least, I hope they do