GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
View Poll Results: Are you willing to help people whose grammar is horrible?
Posts with improper grammar are absolutely appalling. No, I won't help people who post gibberish.
Over here I have noticed that some newbies to Linux have posted some very improper grammar and expected to receive help for their problems. How many of you are willing to help users who do not capitalize, do not punctuate, and do not post enough info?
Speaking for myself, and *maybe* for some of our more experienced/frequent posters (I certainly don't speak for everyone, or even most people), we try to encourage such users to mend their ways a bit, while at the same time addressing their question.
It's not a good idea to make the first reply to a post simply to berate a member for using crappy grammar, spelling, or posting an impossibly vague question, and leave it at that. Instead, if you/we think you/we can begin to address the question itself (even if only to ask for a lot of clarification), AND give some guidance about how to correct their posting style, that would be ideal.
This usually involves the first reply to such posts, doing the following: asking for more information, and asking/suggesting that the offender please try to their ability, to type clearly and to use some punctuation.
Usually the problem gets corrected to satisfactory levels, sometimes surprisingly so; and sometimes (rarely) a poster insists on using near-incomprehensible writing and showing complete disregard for punctuation and caps. In the latter cases, many members probably decide to ignore threads by such people. ( I specifically recall a member who deliberately refused to use ANY punctuation or newlines AT ALL, because they felt they "didn't have to" )
I would suggest too, that it isn't necessarily/always 'linux newbies' who are guilty of this; rather, it can be someone (perhaps with lots of linux/computer experience) whose English skills are lacking because it is not their native language, or someone who is accustomed to using TExTiNg/AOL/cell-phone/Lee7-speak, and doesn't realize that such speak isn't conducive to getting help on a forum like LQ.
Anyhow, I for one am still willing to try to help.
For me effective communication is more important than style.
That apparently simple statement becomes more complex:
LQ is international and many of our users are not native speakers; they can understand standard English more easily than its variants; if they use machine translation, standard English can be translated more effectively.
Non-standard English is less precise than variant English. Some of the variations make a virtue out of imprecision/sloppiness (an interesting social phenomenon perhaps reflecting aversion from the self-discipline necessary to write standard English) and words/representations are in flux.
LQ posts show some correlation between language choice and clarity of thought. People who routinely use less-precise English variants may be less capable of clear thinking because their language-based thinking does not have a precise toolset.
For me effective communication is more important than style.
Agreed. The real problem arises when a post is so garbled that it makes little or no sense, thus eliminating effective communication entirely. In addition, things like texting shorthand are just irritating to many of us.
Quote:
LQ posts show some correlation between language choice and clarity of thought. People who routinely use less-precise English variants may be less capable of clear thinking because their language-based thinking does not have a precise toolset.
That's very interesting. Please post further or PM me on that topic, if you have the time and inclination.
I really get annoyed with all the l33t h4x0r, and text messaging shorthand that passes for proper English around here. These l33t-speak posts also tend to be totally devoid of anything resembling a punctuation mark as well.
This has become a growing problem for the Ubuntu forums at ubuntuforums.org also.
If English is not the poster's first language, then I can excuse it. The really embarrassing thing is, many of these these people with the nonexistent writing skills are American college students! These people actually believe that this is the normal way to write!!
Is it any wonder why America lags behind almost every European country in academic achievement??
Newbie who doesn't know enough yet to ask the right question.
Native english speaker with poor writing skills/deliberate use of shorthand.
Of these, the last is the only one I will often ignore completely.
Agreed with this, but I'll try and give at least one chance... if they appeciate the help and attempt to be useful then I'll continue to help them. Others will just be ignored.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.