LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 03-04-2005, 08:13 PM   #1
mhelliwell
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2005
Location: Canada, eh!
Distribution: Puppy Linux 1.x.x
Posts: 75

Rep: Reputation: 15
GPL Question


I have a question about the GPL and I don't want "as far as I know..." or "from what I heard..." type answers. I want some one who knows what they are talking about.

My question (which may seem simple, but i'm a noob)...

If I include a COPY of the GNU GPL, can I resell someone else's Linux, e.g. If sally downloads a SuSe ISO and burns it to a CD, Can Sally sell it to Joe, if she gives Joe a copy of the GNU GPL?

I am sorry if the answer to this is obvious.

Last edited by mhelliwell; 03-04-2005 at 08:15 PM.
 
Old 03-04-2005, 08:23 PM   #2
amosf
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Australia
Distribution: Mandriva/Slack - KDE
Posts: 1,672

Rep: Reputation: 46
If you download a gpl copy of any linux distro or app you can sell it to whoever you want. Do a search for GPL license and it lists this fairly clearly in plain language.
 
Old 03-04-2005, 09:44 PM   #3
AlexV
Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: New Lenox, IL
Distribution: Fedora Core 4; Ubuntu 5.10 (Breezy Preview); CentOS 4
Posts: 81

Rep: Reputation: 15
According to the GPL:

Quote:
You may charge a fee for the physical act of transferring a copy, and you may at your option offer warranty protection in exchange for a fee.
So, yes, you can. However, you must make it clear that it is free software and inform them of where they can download the source code.
 
Old 03-05-2005, 02:36 AM   #4
reddazz
Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: N. E. England
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, Debian
Posts: 16,298

Rep: Reputation: 73
If the distro includes commercial software, you may have to remove it because most of it is not licensed using the gpl and redisributing it can cause you to violate the vendors license.
 
Old 03-05-2005, 02:01 PM   #5
Mara
Moderator
 
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: Grenoble
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 9,535

Rep: Reputation: 148Reputation: 148
Quote:
Originally posted by AlexV

So, yes, you can. However, you must make it clear that it is free software and inform them of where they can download the source code.
In fact you don't have to if you give them access to source code youself (for example on a cd). The method you describe is the easiest one and most common, but not the only one
 
Old 03-14-2005, 01:48 PM   #6
mhelliwell
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2005
Location: Canada, eh!
Distribution: Puppy Linux 1.x.x
Posts: 75

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Where could I get the source code?
 
Old 03-14-2005, 02:26 PM   #7
reddazz
Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: N. E. England
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, Debian
Posts: 16,298

Rep: Reputation: 73
Source code for most distros or applications is available from the developers website or on other media such as cd/dvd.
 
Old 03-18-2005, 11:37 AM   #8
shadow_wwp
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: China
Distribution: Turbo & LFS
Posts: 5

Rep: Reputation: 0
you can't do that . the GPL is "Gates Private License "
 
Old 03-19-2005, 03:11 AM   #9
prasanta
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: India
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 368

Rep: Reputation: 37
Go through the GNU GPL before doing any resaling or you land yourself admist copyright laws. The distro may contain some properitry software also.

http://www.gnu.org/licenses/licenses.html#GPL

-Prasanta
 
Old 12-09-2012, 09:08 AM   #10
LicenseQuestions
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2012
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mara View Post
In fact you don't have to if you give them access to source code youself (for example on a cd). The method you describe is the easiest one and most common, but not the only one
This post substantially answere my question (posted elsewhere). For some people new to open source and in agreement with the pricipals/concept of the GNU public license there is one area not clearly explained: If you comply with the requirement to make any modifications available via download can someone demand a copy via physical disk (at reasonable cost). This would be an unreasonable request and I suspect people would not be required to comply if same sofware were available for download.
 
Old 12-09-2012, 10:23 AM   #11
gnashley
Amigo developer
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: Germany
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 4,749

Rep: Reputation: 461Reputation: 461Reputation: 461Reputation: 461Reputation: 461
You must provide accesss to the sources *for a reasonable amount of time*. The only way to be sure of this is to provide it yourself.
 
Old 12-11-2012, 08:47 AM   #12
sundialsvcs
Guru
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: SE Tennessee, USA
Distribution: Gentoo, LFS
Posts: 5,256

Rep: Reputation: 1076Reputation: 1076Reputation: 1076Reputation: 1076Reputation: 1076Reputation: 1076Reputation: 1076Reputation: 1076
Sure ... distros can be packaged and sold; happens all the time. The purpose of licenses like GPL is not to say that you can't make a profit, but that you can't make something proprietary that was derived from GPL-licensed code.

Companies contribute very valuable time and effort for "a rising tide that lifts all boats," on the legally enforceable stipulation that no one will take the work-product of their contributed efforts and turn it into a proprietary product, which of course would be a case of exploiting that material without compensation.

Remember: the "F" in FOSS is a misnomer. Open-source software most certainly isn't free, and no one should be implying that it somehow is. Hundreds of thousands of hours of work have been poured into the goodies we use every day, because it was realized that no one person or company could get the job done that needed doing, if they were obliged to singularly pay their bills and profits thereby as in the conventional business model. But many 'ones' could, and did.

That realization, coupled with several legally-proved open source license agreements, broke open the logjam that had been holding software and hardware development back for many years.

Last edited by sundialsvcs; 12-11-2012 at 08:51 AM.
 
Old 12-12-2012, 09:30 AM   #13
jens
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Belgium
Distribution: Debian, Slackware, Fedora
Posts: 1,190

Rep: Reputation: 159Reputation: 159
Quote:
Originally Posted by LicenseQuestions View Post
This post substantially answere my question (posted elsewhere). For some people new to open source and in agreement with the pricipals/concept of the GNU public license there is one area not clearly explained: If you comply with the requirement to make any modifications available via download can someone demand a copy via physical disk (at reasonable cost). This would be an unreasonable request and I suspect people would not be required to comply if same sofware were available for download.
Since many software (including the kernel) is GPL version 2 -only ...yes (doing what Mara said avoids this).
GPLv2 was written before downloading sources was doable for most people.

This changed in GPL version 3 (this also counts for anything GPLv2 that doesn't include GPLv2-only)

I *really* doubt anyone would care though (...and even more if it would work in court...).[0]
Most people just ignore this rule (how else could "live-cds" exist).

[0] Linus Torvald's "GPLv2-only" claim is questionable as well.

Last edited by jens; 12-12-2012 at 11:36 AM.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GPL question Drakkath Linux - General 1 06-24-2005 04:02 AM
Simple question about the GPL uman Programming 5 01-28-2005 02:29 PM
what GPL says? 286 Linux - Newbie 1 01-26-2004 05:24 PM
Question concerning the GPL lordronky Linux - Software 5 01-03-2004 08:33 PM
Anyone know anything about the GPL? - quick question... BrianK General 1 09-29-2002 10:26 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:23 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration