LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 04-25-2002, 05:51 AM   #1
gui10
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2001
Distribution: enigma, slack8
Posts: 677

Rep: Reputation: 30
gpl and bsd license


what is the diff? i can't really see it... is it that the source code doesn't necessarily have to be distributed if it is under the BSD license?
 
Old 04-25-2002, 03:11 PM   #2
Mara
Moderator
 
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: Grenoble
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 9,535

Rep: Reputation: 148Reputation: 148

The difference is that MS can "borrow" code from programs on BSD and use it without publishing it.
 
Old 04-25-2002, 03:26 PM   #3
jeremy
root
 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 10,311

Rep: Reputation: 2611Reputation: 2611Reputation: 2611Reputation: 2611Reputation: 2611Reputation: 2611Reputation: 2611Reputation: 2611Reputation: 2611Reputation: 2611Reputation: 2611
This is a highly debated topic that is quite complex. The following link goes into the gory details.

http://www.softpanorama.org/Copyrigh...on/index.shtml

--jeremy
 
Old 04-25-2002, 08:36 PM   #4
gui10
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2001
Distribution: enigma, slack8
Posts: 677

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
thanks! i've been wondering for a long time...
 
Old 04-25-2002, 08:46 PM   #5
neo77777
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Dec 2001
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Distribution: *NIX
Posts: 3,704

Rep: Reputation: 55
As it stated in "Linux + Study Guide" BSD license unlike GPL allows modifications to be destributed under other licenses.
 
Old 04-25-2002, 09:55 PM   #6
gui10
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2001
Distribution: enigma, slack8
Posts: 677

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
hm, just read the article... as with any other thing, once it gets bigger, it's one idealism vs another... and the only thing we can be sure about it is that most people on the ground will suffer. Rosseau wasn't very much wrong about social contract... geez...

sounds like much ado about nothing except for a perspective that should be considered. the gpl already has a practical place in society... personally, i don't think we need extremist proponents nor entrenched opposition to bother us with it.

Last edited by gui10; 04-25-2002 at 10:10 PM.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GPL license pangfai Linux - General 4 05-08-2006 06:23 AM
GPL License - Is this OK? photoguy123 Linux - General 1 11-07-2005 06:13 PM
How to get GPL license to my program? zahoo Linux - Software 2 10-17-2005 03:25 PM
GPL license questions Rotwang Programming 12 07-05-2005 08:09 PM
QT to be released under the GPL license jeremy Programming 4 03-16-2005 03:39 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:15 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration