Quote:
My point is you cannot trust either free providers or paid providers.
Let me put it this way. Even if a paid provider stopped their service tomorrow, there is nothing I can do about it pracically even though there is a theoritical legal right.
|
Thank you!
This is what I am trying to say.
Quote:
A lot of times the cost of enforcing the right in terms of time, money and effort may not be worth the fight.
|
This is true in most cases really. Legal fees will outway any benefit unless dealing with high value stuff.
Quote:
First, the belief that he/she is entitled to keep using a free service. Believe it or not, a company is not obligated to continue a free service after starting it. Being foolish enough to use any of Google's offerings does not entitle the user to anything, except being exploited by Google.
|
A paid service is really no safer. I don't know why people don't understand it
but paid services can go away too
Quote:
Second is the belief that it is wrong for a company to stop a service, because continuing to provide a free service is the right thing to do. Google is not an altruistic company. It is an avaricious and dishonest company that makes money by collecting and stealing every bit of information they can get hold of and selling it. Mentioning Google and philanthropy in the same sentence is ridiculous.
|
In this case it IS wrong.
Quote:
It is an avaricious and dishonest company that makes money by collecting and stealing every bit of information they can get hold of and selling it.
|
This is very true. They have proven this again and again.
My complaint isn't so much the service being discontinued. The gripe I have is the loss of data.
If they just made it read only and kept the archive up, I would just say "oh well".
This is also a good demonstration on why I will never trust cloud storage.
[