| General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun! |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
|
09-05-2008, 07:56 AM
|
#31
|
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2006
Distribution: Debian, Maemo
Posts: 341
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AceofSpades19
I think the yahoo page is too cluttered with stuff I'll never use, googles is nice and simple
|
You could go straight to search.yahoo.com, that's pretty clean. Or bookmark this link (the url in your area may vary) in firefox and give it a keyword like 'yah' and next time you can just type 'yah football scores' in a tab and it'll feed that straight to yahoo search.
I made a big move away from google sometime back, I was worried it was getting too much of my info. I found decent desktop or web alternatives for Reader, Gmail, search, etc, and my mind's been more at peace since then.
Last edited by arungoodboy; 09-05-2008 at 07:57 AM.
Reason: poor grammer corected
|
|
|
|
09-06-2008, 05:07 AM
|
#32
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2002
Distribution: t2 - trying to anyway
Posts: 2,541
Rep:
|
The german 'departement for IT security'(or so) has warned the chrome shouldn't be used for everyday browsing - at least in it's current state.
There are so far 6 critical security holes and the browser communictes nonstop with google sending even keystrokes back there according to them.
That doesn't necessarily mean that google wants to know all your keystrokes but right now they do.
|
|
|
|
09-06-2008, 06:18 AM
|
#33
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2007
Location: Russia
Distribution: Slackware 12.2
Posts: 1,202
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by arungoodboy
You could go straight to search.yahoo.com, that's pretty clean. Or bookmark this link
|
Does yahoo search support filtering of search ("-word" to return results without word "word"), "and", "or", advanced operators ("inurl:", "intitle: link:", "allinurl:", "site:", "cache:")? If not, it's not google search alternative (people often tend to recommend any kind of serach engine that they think is "good", but doesn't support all this somewhat advanced stuff I need).
Last edited by ErV; 09-06-2008 at 06:30 AM.
|
|
|
|
09-06-2008, 10:10 AM
|
#34
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,171
Rep: 
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mega Man X
Found this on the wikipedia:
Google confuses me so much. I never know if they are the good guys or the bad guys. Either way, I think their marketing share when it comes down to search engine is... well... unhealthy at best. It scares me how much I use it, at home and at work. I simply don't use any other search engine, that feels bad. I better google for other google alternatives 
|
It is irrelevant. They have gained a great deal of power and that makes them dangerous regardless of their intentions. Intentions can change literally overnight. Capability takes a lot of time to develop.
You should safeguard yourself against google just as you do against any other potential threat.
Given Google's propensity for collecting information and NEVER discarding it, I don't trust them at all. For that reason if no other I won't run chrome.
|
|
|
|
09-06-2008, 10:36 AM
|
#35
|
|
Guru
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,706
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by crashmeister
The german 'departement for IT security'(or so) has warned the chrome shouldn't be used for everyday browsing - at least in it's current state.
There are so far 6 critical security holes and the browser communictes nonstop with google sending even keystrokes back there according to them.
That doesn't necessarily mean that google wants to know all your keystrokes but right now they do.
|
Heh, that is cool. Of course they don't want to know your keystrokes, what possible use could they have for such data ?
|
|
|
|
09-06-2008, 10:48 AM
|
#36
|
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2006
Distribution: Debian, Maemo
Posts: 341
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ErV
Does yahoo search support filtering of search ("-word" to return results without word "word"), "and", "or", advanced operators ("inurl:", "intitle: link:", "allinurl:", "site:", "cache:")? If not, it's not google search alternative (people often tend to recommend any kind of serach engine that they think is "good", but doesn't support all this somewhat advanced stuff I need).
|
There's only two in your list that I use real often ( '-word' and 'site:'), and yahoo supports both those. Ok, I admit the results are not always as good as I'm used to getting with google, but its got pretty decent stuff for a power user.
|
|
|
|
09-06-2008, 12:11 PM
|
#37
|
|
Guru
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,706
|
Google produces very good results for web sites, but for images I prefer ask.com. Google image search often turns up random unrelated images.
|
|
|
|
09-08-2008, 03:01 PM
|
#38
|
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2008
Location: Phoenix
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 799
Rep: 
|
Short answer:
Yes, Google is evil
Long Answer:
Google is evil for many reasons. One being that it is a corporation. By US law, corporations are legal entities. That makes them a person with no soul. People with no souls (re animated dead for example) are generally evil (think pet cemetery).
I suppose in some ways it isn't evil like for offering code for Open Source (how can it be open source then offer so many copyright stipulations??)
darn... well my break is over but you guys can fill in the rest.
|
|
|
|
09-08-2008, 03:29 PM
|
#39
|
|
Guru
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,706
|
Corporations, much like other imaginary entities, are controlled by people and used to do whatever people want to do ... destroy, cause suffering, break laws, make laws etc., the fun stuff you know. And then when it's time to blame someone, well of course the corporation is responsible, so shoot the corporation by firing squad, the workers get laid off, the CEO runs away to Brazil with his share and whatever he could steal and starts a farm (coke, weed, whatever he prefers).
|
|
|
|
09-08-2008, 07:47 PM
|
#40
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2007
Location: Chilliwack,BC.Canada
Distribution: Slackware64 -current
Posts: 2,079
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lumak
Short answer:
Yes, Google is evil
Long Answer:
Google is evil for many reasons. One being that it is a corporation. By US law, corporations are legal entities. That makes them a person with no soul. People with no souls (re animated dead for example) are generally evil (think pet cemetery).
I suppose in some ways it isn't evil like for offering code for Open Source (how can it be open source then offer so many copyright stipulations??)
darn... well my break is over but you guys can fill in the rest.
|
They aren't that evil, people just like calling the evil because their motto is do no evil, if they were evil they would do stuff like bribe iso, spread FUD around everything etc.
|
|
|
|
09-08-2008, 08:09 PM
|
#41
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2007
Location: Russia
Distribution: Slackware 12.2
Posts: 1,202
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lumak
Short answer:
Yes, Google is evil
|
Define what you call "evil".
|
|
|
|
09-09-2008, 02:30 AM
|
#42
|
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2008
Location: Phoenix
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 799
Rep: 
|
Lets consult wikipedia
*reading wikipedia*
la la la
Evil
Evil
Evil
Yes Google....
wait a second....
There is also a class of deliberate acts, known to be harmful to another, which are not considered evil because:
1. they are acts of self-defense or defense of another
2. they are considered justified; see Just War
My bad. Google is just defending it self. How could I be so wrong! All hail Google. (prays to the logo sitting next to the search bar on his browser window.) how sad is that... firefox's (aspell??) spell checker even corrects 'google' to 'Google' instead of 'googol'. spellchecker doesn't even spit out 'googol'... just 'Google' (first), 'goggle', and 'go ogle'. IN FACT! it says 'googol' is spelled wrong! WTF! it's a conspiracy!
|
|
|
|
09-09-2008, 05:02 AM
|
#43
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2002
Distribution: t2 - trying to anyway
Posts: 2,541
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by H_TeXMeX_H
Heh, that is cool. Of course they don't want to know your keystrokes, what possible use could they have for such data ?
|
It's beta software and they might want to have as much info as possible why the browser crashed.
Thats the friendly version anyways.
|
|
|
|
09-09-2008, 05:09 AM
|
#44
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2006
Location: Siberia
Distribution: Slackware & Slamd64. What else is there?
Posts: 1,705
Rep:
|
Those who use google (at all) are destined to regret it!
https://ssl.scroogle.org
!
|
|
|
|
09-09-2008, 05:23 AM
|
#45
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2006
Location: Siberia
Distribution: Slackware & Slamd64. What else is there?
Posts: 1,705
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by crashmeister
It's beta software and they might want to have as much info as possible why the browser crashed.
Thats the friendly version anyways.
|
Here's the unfriendly version:
First there was racial profiling and then there was electronic profiling. Don't think everything you email and publish and post isn't processed and saved away for some dark rainy night.........
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:47 PM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|