GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
IE is heavily built into the windows operating system so when a page exploits the browser it can also get access to other things on the operating system. Since other browsers arent made this way exploiting them won't be as critical to your box
Just tellthem that most pop ups only work on IE due to the way they are scripited, as well as the built in pop up blocker. As stated erlier IE has many exploits. Also Mozilla, firefox, opera offer tabed browseing.
IE has been radically improved though since the release of Windows XP Service Pack 2. I like these debates but hate it when people get their facts wrong
Since SP2 has come out IE now ships with a very good (was better than Firefox at the time) popup blocker, much more restrictive access that web pages have to your computer and a ton of other things which were suprisingly good considering where they came from. Standards compliancy is still crappy if even existant and it doesn't yet have tabbed-browsing but the IE dev team has started a blog and judging from it they are planning to implement stuff that people are asking for.
Firefox is better hands-down but still, it's nice to see they are slowly starting to fix the mess that is IE
You know, xavier, that actually IS what converted most of my coworkers! It spread like wildfire. Of course we still use IE for a lot of things, some of our enterprise applications actually use IE for an interface...but for personal use, firefox made great strides. We don't discourage it's use on the network, which is a great first step.
More and more people (and I mean non-technical users) are beginning to see IE for what it really is: a piece of insecure, bloated and buggy software. The number of viruses some people get on their systems is unbelievable!
I have had people around me complain of viruses in Windows and slowly everybody realises that Windows + IE is the best way to infect a system and make the PC into nothing more useful than a huge paperweight.
Some of those systems were so far gone (in viruses, trojans, whatever) that the only way I recommended to them is to wipe out their hard disks and install other OSes. It is not always possible because people are using Windows applications for their work, then I get them to use a Firewall/Antivirus and also browsers other than IE.
IMO wether or not somethign is better becomes a subjective matter. You can argue until you are blue int he face and it won't matter. IMO let people use whatever the hell they want. If you don't like it too bad.
Originally posted by stabile007 IMO wether or not somethign is better becomes a subjective matter. You can argue until you are blue int he face and it won't matter. IMO let people use whatever the hell they want. If you don't like it too bad.
But then they want to get rid of viruses too. I think that people should be made aware that Windows allows so many viruses through in spite of so many updates and patches from Microsoft.
I have spoken to many people and the single most important reason they cite for wanting an alternative to browse the web is "virus attack"!
If linux had 90% of the market virus's would be just as numorous. I don't believe in an airtight program. If you are a virus writer which is cooler to say "OMG I just affected 5% of the computing world go me" or "Sweet! I just infected 40% of the computing world"