GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
The carrier weapon is not part of the destroyers arsenal of weapons.
Quote:
DDG 51 Class Features:
AEGIS Weapons System (AWS) including SPY-1 Radar, 96 cell MK 41 VLS, MK 99 Fire Control System
AN/SQQ-89 Sonar
MK 45 5� Gun for ASuW, AAW), and land attack (NSFS) targets
25mm CIWS and MK 38 self-defense guns
SLQ-32 or SEWIP Electronics warfare system
Helo landing capability (DDG 51-78); Dual Hangars for organic Helo support (DDG 79 and follow)
Four Gas Turbine Engines driving twin controllable propellers
Three SSGTG (Ship Service Gas Turbine Generators)
Robust, redundant, and survivable design with low signature requirements
Ship killer missles can be launched from miles away.
Quote:
The YJ-18 missile can cruise at about 600 miles an hour, or just under the speed of sound, only a few meters above the surface of the sea and then, about 20 nautical miles from its target, accelerate to as much as three times the speed of sound
Name calling and gesture baiting before a fight is high school shenanigans.
Hardly worth dying over.
Wait and see. Our navy is not the MH17 Malaysian plane.
Looks like the Poles asked us to be there.
Quote:
The American destroyer was operating alone at the time of the incidents, though there two Russian ships in the area, a frigate and an auxiliary intelligence gathering ship shadowing the destroyer, according to the official. It had left a port of call in Gdynia, Poland, to conduct the training exercise with the Polish helicopter.
I don't see the problem. Before you go whining on and on about the Russians, ....What the hell is the US doing there in the first place? You do not think that the US would do the exact same thing if the Russians were in US' back yard in the Caribbean or Atlantic, etc?
I really am getting rather tired of the US putting it's nose into everything, and eventually (as I stated in another thread) its just going to bite the US in the ass, and rightfully so.
Didn't the Poles also ask for nuclear weapons, which is another BUFFER country? hrmmmmmmmmm. I'm sure the Russians would gladly oblige... A missile or two in Warsaw ought to do just fine. And no I'm not just trolling...
"Russia 'simulates' nuclear attack on Poland
Russia has provoked outrage in Poland by simulating an air and sea attack on the country during military exercises. "
Go ahead, and get NATO in a full-on war against Russia. I still do not see Russia as being belligerent, sorry. The USSR technically is gone, so......Why is NATO still there?
I don't see the problem. Before you go whining on and on about the Russians, ....What the hell is the US doing there in the first place? You do not think that the US would do the exact same thing if the Russians were in US' back yard in the Caribbean or Atlantic, etc?
I really am getting rather tired of the US putting it's nose into everything, and eventually (as I stated in another thread) its just going to bite the US in the ass, and rightfully so.
As far as the Russians are concerned, that is still a buffer zone, plain and simple. Go tell to the Russians.... I surely would like to see the end result on that
So I ask again, why is NATO still around, wasn't the purpose of NATO to counter the USSR? Since the USSR is no-more, NATO should have also disbanded, why is NATO expanding? Of course Russia has a right to call out NATO, yet Russia is the aggressor? Explain please.. Please do.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.