LinuxQuestions.org
Support LQ: Use code LQ3 and save $3 on Domain Registration
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 01-26-2011, 09:20 AM   #1
zer0signal
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2010
Location: Cleveland
Distribution: Slackware, Fedora, RHEL (4,5), LFS 6.7, CentOS
Posts: 258

Rep: Reputation: 29
Fedora 15 - Changing Eth Device Naming Scheme!


http://digitizor.com/2011/01/25/fedo...device-naming/
 
Old 01-26-2011, 01:35 PM   #2
trickykid
Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2001
Posts: 24,133

Rep: Reputation: 199Reputation: 199
Quote:
Originally Posted by zer0signal View Post
So Matt Domsch said:
Quote:
The ethX naming scheme works fine as long as the system has only one Ethernet port. However if there are more than one Ethernet ports, a sort of race condition develops at every system boot and the ports may get their names in an arbitrary order.
This is why you put the damn HWADDR in each ifcfg-ethX config you terds, so they don't get swapped around after a reboot, etc.

Stupid if you ask me, the developers in Fedora-lala-land must be bored and out of ideas, so let's just change something that really wasn't an issue to begin with.
 
Old 01-26-2011, 01:39 PM   #3
zer0signal
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2010
Location: Cleveland
Distribution: Slackware, Fedora, RHEL (4,5), LFS 6.7, CentOS
Posts: 258

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 29
Agreed, what was wrong with either binding by MAC address... or setting a Udev rule? Obviously binding by MAC is the easiest and quickest way to accomplish that... And I believe most distro's do that by default during installs.. Supposedly Ubuntu is jumping on the bandwagon too.. Don't touch what is not broken!

sheesh!
 
Old 01-26-2011, 02:15 PM   #4
Jeebizz
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Distribution: Slackware 14.1 64-bit with multilib
Posts: 2,075

Rep: Reputation: 210Reputation: 210Reputation: 210
Red face Their nature is to break something or find something to break

Isn't this essentially the nature of these 'bleeding-edge' distros though? Unless they are not including experimental software/drivers in their distros they are messing things that shouldn't need to be messed with, to make it appear that something new has been added?
 
Old 01-26-2011, 02:21 PM   #5
zer0signal
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2010
Location: Cleveland
Distribution: Slackware, Fedora, RHEL (4,5), LFS 6.7, CentOS
Posts: 258

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 29
Seems to be that way... Gotta be a reason for FC-15...? Updated software just doesn't cut it I guess, the real thing is eventually this may get pushed into Enterprise Operations...
 
Old 01-26-2011, 02:47 PM   #6
Jeebizz
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Distribution: Slackware 14.1 64-bit with multilib
Posts: 2,075

Rep: Reputation: 210Reputation: 210Reputation: 210
Quote:
Originally Posted by zer0signal View Post
the real thing is eventually this may get pushed into Enterprise Operations...
In that cast I feel very sorry for those who are Administering Fedora/RHEL servers. Reinventing the wheel is not whats needed.
 
Old 01-26-2011, 04:29 PM   #7
John VV
Guru
 
Registered: Aug 2005
Posts: 13,031

Rep: Reputation: 1740Reputation: 1740Reputation: 1740Reputation: 1740Reputation: 1740Reputation: 1740Reputation: 1740Reputation: 1740Reputation: 1740Reputation: 1740Reputation: 1740
Quote:
In that cast I feel very sorry for those who are Administering Fedora/RHEL servers. Reinventing the wheel is not whats needed.
i would never install fedora on a server ( one maybe exception - a for fun home server )

but it will be many many years before this shows up in RHEL , if it ever dose .
 
Old 01-26-2011, 04:35 PM   #8
zer0signal
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2010
Location: Cleveland
Distribution: Slackware, Fedora, RHEL (4,5), LFS 6.7, CentOS
Posts: 258

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 29
Quote:
i would never install fedora on a server ( one maybe exception - a for fun home server )

but it will be many many years before this shows up in RHEL , if it ever dose .
Yeah, I agree on both. Earliest IMO would be RHEL 7, by then who knows what has changed.
 
Old 01-26-2011, 05:51 PM   #9
anomie
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Texas
Distribution: RHEL, Scientific Linux, Debian, Fedora, Lubuntu, FreeBSD
Posts: 3,930
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by zer0signal
Fedora 15 - Changing Eth Device Naming Scheme
This doesn't appear to be going over well - here or on the announcement page you pointed to.

If I could offer a differing opinion: I mostly like the naming scheme idea. It would be useful to me to quickly know from a remote location which physical device a logical name refers to. I manage several servers with three four-port Intel PCIe NICs, and one four-port Broadcom onboard NIC. It's annoying to have to document logical -> physical mappings for eth0 through eth15, just so I can explain to a data center technician which port he can operate on without bringing our apps to a screeching halt.

Anyway, WRT the new Fedora naming scheme proposal, I have a different nit to pick. I don't like that they're using 1-based port numbering. Every *nix I know of uses 0-based.
 
Old 01-26-2011, 06:15 PM   #10
John VV
Guru
 
Registered: Aug 2005
Posts: 13,031

Rep: Reputation: 1740Reputation: 1740Reputation: 1740Reputation: 1740Reputation: 1740Reputation: 1740Reputation: 1740Reputation: 1740Reputation: 1740Reputation: 1740Reputation: 1740
pulse audio also did not go over well back in fedora 8

so who knows , time will tell.
 
Old 01-26-2011, 06:46 PM   #11
wafflesausage
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2010
Distribution: FreeBSD(preferred), Fedora 15, WebOS, Mac OS, NetBSD, Ubuntu (if I have no other choice)
Posts: 46

Rep: Reputation: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by anomie View Post
This doesn't appear to be going over well - here or on the announcement page you pointed to.

If I could offer a differing opinion: I mostly like the naming scheme idea. It would be useful to me to quickly know from a remote location which physical device a logical name refers to. I manage several servers with three four-port Intel PCIe NICs, and one four-port Broadcom onboard NIC. It's annoying to have to document logical -> physical mappings for eth0 through eth15, just so I can explain to a data center technician which port he can operate on without bringing our apps to a screeching halt.

Anyway, WRT the new Fedora naming scheme proposal, I have a different nit to pick. I don't like that they're using 1-based port numbering. Every *nix I know of uses 0-based.
I know, this is just confusing and inconsistent with how all other devices are named. Devices in Unix-like systems have always started at zero and counted up. It doesn't make it more intuitive because new users will question the inconsistency or expect all devices to count up from one, and experienced users are already familiar with counting up from zero.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: Breaking a few eggs: Fedora 15 changes network device naming LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 01-25-2011 11:40 AM
Can Eth device names(or macs) be correlated to the physical eth port? VG1 Linux - Networking 1 12-01-2009 06:13 PM
Resetting eth naming? GSMD Linux - Networking 4 12-14-2007 03:23 PM
Is there a way to have grub translate its own naming to naming scheme under Linux zhjim Linux - Software 6 05-28-2006 08:09 AM
Mandrake adopts new roadmap and naming scheme TravisOSF Linux - News 7 03-28-2005 10:30 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:20 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration