| General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun! |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
|
11-15-2012, 08:06 PM
|
#1
|
|
Guru
Registered: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,534
|
Erase hard drives
I used to joke that a hammer is the best way and have actually done it more than a few times.
I think I have a much better way now. Get one of these. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...-pla-_-NA-_-NA if there is enough ferrous metal in the drive it ought to destroy it.
If you do attempt such a thing, do it in a safe place and away from people and pets and have an extension cord to pull to stop it. It might put out some toxic smoke.
|
|
|
|
11-15-2012, 08:17 PM
|
#2
|
|
LQ Veteran
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Annapolis, MD
Distribution: Arch/XFCE
Posts: 17,797
|
The hammer is cheaper....
Last time I did this "final erase", I removed all the magnets first----they must be good for something......
|
|
|
|
11-15-2012, 09:40 PM
|
#3
|
|
Guru
Registered: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,534
Original Poster
|
I used to LOVE the old big scsi drives. I still have some of the big magnets.
|
|
|
|
11-16-2012, 03:29 AM
|
#4
|
|
Guru
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,607
|
The best way is to do it via sofware, or take the platters out and run a big magnet over them. Then at your choice you can smash them with a sledgehammer.
|
|
|
|
11-18-2012, 03:18 PM
|
#5
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Nov 2012
Posts: 24
Rep: 
|
The worst thing I hate about using software to securely erase hard drives is it takes too long especially when you need to do multiple passes.
This is how I erase/destroy hard drives. I do a dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/sdx on the drive one time. Then I remove the hard drive and disassemble it. I then destroy the pieces and platters as much as I could.
Last edited by penguinator; 11-18-2012 at 03:21 PM.
|
|
|
|
11-19-2012, 07:57 AM
|
#6
|
|
Guru
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,607
|
Using 'wipe' is much faster than /dev/urandom. If you are going to take it apart anyway, there's no need to wipe it with software, instead use a powerful magnet on the platters themselves.
|
|
|
|
11-19-2012, 12:53 PM
|
#7
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Nov 2012
Posts: 24
Rep: 
|
I was thinking of upgrading to SSD drives in the future. Having a hard drive in today's world is like using a record player. it's old technology. However, after looking at these SSD drives, the prices are too high for so little storage.
Sooo, I will be stuck with my so called record player for a while.
Maybe I'll try the magnet trick in the future or add it to my current way of destroying platters i.e drilling holes into the platters 
Last edited by penguinator; 11-19-2012 at 12:56 PM.
|
|
|
|
11-19-2012, 07:11 PM
|
#8
|
|
Guru
Registered: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,534
Original Poster
|
Yep, the ssd's are still high but dropping fast as well as getting bigger and faster so you have to figure that too. They are not immune to needing special erase also. Data can get locked inside them.
|
|
|
|
11-19-2012, 08:22 PM
|
#9
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Nov 2012
Posts: 24
Rep: 
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jefro
Yep, the ssd's are still high
|
I know, SLC SSD drives are almost twice or triple the price of the MLC types with the same amount of storage.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jefro
Data can get locked inside them.
|
Very interesting.
PS: I found this link on youtube. It's a basic overview of SSD drives i.e types, terms, etc.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpVyn2izhRo
Last edited by penguinator; 11-19-2012 at 08:54 PM.
|
|
|
|
11-20-2012, 03:48 AM
|
#10
|
|
Guru
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,607
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jefro
Yep, the ssd's are still high but dropping fast as well as getting bigger and faster so you have to figure that too. They are not immune to needing special erase also. Data can get locked inside them.
|
Yes, they require special methods to erase data ... and who knows how secure they really are. I think this is why they are pushing them and raising the prices of HDDs. [/end of conspiracy theory]
|
|
|
|
11-21-2012, 06:42 AM
|
#11
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: SE Tennessee, USA
Distribution: Gentoo, LFS
Posts: 4,554
|
|
|
|
|
11-23-2012, 02:30 PM
|
#12
|
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2007
Location: 1 AU from a G2V star
Distribution: PCLinuxOS LXDE
Posts: 65
Rep:
|
A BFH should work equally well with SSD's or HDD's if the proper technique is judiciously applied.  Not as eloquent as sundialsvcs's suggestion ( I like how you think...) but you shouldn't need a sunblock with a SPF 37,000,000,000 either.  Perhaps the ABL now that it's not being used...
|
|
|
|
11-23-2012, 03:33 PM
|
#13
|
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2012
Distribution: OpenSuSE,RHEL,OpenBSD
Posts: 496
Rep: 
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by penguinator
dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/sdx
|
If you don't set a large blocksize of course it's slow.
|
|
|
|
11-23-2012, 05:04 PM
|
#14
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Nov 2012
Posts: 24
Rep: 
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by linosaurusroot
If you don't set a large blocksize of course it's slow.
|
Actually, I do -- but I forgot to add it. I use bs=1M. I sometimes use DBan only when I want to wipe it and give the drive to someone else or reuse the drive in the future.
Either way, both take a considerable about of time. Which is why I do this at night and hope it'll be done when I wake up in the morning.
Last edited by penguinator; 11-23-2012 at 05:06 PM.
|
|
|
|
11-24-2012, 04:32 AM
|
#15
|
|
Guru
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,607
|
Again using wipe is much faster than /dev/urandom, and is just as secure.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:13 AM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|