LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 03-30-2011, 09:30 AM   #1
Alexvader
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2009
Location: Japan
Distribution: Arch, Debian, Slackware
Posts: 994

Rep: Reputation: 94
Crux Linux


Hi...

AFAIK the only lightweight Linux distro out there, that retains the K.I.S.S. principle is a rolling release Model, Arch.

Are there any non rolling release Distros similar to Arch in every other aspect...?

Is Crux Linux a rolling release also...?

BRGDS

Alex
 
Old 03-30-2011, 10:16 AM   #2
brianL
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Oldham, Lancs, England
Distribution: Slackware & Slackware64 14.1
Posts: 6,915
Blog Entries: 51

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
S-------e.
 
Old 03-30-2011, 10:23 AM   #3
Alexvader
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2009
Location: Japan
Distribution: Arch, Debian, Slackware
Posts: 994

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 94
Hi

I 1i3k S-----a-- a lot, but it is not as minimalistic as Crux or Arch...
 
Old 03-30-2011, 10:42 AM   #4
brianL
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Oldham, Lancs, England
Distribution: Slackware & Slackware64 14.1
Posts: 6,915
Blog Entries: 51

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
You can make it as minimalist as you want. There has been a few threads in the Slack forum about minimal installs.
 
Old 03-30-2011, 09:51 PM   #5
rob.rice
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Distribution: slack what ever
Posts: 784

Rep: Reputation: 99
how small do you want ?
what do you want to do ?
what will this distro run on ?

more information please
 
Old 03-31-2011, 10:10 AM   #6
Alexvader
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2009
Location: Japan
Distribution: Arch, Debian, Slackware
Posts: 994

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 94
Hi

1). 1 Gig would be enough... but this is not strict limit... some of my apps when installed are about 1 Gig size... i am just refering to the system itself...

2). Number crunching, 3D Graphics design, some web browsing, some youtube, spreadsheet, text processing,

3.) an Intel core i5, 8 Gigs RAM, 500 GB HDD, Nvidia GForce 9600 GT.


I would like the ability to run a single upgrade once a new release of the distro is out, without b0rk1nG my system, so I consider having some builds of packages in a folder at home, ready to be compiled into the new kernel as modules. ( wireless, GPU Driver ) this is why i generally leave /home/* in a separate partition...

Arch is very much what i like, except for a minor detail... not so small... running an upgrade breaks lots of stuff from AUR... AUR in itself is very complete, but it does not have mechanisms to cope with a massive upgrade ( pacman -Syu ) so there i go, buildng lots of stuff...

This is why i do not like Arch rolling release paradigm...

AFAIK Crux is very arch-like, but has no AUR... means that i would have to build all my stuff from source...

Slackware can be very much Arch/Crux like if one goes for a tag-file install...

Last edited by Alexvader; 04-01-2011 at 08:54 AM.
 
Old 03-31-2011, 07:19 PM   #7
trademark91
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Distribution: Slackware -current x64
Posts: 372

Rep: Reputation: 72
slackware im pretty sure can be set up to be as if not more bare bones as any other system.
 
Old 03-31-2011, 09:02 PM   #8
Saptech
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2000
Location: Third Stone from the Sun
Distribution: Sourcemage
Posts: 132

Rep: Reputation: 19
What about Unity Linux, based on Mandriva, is a rolling release. Its default desktop environment is Openbox. It's also available as both a 32-bit and 64-bit Live CD.

It may not be the same as Arch but does looks interesting.

http://unity-linux.org/
 
Old 03-31-2011, 09:28 PM   #9
colorpurple21859
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2008
Location: florida
Distribution: slackware64-current, puppy, ubuntu
Posts: 1,342

Rep: Reputation: 184Reputation: 184
This is what I know about Crux from having it installed at one time.
1. No it's not rolling release, they have release cycles similar to Slackware.
2. Install is minimalistic, during the initial install Xorg is considered optional. After initial installation X only uses TWM window manger. The only other window manager available after the initial install is openbox and have to configure config files by hand to get openbox to work.
3. Crux uses a cross between a package system similar to Slack and a ports system similar to Gentoo to install additional software, but IMHO is not as user friendly.
4. Configuration files are edited by hand to get things to work.

Last edited by colorpurple21859; 03-31-2011 at 09:30 PM.
 
Old 03-31-2011, 09:54 PM   #10
MrCode
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2009
Location: Oregon, USA
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 864
Blog Entries: 31

Rep: Reputation: 147Reputation: 147
Quote:
Originally Posted by trademark91
slackware im pretty sure can be set up to be as if not more bare bones as any other system.
I think the point is that the OP wants a system that *comes* this way, not something where you have to prune your way down to a minimal system, and yes, Arch is definitely one of those kinds of systems.

EDIT:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alexvader
AFAIK Crux is very arch-like, but has no AUR... means that i would have to build all my stuff from source...
Actually, you'd have to compile from source *anyway*. All the AUR does is provide PKGBUILDs and any other pre/post-install scripts/files to build/install the application from source automatically, very similar to *BSD ports.

Last edited by MrCode; 03-31-2011 at 09:58 PM. Reason: Caps Lock correction
 
Old 03-31-2011, 10:10 PM   #11
trademark91
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Distribution: Slackware -current x64
Posts: 372

Rep: Reputation: 72
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrCode View Post
I think the point is that the OP wants a system that *comes* this way, not something where you have to prune your way down to a minimal system, and yes, Arch is definitely one of those kinds of systems.
then i would suggest crunchbang or archbang.
 
Old 04-01-2011, 06:50 AM   #12
Arcane
Member
 
Registered: May 2006
Location: Latvia, Europe
Distribution: random
Posts: 287

Rep: Reputation: 148Reputation: 148
Try Debian it comes close to Arch in minimalism.
 
Old 04-26-2011, 04:31 PM   #13
RedNeck-LQ
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2011
Posts: 83

Rep: Reputation: 11
I've installed crux 2.7 awhile back

I think the 'keep it simple' part in my viewpoint means not building crux from ground up like LFS and Gentoo.

The only thing you need to build is the kernel. After that you install program(s) using crux's ports system.

Last edited by RedNeck-LQ; 04-26-2011 at 04:35 PM.
 
Old 04-27-2011, 01:42 AM   #14
smeezekitty
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: Washington U.S.
Distribution: M$ Windows / Debian / Ubuntu / DSL / many others
Posts: 2,227

Rep: Reputation: 167Reputation: 167
Soon enough, I can beat that: http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...mputer-872662/
Less then 1.5MB in size with only ~6MB of ram required to boot.
 
Old 07-16-2013, 05:32 AM   #15
Siljrath
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: the internet
Distribution: sid, slack, gentoo, witch, bedrock, etc
Posts: 148

Rep: Reputation: 26
update with more such distros.

you may also be interested in dragora. it's of quite similar ilk in many respects.

another that might interest, is hadron.

and i'm not sure if this would interest the op, but may interest others, exherbo, kinda like gentoo, but with paludis.

oh, and how about parabola. if you want something like arch, but not arch, it doesnt get much closer than that, because parabola IS arch, but with all the proprietary stuff taken out.

i'll also add that slackware is perfectly suited to minimal base installs, without having to gut out loads of auto-installed stuff in some bloated core. (without any significant effort, i had my nice minimal desktop slack installed on a 1.337gb partition with room to spare... though, not enough room for compiling new stuff, that i did elsewhere. ^_^ i think it was maybe even <700mb on the hd... damn, coulda put that on a cd without compression nicely.)

... i keep thinking i am neglecting to mention an important other one here too... :$ [edit: i'm on crux at the mo... maybe that was the one i was thinking of]

(found this thread searching for whether crux could be run as a rolling release... i hope this isnt considered some thread-necro offense. ... we can always do with more updates of this sort of info methinks. ~ scary warnings in red letters above the reply box, eep! this is timely and relevant for this, right?)

Last edited by Siljrath; 07-16-2013 at 05:42 AM.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Has anybody around tried Crux Linux ? Alexvader General 10 05-31-2010 07:14 AM
Can't remote ssh into a CRUX linux machine emeak Linux - Newbie 2 08-10-2009 11:12 PM
Linux (CRUX 2.1) won't recognize/load my Network device on eth0 Mr. Asdf Linux - Networking 1 07-14-2005 08:16 AM
Crux Linux - trouble booting after first install John5788 Linux - Distributions 1 02-10-2004 01:52 AM
Crux Linux BittaBrotha Linux - Distributions 3 04-02-2003 12:44 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:52 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration