LinuxQuestions.org
Go Job Hunting at the LQ Job Marketplace
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices

View Poll Results: Consider this as a poll and vote with sincerity;
Yes: We achieved our goal and itís time to leave 2 11.11%
Yes: We failed to achieve our goal and itís time to leave 9 50.00%
No: We need to stay till Iraqiís take responsibility 5 27.78%
No: We need to stay till we achieve all of our goals in the region 2 11.11%
Voters: 18. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Search this Thread
Old 05-18-2006, 05:33 PM   #1
warpeace2006
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Be honest with yourself


I registered with a new nick-name for not influencing your choice, and to be free in your decision
--------



After three years in Iraq.
After thousands of dead and injured soldiers; and still counting.
After billions of dollars spent, not on rebuilding Iraq, but on the war itself; and still counting.



One would pause for a minute and ask oneself with complete honesty;
Shall we get out of Iraq?



Consider this as a poll and vote with sincerity;
Shall we get out of Iraq?
 
Old 05-18-2006, 06:51 PM   #2
cs-cam
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Australia
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 3,544
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 56
Quote:
I registered with a new nick-name for not influencing your choice, and to be free in your decision
So you've been a member here before and yet you still can't figure out a) the correct forum to post in and b) that a thread like this will probably end up closed and c) it's against the rules to have multiple nicks.

TigerLinux, is that you...?
 
Old 05-18-2006, 06:53 PM   #3
rshaw
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2001
Location: Perry, Iowa
Distribution: Mepis , Debian
Posts: 2,694

Rep: Reputation: 45
yay. moving to general
 
Old 05-18-2006, 09:31 PM   #4
laceupboots
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: Houston
Distribution: Windows Vista/ XP/ Mepis
Posts: 304

Rep: Reputation: 30
I think that we have overstayed our welcome in Iraq and it's time to bring them home. Peace has it's own challenges and we should get started on them.
 
Old 05-19-2006, 02:19 AM   #5
aizkorri
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: Basque Country
Distribution: Fedora 14, Ubuntu 11.10
Posts: 425
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 36
maybe the question should be,
which was the goal?

Last edited by aizkorri; 05-19-2006 at 02:21 AM.
 
Old 05-19-2006, 04:18 AM   #6
Crito
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Knoxville, TN
Distribution: Kubuntu 9.04
Posts: 1,168

Rep: Reputation: 53
We replaced a largely secular government with one run by religious zealots. And to top it off that's exactly what everyone said would happen if we created a power vacuum in the region. It's like self-fulfilling prophecy or something. Doesn't matter if you rub the Jesus freaks' noses in it, they're going to keep on listening and obeying till the day Armageddon comes. Even if they have to create Armageddon themselves, that is.

I'd have to vote for none of the above. The world is considerably worse off when more religious fanatics are in power, regardless of which country we're talking about. So I'd say we've failed, can't leave now (might as well just give Iran the whole country) and we'll likely never achieve our goals in the region. It's the lose-lose quagmire everyone predicted.
 
Old 05-19-2006, 06:44 AM   #7
vivek reddy
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Bangalore, India
Distribution: RHEL-4, fedora core 3, SLES-9,ubuntu 5.1
Posts: 22

Rep: Reputation: 15
the whole world thinks your target was OIL . if thats the case you have not achieved your goal. otherwise its time to leave.
 
Old 05-19-2006, 09:09 AM   #8
dukeinlondon
Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: London
Distribution: kubuntu 8.10
Posts: 593
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 30
You can't leave now unless there is strong evidence that it would ease the terror that goes on there. Americans voted twice for Bush now they can't just get away from the consequences.
 
Old 05-19-2006, 09:10 AM   #9
truthfatal
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Distribution: Slackware, OS X
Posts: 443
Blog Entries: 9

Rep: Reputation: 32
IBTL

Should never have went there in the first place.

It seems to me like a 'Damned if your do, Damned if you don't' kind of situation.
 
Old 05-19-2006, 09:18 AM   #10
nonades
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: VTC, VT
Distribution: Fedora 11
Posts: 46

Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by vivek reddy
the whole world thinks your target was OIL . if thats the case you have not achieved your goal. otherwise its time to leave.


R - O - F - L
 
Old 05-21-2006, 12:11 AM   #11
primo
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2005
Posts: 542

Rep: Reputation: 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crito
We replaced a largely secular government with one run by religious zealots. And to top it off that's exactly what everyone said would happen if we created a power vacuum in the region.
The house of cards collapsed. I find it dumb that G. Bush Jr. is fueling the war with a "total victory" speech and we don't know what it means to him. From family pride to oil, it's a shame. What do americans expect from it ? This is for real. It's not a movie. I do believe that in the federal govt there's a bunch of christian extremists wanting to bring the Armageddon. Call it "Free doom, final part", if you like.
 
Old 05-21-2006, 12:42 AM   #12
ehawk
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,257

Rep: Reputation: 48
As we created this situation, we are ethically and morally obligated to work toward a situation which will be better than what it replaced. Throughout the process, we must ask ourselves:

1) If we leave at this point, will the situation be better than what we observed at the time of our intervention?

2) At this point, does it seem reasonable to expect that our continued efforts can improve the situation?

If things are worse, and we believe continued effort will improve the situation, we are obligated to try.

If at some point 1) can be answered in the affirmative, we can bring our intervention to a close. If 1) can't be achieved, and 2) is answered in the negative, we failed, we caused harm, but we can justify departure.

As most people seem to think things are worse for the people there now, I guess the crux of the question is 2). It could be asked whether our continued intervention is in our (US) interest. I think most people would respond in the negative. I suppose I am restating the essence of the poll options.
 
Old 05-21-2006, 10:12 AM   #13
peter_89
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Distribution: Microsoft Windows XP Professional SP2; Slackware Linux 10.2
Posts: 215

Rep: Reputation: 30
I must ask all of you, why is it so obvious to some that Bush is a lying war pig, and yet Saddam Hussein never could have lied about such a thing as WMD's? This man was a murderer and wouldn't have hesitated for a second to blow the world to bits. Documents show him to be mentally unstable. With all of the other countries against us, you think it would have been good to have another one? Another one, not only threatening us, but Europe and the rest of the world? If he didn't have WMD's when we searched for them, what makes you people think there's no way he wouldn't have gotten them in the future? What makes him any more trustworthy than somebody like Kaczynski or Bin Laden?
 
Old 05-21-2006, 11:43 AM   #14
odiseo77
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: London, UK
Distribution: Debian Sid, OpenSUSE 13.1
Posts: 934

Rep: Reputation: 245Reputation: 245Reputation: 245
The poll is strongly biased. There should be options like:
'We should have never invade Iraq'
'We have not achieved any goals because there were not such goals (other than stealing oil)'
'We should leave right now'
 
Old 05-21-2006, 12:02 PM   #15
XavierP
Moderator
 
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Kent, England
Distribution: Lubuntu
Posts: 19,165
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 426Reputation: 426Reputation: 426Reputation: 426Reputation: 426
These don't end well. And it's politics. So I've closed it. These arguments, and many others, can be found elsewhere on the internet.
 
  


Closed Thread


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
An Honest Report on my Linux Adventure lukeprog Linux - General 23 02-08-2006 12:36 PM
honest... true (and funny) story tw001_tw General 4 09-23-2005 09:54 AM
Honest IT tech support tireseas General 1 05-31-2005 07:06 AM
Need An Honest Answer Comatose51 Linux - General 3 05-28-2005 02:50 AM
Honest Window Manager Discussion rcbarnes Linux - Newbie 18 11-10-2004 03:44 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:59 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration