Bad, Bad, BAD! (Firefox is basically ditching html5 video support)
GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
Why is this bad? Firefox can't use h.264 because of licensing issues, so they really can't do anything about it. That's why they're focusing on Ogg/Theora. If Google comes through and opens up VP8, they can support that.
And all Google has to do is move YouTube to VP8. I'm sure they're looking at doing that, and once it happens, h.264 is likely going to be an also-ran. Unless Jobs follows through on his FUD about infringements on h.264 patents in which case we all get to watch the lawyers get richer. Again.
I've already had a good rant relating to this here.
For some reason Mozilla chose to include their own codec rather than supporting OS codecs through gstreamer, directshow, etc. This means you can't even license your own H.264 codec for personal use (or use the one included Windows and OSX) and use it with Firefox. I don't know if there's a plan to support OS codecs nor why it was decided not to.
That pretty much says it all...it means that you couldn't use H.264 (or any other codec for that matter) with FF, because there simply would be no support at all.
I agree that this whole H.264 patent business is getting way out of hand.