LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices



Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 04-10-2009, 10:59 PM   #1
GrapefruiTgirl
Guru
 
Registered: Dec 2006
Location: underground
Distribution: Slackware64
Posts: 7,594

Rep: Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550
Question Any RC Helicopter enthusiasts around here? Seeking opinion on a few models.


I would appreciate some critique, based on hands-on knowledge & experience if at all possible, of the following electric RC Helicopters. I am considering acquiring one of the following or a similar model in the near future.
Alternately, recommendations on another comparable model would be well received, keeping in mind that relative cost is a factor, but durability, good engineering, & parts quality are very important (no junk!). Also, I'm not looking at any gas-powered models at this time.

Features I (pretty much) definitely want (may edit later):
1 - Collective Pitch main rotor.
2 - Able to replace/upgrade parts (electronics, motors, rotors)
3 - Do-it-myself assembly would be nice.

Things I am unsure about (pros/cons):
1 - direct-drive electric tail rotor vs. belt/shaft-driven tail rotor?
2 - Radio system: 2.4GHz vs. 72MHz?


Here's what I am looking at now:
1 - Heli-Max AXE CPv3 Micro
2 - E-Flite Blade CP+
3 - E-Flite Blade CP Pro-2
4 - Align T-Rex 250

Thanks for your feedback
Sasha
 
Old 04-11-2009, 06:32 AM   #2
H_TeXMeX_H
Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,928
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269
I recommend you get a Kyosho or Align one, they seem better quality, but probably the others are ok too.

If you've never flown one before, I recommend you get a cheap one, because it will likely be destroyed. They're also quite difficult to tune or calibrate. You may need help from an expert with this. I had a gas powered one, and it was nearly impossible to calibrate without expert help. If it's not calibrated right, it won't fly at all well and likely crash and break. They're usually tough enough to last through many crashes, but eventually they do break. Not to mention that it's not trivial to fly a helicopter, even a mini one.

If you want an easier one to fly try one with a contra-rotating coaxial main rotor and no tail rotor:
http://www.rchelicopter.com/2007/09/...copter-basics/
http://www.google.com/products?q=RC+...rotating&hl=en
they're much easier to calibrate too.
 
Old 04-11-2009, 10:01 AM   #3
GrapefruiTgirl
Guru
 
Registered: Dec 2006
Location: underground
Distribution: Slackware64
Posts: 7,594

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550
Hi Tex-meX,

Thanks for those tips!

I already have one heli, but it is a VERY basic, fixed-pitch, cheap beginner model, and as such, it is virtually impossible to fly in any sort of controlled manner :/
I am not interested in one of the CX units (with the counter-rotating blades) as it is not the 'real' thing IMHO and over-simplifies the whole point/experience of having a heli. I'm pretty mechanically inclined and reasonably coordinated, so I anticipate a learning curve I can live with.
I have done loads of Googling, joined an RC heli forum, and downloaded/read tutorials and primers on learning to fly.

I will have a look at some of the Kyosho ones as you have suggested though, and see what they have to offer. Most likely, due to my price range, I will be buying a pre-assembled unit as opposed to a nicer do-it-yourself kit version; the pre-assembled ones are flown at the factory and for the most part are calibrated decently.

Thanks!
Sasha
 
Old 04-11-2009, 10:10 AM   #4
H_TeXMeX_H
Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,928
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269
Yeah, you're right, I did assemble mine from parts, it wasn't too hard, but it was not at all calibrated and stuff. I had to find an expert to help me.

I wouldn't call CX helicopters not the "real" thing:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ka-50
 
Old 04-11-2009, 12:39 PM   #5
jiml8
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,171

Rep: Reputation: 115Reputation: 115
You'll find a direct drive tail rotor to be more reliable. Belts and shafts both have their problems and won't even be lighter given modern coreless electric motors. Playing with a helicopter that doesn't have a fully collective head is a waste of time.

I personally am a contest director in the Academy of Model Aeronautics (which I have belonged to for 39 years) and have not done much in that time with helicopters. However, I have been giving it some thought over the last couple of years, particularly with electric powered helicopters.

I have known helicopter fliers literally since the first days of model helicopters, though, and I have observed a lot of the things they have done. One trick that hasn't gone out of style is to attach a couple of arrow shafts crosswise to the landing skids (so that they stick out on the sides) and attache tennis balls to both ends of both shafts. This will give you a very wide stance "training gear" that will make it much harder to tip the helicopter over and bash the rotor on the ground. You get a lot more practice time in, with much less damage and repair to the helicopter as a result.

You might also want to give serious thought to purchasing a flight simulator that will accept your transmitter as its control input. They exist, and they'll go a long way toward training you to fly the heli without destroying your expensive model.
 
Old 04-11-2009, 01:20 PM   #6
brianL
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Oldham, Lancs, England
Distribution: Slackware & Slackware64 14.1
Posts: 7,135
Blog Entries: 52

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
RC helicopters? The Pope flies one.
 
Old 04-11-2009, 03:02 PM   #7
GrapefruiTgirl
Guru
 
Registered: Dec 2006
Location: underground
Distribution: Slackware64
Posts: 7,594

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550
Thanks for the continued input you guys,

@ TexMex - Cool! I didn't realize there were (so many) CX helis in real life, and Russian too but still, for my purposes, I don't want a CX model; I still think while it's a neat innovation in the real-heli world, it detracts from the skill and functionality of the RC helis. I really want a single-rotor one.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jiml8 View Post
You'll find a direct drive tail rotor to be more reliable. Belts and shafts both have their problems and won't even be lighter given modern coreless electric motors.
'Coreless motors'?? Is this anything like 'brushless' or 'magnetic-drive' motors? I haven't done any searching as of this writing, but I've been dealing with electronics and stuff much of my life, and never heard of a coreless motor (unless this is a different name for something else). I'll hafta look around on that one.
But what I specifically wonder about is the controllability and/or responsiveness of the direct-drive vs the indirect drive, whereas the direct drive models deal with rudder-control via tail-motor-speed (AFAIK), while the belt/shaft models use adjusting pitch of the tail blades.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jiml8
Playing with a helicopter that doesn't have a fully collective head is a waste of time.
Totally! I can't even keep my current FP heli going in an UNcontrolled circle, let alone any sort of controlled path :/ as the electronics are just too primitive and the FP rotor doesn't allow a decent hover at a fixed altitude unless the batteries are just the perfect amount of dead.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jiml8
I... One trick that hasn't gone out of style is to attach a couple of arrow shafts crosswise to the landing skids (so that they stick out on the sides) and attache tennis balls to both ends of both shafts. This will give you a very wide stance "training gear"...
In fact, this quad-pod training arrangement is available from the heli suppliers too, and is included with some of the models I am looking at. If it isn't included when I buy mine, I will rig up something myself as you describe, with outriggers and foam balls or whatever.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jiml8
You might also want to give serious thought to purchasing a flight simulator that will accept your transmitter as its control input. They exist, and they'll go a long way toward training you to fly the heli without destroying your expensive model.
Yes, they DO exist; I am downloading one as we speak (not one that likely will interface with any controller I get, but who knows) and some of the controllers actually ship with the sim software too, and a USB cable to connect the controller. Again, probably the ones I can afford will NOT include this stuff, and also, I'd bet dollars to doughnuts that the included software is all Windowz stuff, so I wouldn't be able (or willing) to use it anyhow..

I am looking further into RC sim software for Linux, and it actually IS out there. Pretty cool.
As an aside, I just this morning finished building 'FlightGear 1.9.1' on my Slackware system, and even though I HATE trying to play such things with a keyboard, it is pretty awesome!! Excellent program, and it includes helis and even one RC heli
My roommate wanted a flight sim program before I wanted a new RC heli, so we may hafta get a fancy joystick or aircraft controller of some sort in the future, to use FlightGear properly.

Thanks again,
Sasha
 
Old 04-11-2009, 08:22 PM   #8
jiml8
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,171

Rep: Reputation: 115Reputation: 115
coreless motors: http://www.solarbotics.net/starting/..._dcmotor2.html

I suppose a direct drive tail rotor could adjust by adjusting motor speed, but I think it would be more efficient to keep it at a constant speed and just adjust the pitch, exactly as if it was a shaft-driven rotor. Given the mass of the rotor blades, I would think that changing speed (especially accelerating it) would lead to noticeable lags in performance, as well as large current transients on that motor.
 
Old 04-13-2009, 05:14 PM   #9
Flick
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Apr 2009
Posts: 0

Rep: Reputation: 0
Hello,

I was searching for RC Heli Linux Simulators when I saw your question on this forum. I'm new to Linux, so I signed up to the forum and to help you out because I am completely nuts about rc helicopters!

Anyways, I started on a Fixed Pitch Helicopter when I started. The pros: Cheap, easy to repair, cheap, crash well !!!

Collective Pitch Helicopters are the way to go. The head setup is a bit more complex, but they are more stable and the bigger the helicopter the more stable it is. I wouldn't mess around with the smaller CP's that are pretty much a Fixed Pitch Heli with a Collective Pitch head on it. They will not fly the same and they are a handful to learn how to fly on. I would recommend whatever you can afford in the 450 class size of electric helis. Don't worry about tons of upgrades right away because you will crash a lot and it is cheaper to replace stock parts then the fancy ones. I suggest training gear, taking it slow, and flying in big spaces. Also a simulator helps out a lot, but there is nothing like stick time. Like I said I started on a fixed pitch heli in the winter in my living room. Stupid idea. I crashed all the time and got really frustrated. I stuck at it and man I love this hobby. When you fly in a big space like outside you have time to correct yourself and figure the thing out before it hits a wall or something.

It is also a good idea to make sure you have a place to get parts for your heli. Don't buy something that will take weeks for parts to get to you. That's just no fun at all!

If you need an exact model to be recommended then I would say the E-Flite Blade 400. It comes with all you need to get going. Even a 2.4 ghz spectrum radio system. This is a model you can learn on and keep the radio equipment for other models. It also has upgrades and such for when you want to tinker with it.

Sorry for the long post. I hope this helps. Fly as much as you can!
 
Old 04-16-2009, 08:25 AM   #10
ELBRUJO1
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Apr 2009
Posts: 0

Rep: Reputation: 0
Talking RC Heli Beginner

I just saw your post and maybe this will help. 2 months ago I decided to get in RC Helicopters & decided to go electric. I went into my local hobby store and after looking for some time ended up buying an electric plane, an rc heli "Helimax Axe CPV3" and a flight sim "Realflight G4.5".

To make this short and sweet I used the Sim for 2 days and then went outside with the CPV3 and was able to hoover, do some piros and some slow forward flight. BUT LEARN FROM MY MISTAKE!!!!! This heli is not good. The old saying is true the more you spend the better the machine. In the past 2 months I have purchased 10 other Helis including

1. Two TREX 250'S
2. TREX 600ESP
3. POSEIDON GAZAUR
4. GAUI 200

AND MANY OTHERS, the TREX 250'S when setup are awesome, the tail stays exactly where you want unlike the axecpv3 where you are constantly flying the tale (which in a way taught me to fly a bit better) The trex600esp I bought the top of the line stuff and it flys incredibly( gy611 gyro is great)

To sum it up purchase a really good SIM and you will save yourself hundreds of dollars, I must have crashed 30 or more times on the SIM and if that was the real heli besides the money I would have to spend the time fixing and rebuilding constantly. Buy a good Heli and you will stay in this hobby alot longer and not get discouraged. KEN
 
Old 04-21-2009, 02:14 AM   #11
GrapefruiTgirl
Guru
 
Registered: Dec 2006
Location: underground
Distribution: Slackware64
Posts: 7,594

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550
Awesome, thanks very much you guys: EJBRUJO and Flick I will consider what you both have said when I go to do my shopping, and let you guys know what I get, though it will be a *little* bit yet as there are other financial considerations ongoing (working on the house for eg.)

Cheers

Sasha
 
Old 12-06-2010, 01:56 PM   #12
rob.rice
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Distribution: slack what ever
Posts: 795

Rep: Reputation: 119Reputation: 119
yes I am well aware this is an old dead thread BUT what I have found I think justifies my posting
so what have I found
a rc helicopter flight simulator at
http://crrcsim.berlios.de/wiki/index...RCsim.HomePage
it is primarily a rc glider simulator with a rc helicopter option
the web page says it works with transmitter interface cables as well as the 2 joystick e sky FMS controller
 
  


Reply

Tags
rc


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: Opinion: The Best Open Source Business Models LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 09-11-2007 12:11 AM
LXer: Helicopter Simulator: Really Real-time Linux LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 09-20-2006 03:54 AM
Seeking opinion on AMD CPU satimis Linux - Hardware 2 08-15-2006 06:05 PM
seeking opinion from experienced ones santasballz Linux - Newbie 9 03-03-2004 08:05 PM
hello linux enthusiasts sirjosi LinuxQuestions.org Member Intro 1 10-22-2003 03:49 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:52 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration