GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Heh, apple releases ALAC under the Apache license. I could make a few comments about that.....But I'll just leave it as 'if apple likes open source so much, why dont they add .flac support to itunes , ipods, etc'?
Even if it was using a GPL licence, I would still use .flac over ALAC. Apart from everything else, flac has that great internal checksum, ALAC doesnt.
Overall flac is better and has a better license, so there is no real reason to use alac over flac. Still, more open source software is better, and is extremely rare from Apple.
I was excited but I have found that the files produced by alacconvert are unplayable with the svn MPlayer, and this has no trouble with the caf files found here:
That's the first good news I've heard from Apple in a long time.
The funny thing is that, given the last few years of Mac hardware, there are a lot of folks who are leaving the Mac. Making ALAC FOSS just makes it serve as a bridge between Mac OS X and Linux. This way, you get a lossless format that you can use on anything. FLAC is nice, but Apple’s music players can’t play FLAC files. A universal lossless codec like ALAC is that it makes the Mac to Linux transition easier. If you re-ripped all of your CDs in ALAC (I did) when ALAC was released (or sometime after), your music collection is ready for your move to Linux. Then your files will already be in a Linux-supported and free/open source codec.
And yeah, I realize this thread is from 2011. Well, this is kind of an update. The Mac hardware in 2011 was great, but it’s been deteriorating over the years. Now, for the most part, new Macs can’t be upgraded, repaired or expanded. And last year, they took away all useful I/O from the 12” MacBook and the MacBook Pros.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.