LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 10-27-2011, 08:18 PM   #1
lupusarcanus
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 1,022
Blog Entries: 19

Rep: Reputation: 146Reputation: 146
ALAC is now FOSS


http://www.macrumors.com/2011/10/27/...w-open-source/

Good job Apple. Doesn't make much of a difference though.
 
Old 10-28-2011, 01:12 AM   #2
sag47
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: Raleigh, NC
Distribution: Ubuntu, PopOS, Raspbian
Posts: 1,899
Blog Entries: 36

Rep: Reputation: 477Reputation: 477Reputation: 477Reputation: 477Reputation: 477
Cool. Hopefully Avidemux and Audacity include support for it .
 
Old 10-28-2011, 04:53 AM   #3
H_TeXMeX_H
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,928
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301
That's the first good news I've heard from Apple in a long time.
 
Old 10-28-2011, 05:10 AM   #4
cascade9
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2011
Location: Brisneyland
Distribution: Debian, aptosid
Posts: 3,753

Rep: Reputation: 935Reputation: 935Reputation: 935Reputation: 935Reputation: 935Reputation: 935Reputation: 935Reputation: 935
Heh, apple releases ALAC under the Apache license. I could make a few comments about that.....But I'll just leave it as 'if apple likes open source so much, why dont they add .flac support to itunes , ipods, etc'?

Even if it was using a GPL licence, I would still use .flac over ALAC. Apart from everything else, flac has that great internal checksum, ALAC doesnt.
 
Old 10-28-2011, 01:19 PM   #5
H_TeXMeX_H
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,928
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301
Overall flac is better and has a better license, so there is no real reason to use alac over flac. Still, more open source software is better, and is extremely rare from Apple.
 
Old 10-28-2011, 05:16 PM   #6
lupusarcanus
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 1,022

Original Poster
Blog Entries: 19

Rep: Reputation: 146Reputation: 146
FLAC > ALAC. But for people with iPods/iPhones (like me), this is a nice, though small, development.
 
Old 10-29-2011, 12:51 AM   #7
andrew.46
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2007
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,365

Rep: Reputation: 493Reputation: 493Reputation: 493Reputation: 493Reputation: 493
I was excited but I have found that the files produced by alacconvert are unplayable with the svn MPlayer, and this has no trouble with the caf files found here:

http://samples.mplayerhq.hu/A-codecs/caf/

For those keen to try the source for alacconvert is here:

Code:
svn checkout http://svn.macosforge.org/repository/alac/trunk ALAC
You may need to adjust the makefile to successfully compile though, the following has been suggested:

Code:
sed -i_bak 's/$(CC) $(LFLAGS) $(OBJS) -o alacconvert/$(CC) $(OBJS) -o alacconvert $(LFLAGS)/' makefile
from within /convert-utility.
 
Old 03-21-2017, 08:24 AM   #8
Mr. Macintosh
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2015
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 297

Rep: Reputation: 60
Quote:
Originally Posted by H_TeXMeX_H View Post
That's the first good news I've heard from Apple in a long time.
The funny thing is that, given the last few years of Mac hardware, there are a lot of folks who are leaving the Mac. Making ALAC FOSS just makes it serve as a bridge between Mac OS X and Linux. This way, you get a lossless format that you can use on anything. FLAC is nice, but Apple’s music players can’t play FLAC files. A universal lossless codec like ALAC is that it makes the Mac to Linux transition easier. If you re-ripped all of your CDs in ALAC (I did) when ALAC was released (or sometime after), your music collection is ready for your move to Linux. Then your files will already be in a Linux-supported and free/open source codec.


And yeah, I realize this thread is from 2011. Well, this is kind of an update. The Mac hardware in 2011 was great, but it’s been deteriorating over the years. Now, for the most part, new Macs can’t be upgraded, repaired or expanded. And last year, they took away all useful I/O from the 12” MacBook and the MacBook Pros.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: The Problem with FOSS Software on an FOSS Operating System LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 02-23-2010 09:10 AM
LXer: Most FOSS users don't contribute to FOSS? No problem! LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 12-12-2009 04:51 AM
What you do for FOSS? w1k0 Linux - General 5 09-13-2009 05:38 PM
ALAC & Lame Script Soulful93 Programming 6 04-15-2009 07:24 PM
FOSS Users kesara Linux User Groups (LUG) 2 12-31-2004 11:11 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:30 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration