LinuxQuestions.org
Visit the LQ Articles and Editorials section
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 05-07-2009, 11:45 AM   #1
Jeebizz
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Distribution: Slackware 14.1 64-bit with multilib
Posts: 2,074

Rep: Reputation: 193Reputation: 193
3D Realms goes under.


I was never much for pc gaming these days, like I was a decade ago, but this is kinda sad. I remember playing the original Duke Nukem, and have fond memories of the original Wolfenstein. I can't believe they were working on the 'latest' Nukem game for 12 YEARS though!

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8037688.stm
 
Old 05-07-2009, 01:27 PM   #2
SlowCoder
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Southeast, U.S.A.
Distribution: Fedora (Desktop), CentOS (Server), Knoppix (Diags)
Posts: 934

Rep: Reputation: 38
Ditto on that! I loved the old games of yore. I have most of the original Apogee and 3DRealms games in my archives ... somewhere ...

Sad to see them go, but that's the way business runs, and they were apparently falling behind.

Last edited by SlowCoder; 05-07-2009 at 01:29 PM.
 
Old 05-07-2009, 02:53 PM   #3
b0uncer
Guru
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Distribution: CentOS, OS X
Posts: 5,131

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
I wondered too where the "latest/greatest" DukeNukem went, always hearing that it's "in development" but never arrived at stores.. The older DNs, up to and including 3D, were sort of fun to play back then---but I really don't wonder this. Every series is bound to fail at some point, and if three successful pieces are made, it's more than better; they should simply have stopped at the DukeNukem 3D and either have gone on a vacation or started doing something completely different.

It reminds me of the Doom case: the original video games (I and II) were good in their ways, but anything that was made after them..not so. And then they did the Trash Trick, turned the downhill garbage into a movie, which was like wrapping the whole thing into a coffin and burying more than six feet under. Only DukeNukem didn't even get to the movie stage (and I hope it never will).
 
Old 05-07-2009, 05:58 PM   #4
PatrickMay16
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: London, England.
Distribution: Ubuntu 7.04 "Feisty Fawn"
Posts: 55

Rep: Reputation: 16
It's kind of sad. It was always fun to hear the latest news on the development of Duke Nukem Forever. I guess now it's over for certain.
 
Old 05-07-2009, 09:34 PM   #5
lumak
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2008
Location: Phoenix
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 799
Blog Entries: 32

Rep: Reputation: 109Reputation: 109
They got the joke wrong at the end... It's "Duke Nukem Fornever" Either way, I thought it was a joke when they started releasing the screen shots.
 
Old 05-07-2009, 11:18 PM   #6
ProtoformX
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Canada
Distribution: LFS SVN
Posts: 334

Rep: Reputation: 33
iD software and Epic Games are the only ones left now, I think the gaming on the PC took a serious blow, I have a feeling that with the demise of 3DR commercial gaming will slowly die off and the only thing left will be graphic demos (the older skool ASM ones) and open source games... tis a sad day to be a PC gamer.
 
Old 05-10-2009, 05:48 AM   #7
Mega Man X
Guru
 
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: ~
Distribution: Ubuntu, FreeBSD, Solaris, DSL
Posts: 5,339

Rep: Reputation: 63
Well, it was about time they went down. 3D Realms was a joke as a developer. As a producer they were ok. They did make the good old Duke Nukem 3D, but that is pretty much it. All they've done on the past years was to keep on releasing screenshots and whatnot of their vaporware Duke Nukem Forever.

That is just one of their mistakes. Other include not releasing console games as much as they should. Taking the "not releasing anything for the Wii" approach is a big mistake these days considering who much Wii-consoles exist.

I'd agree though, PC gaming is dying. Which is a good thing if you ask me. Publishers have been pushing the most disgusting copy protections in history. Now it looks like activation for one machine is the "cool" new thing. It means you get a game, activate it on your machine and you can kiss it goodbye. If you upgrade to a new machine, well, poor you, you've got to buy another copy. If you have a laptop to game at the office after the work, sorry, get another copy.

The PC-Gaming industry is failing because the publishers got greedy and kept harassing legal costumers with activation, copy protection and what not. They should have taken a lesson from Demigod. While it is a subpar game in all aspects except perhaps the multiplayer, it was a success despite the amount of pirated copies.

PC also is the second platform most developers consider today. If you look what PC has got for games the past years you will see that they are basically half-arsed ports of consoles games. Years ago, it was the other way around.

For me, it does not matter. I always preferred gaming on consoles anyway...
 
Old 05-17-2009, 07:32 AM   #8
Crito
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Knoxville, TN
Distribution: Kubuntu 9.04
Posts: 1,168

Rep: Reputation: 53
As long as two companies remain it's not a monopoly and capitalists can still claim we live in a free market society.

I'm just glad no one is enforcing antitrust law. The economy might have recovered otherwise. :P
 
Old 05-17-2009, 08:51 AM   #9
Crito
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Knoxville, TN
Distribution: Kubuntu 9.04
Posts: 1,168

Rep: Reputation: 53
And not that it matters much, as the public believes the "if it ain't a monopoly" boolshiat they hear on the propaganda outlets (like CNN and Fox News), but antitrust law applies to corporate oligarchies and cartels too.

Since Wikipedia is a bastion of communist liberal thinking, take it from the conservatives who did zero antitrust enforcement the last 8 years:
http://www.conservapedia.com/Cartel
http://www.conservapedia.com/Oligopoly

Though I think Wikipedia got one thing right, capitalism and communism are flip sides of the same elitist coin.

Quote:
Capitalism as a social system is sometimes described as an oligarchy. Socialists argue that in a capitalist society, power - economic, cultural and political - rests in the hands of the capitalist class. Socialist and communist states have also been seen as oligarchies, being ruled by a class with special privileges, the nomenklatura.
Quoted from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oligarchy

So, which is better, ATI or nVidia? Republicrat or Democan? Coke or Pepsi? Good thing we live in a free country with sooooo many choices. Oh, and don't forget that if you refuse to participate in the conspiracy (by choosing/voting) then you have no right to complain! <insert long rant littered with four letter expletives here>

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H2QL1Sy_9Ag
Duke Nukem Forever!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=peZuXrxGP3M
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
kerberos authentication for multiple realms sakshale Linux - Security 2 11-20-2008 12:02 PM
Hostnames, Domains, Realms, Samba Groups, etc cov Linux - Networking 1 03-13-2008 09:01 PM
Apache and Realms AgentRn007 Linux - Software 0 04-08-2003 02:52 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:40 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration