2000 years of Mathematics disproven by Government!!
GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Distribution: Debian Wheezy, Jessie, Sid/Experimental, playing with LFS.
Posts: 2,900
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by dugan
Because of the Electoral College system, it's very possible for a candidate to win the popular vote but lose the election.
Just so you know.
Actually it happens in more than just the Electoral College system. We have had a similar thing happen here many times.
The news just come to tv here says Obama 54,000,000, Romney 52,000,000 give or take a couple hundred thou. Sorry to tell you all Obama won fairly and squarely but the naysayers will always pick.
As far as I know, the current figures are somewhere around 55.8 million Obama, 54.4 million Rommney.
Quote:
Originally Posted by szboardstretcher
Textbooks and 2000 years of math to be updated soon by the Glorious Government of the Free People.
No textbooks need changing, maths still works just fine. The issue is the electoral collage system.
Even if your 49/51 million result was true or accurate, its not the 1st time a president has won with a minority of votes. Most recently it hapened in 2000, but also in 1888 and 1876. There was also problems in 1796, 1800 and 1824.
Quote:
Originally Posted by k3lt01
Actually it happens in more than just the Electoral College system. We have had a similar thing happen here many times.
The australian preference voting system is completely different to the electoral collage system.
Distribution: Debian Wheezy, Jessie, Sid/Experimental, playing with LFS.
Posts: 2,900
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by cascade9
The australian preference voting system is completely different to the electoral collage system.
I never said they were the same . Our preferential system wasn't even in my thoughts. What I am pointing out is that the popular vote, regardless of the system or country, doesn't always equal winning the top job.
Actually its not 2000 years but 2000-12=1988 years.
In 2000, the AlGore/Lieberman combo won 50.9 million to Bush/Cheney's 50.4 million. But the electoral system, chads, jeb declaring texas for his bro got george and dick the presidency.
(Source = http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/1...n_2087038.html )
It also explains that Romney was leading the popular vote BEFORE the count from the western states kicked in.
Because of the Electoral College system, it's very possible for a candidate to win the popular vote but lose the election.
Just so you know.
Yes, the two systems are completely unrelated ... so why do people vote again ? and why do people encourage voting ? Probably because they are bored. Well, I have better things to do ... like take a nap.
Distribution: Debian Wheezy, Jessie, Sid/Experimental, playing with LFS.
Posts: 2,900
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by H_TeXMeX_H
Yes, the two systems are completely unrelated ... so why do people vote again ? and why do people encourage voting ? Probably because they are bored. Well, I have better things to do ... like take a nap.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.