LinuxQuestions.org
Support LQ: Use code LQ3 and save $3 on Domain Registration
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Fedora > Fedora - Installation
User Name
Password
Fedora - Installation This forum is for the discussion of installation issues with Fedora.

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Search this Thread
Old 12-24-2004, 01:21 AM   #1
kentarwen
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Posts: 7

Rep: Reputation: 0
File partitions - best practice?


What is the best practice in creating file partitions? For example, i created
(i) / (256MB, primary)
(ii) /boot (256 MB, primary)
(iii) swap (512MB, primary)
(iv) /home (3GB, extended)
(v) /var (3GB, extended)
(vi) /tmp (2GB, extended)
(v) /usr (all the remaining storage on a 30GB hard disk)

I'm using dual-boot: FC 2 & WinXP. WinXP is on the SATA drive and FC2 on the 1st IDE primary, with 512MB RAM.
 
Old 01-04-2005, 06:24 PM   #2
mjmwired
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Distribution: CentOS6, CentOS5, F16, F15, Ubuntu, OpenSuse
Posts: 620

Rep: Reputation: 39
Well just to point out some possible problems in that.

- Your /boot will probably never use up 256MB. Also many modern computers with modern boot loaders no longer need separate boot partitions, they can boot properly on large partitions or even extended partitions.
- You are more likely going to save more data in /home than /usr.
- Restricting swap to the same size as memory has some limitation (for example you won't be able to Suspend-to-Disk ie. "Hibernate").

Basically you can get by with 3 partitions.
Root "/" should be about 6-10GB.
Swap 1GB good in your case.
/Home - all remaining space.

Unless you have advanced needs, I'm willing to bet you can get by perfectly with the above having minimal space wasted and no problems with too small partitions.
 
Old 01-05-2005, 05:42 AM   #3
kentarwen
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Posts: 7

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Thanks for the advice and one more question: is there any performance difference if the file system is on the extended partition instead of primary partition?
 
Old 01-05-2005, 06:22 PM   #4
mjmwired
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Distribution: CentOS6, CentOS5, F16, F15, Ubuntu, OpenSuse
Posts: 620

Rep: Reputation: 39
Not that I can see, I've jumped between running linux on primary and extended partitions countless times over the past few years. I haven't noticed any difference.

The only reason I put linux at times on an extended partition is to reserve a primary spot open for another OS that may require one (ie, windows).
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Can't copy a file bigger than 4GB's between partitions GoBillsBN Linux - Software 6 10-31-2005 02:55 AM
creating partitions and file systems on Solaris 8 ashlesha Solaris / OpenSolaris 7 05-26-2005 01:38 AM
reg file tranfers across partitions deep123 Linux - Newbie 3 04-29-2005 01:49 AM
9.2 partitions not added into a 10.1 file system choco66 Mandriva 1 12-10-2004 05:09 PM
Confused about partitions and file structure frankie_DJ Linux - Newbie 2 09-17-2004 06:25 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:48 PM.

Main Menu
 
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration