| Fedora This forum is for the discussion of the Fedora Project. |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
08-02-2005, 12:00 PM
|
#1
|
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2005
Distribution: ubuntu5.04, ubuntu5.10, suse9.3, mandrake10.1, mandriva2006(beta), FC1-4, redhat9.0, debian sarge
Posts: 519
Rep:
|
why after installing updates using up2date
why after i used up2date to install updates for fc4 i now have 3 operatingsystems to choose from there are 2 fedora and ofcours that god awful xp but after the updates theres fc4 2.6.11 and fc4 2.6.12 or something like that. did i make mistake by installing something? i know i installed a kernal cause in up2date that is first choice not sure if bad or good. and as for the fc4 2.6.11 and fc4 2.6.12 is there a way to get rid of fc4 2.6.11 or just not worth it and keep it there or vice versa? as for future updates should i not instal updated kernal or is that a good thing?
Last edited by boxerboy; 08-02-2005 at 12:03 PM.
|
|
|
|
08-02-2005, 12:14 PM
|
#2
|
|
Guru
Registered: Sep 2001
Location: Montreal, Canada
Distribution: Slackware; Debian; Gentoo...
Posts: 2,163
Rep:
|
There is another entry for the new kern el. It's always a good idea to update the kernel, the purpose of the new entry is in case the update failed or there is some troublem with your new kernel. A failing kernel would prevent you to even boot, so you probably want the fail over entry to be in your bootloader. 
|
|
|
|
08-02-2005, 12:56 PM
|
#3
|
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2005
Distribution: ubuntu5.04, ubuntu5.10, suse9.3, mandrake10.1, mandriva2006(beta), FC1-4, redhat9.0, debian sarge
Posts: 519
Original Poster
Rep:
|
thank you i noticed that fc4 2.6.12 is now default. ty for ur fast responce.
|
|
|
|
08-02-2005, 01:17 PM
|
#4
|
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Chicago
Distribution: Fedora Core 4, Suse 9.3
Posts: 186
Rep:
|
Always use the newest kernel and don't remove the kernel which was previously working. Red Hat releases them and sets them to default for a reason. You can look at the kernel change logs to find out what's new and why.
|
|
|
|
08-02-2005, 04:23 PM
|
#5
|
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2005
Distribution: ubuntu5.04, ubuntu5.10, suse9.3, mandrake10.1, mandriva2006(beta), FC1-4, redhat9.0, debian sarge
Posts: 519
Original Poster
Rep:
|
this may sound like a stupid question but how do u check the kernel change logs?
|
|
|
|
08-02-2005, 04:44 PM
|
#6
|
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Chicago
Distribution: Fedora Core 4, Suse 9.3
Posts: 186
Rep:
|
Remeber Google is your friend, this is a good place to get genneral ifo. To find it in google, you can type something like, "kernel 2.6.12-1.1398 for fedora 4", and this site comes right up:
http://fedoranews.org/mediawiki/inde....12-1.1398_FC4
Enjoy.
|
|
|
|
08-02-2005, 05:18 PM
|
#7
|
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2005
Distribution: ubuntu5.04, ubuntu5.10, suse9.3, mandrake10.1, mandriva2006(beta), FC1-4, redhat9.0, debian sarge
Posts: 519
Original Poster
Rep:
|
thank you googles hates me it always brings up nothing i need and copernic is the same way  thank you im off to read
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:19 AM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|