FedoraThis forum is for the discussion of the Fedora Project.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
I have a simple question that is geared toward the experienced Linux user. I am presently a student of a Linux Certification program through the local Community College. I was provided a Fedora Core 2 release to follow class, however; class is following with release 5. One thing I've found is that Fedora Core administration remains highly the same, the applications and capabilities it seems are the major changes.
To the point:
I bought an HP Pavilion a1730n with an AMD64x2 4600+ Processor. I had downloaded and even ordered the 64-bit version of the Fedora Core 6 release (as I said they remained generally the same and thus any version that will recognize my hardware [unlike release 2] will suffice; the more recent the better). The installation went fine, without interruption or error.
The only issue that has arisen is that with my monitor.
It is a ViewSonic VA1930wm.
According the the Best Buy salesman and ViewSonic tech support, this monitor is suitable for 64-bit OS, but after installation of any 64-bit operating system I am recieving 'out of range' messages.
I speculate that it is because Linux may have confused the drivers with another monitor, ViewSonic or otherwise.
Well, my frustration with Linux built and I deduced to returning to Windows Vista, the good thing is that once again I am able to install the driver for the monitor.
I'm wondering if the experienced Linux user thinks this will make a difference? Installing Linux again and having an out of range error message is not something I look forward to, its more time consuming (and energy consuming) than I would like, so I'm hoping someone may be able to give me a thorough, yet simple solution to my issue, lest I be forced to deal with ViewSonic and their endless questions and suggestions. (We all know the feeling of endless tech support chitter chatter).
In case it is of importance, I have dismissed it thus far because I don't see using a 64-bit incapable video card driver with a 64-bit capable system, but I'm using an nVidia GeForce 6150 LE video card w/o independant ROM. I didn't see it present on the Linux HCL on the forum. Hopefully this is not the issue, but I wouldn't be surprised.
Then again, a video card can be cheaper than a monitor!
I hope I've provided the necessary information; again I wish to install the Fedora Core 6 x86_64 or 64-bit version. Niether is working, both are giving the out of range signal.
Last edited by iconicmoronic; 03-23-2007 at 03:37 AM.
the issue is resolved. you're right, it is that the linux x system is unable to recognize the monitor but being as new to linux as i am i thought it was that the 64 bit OS was just too strong for the monitor. now i'm running side byside with vista so the driver is installed and i got it up and running with no problem, except that when it starts up i go straight to text mode, which is fine. but in order to start the gui i have to do rm /tmp/x0-lock, and them startx because startx says a fatal error has occurred the server is running, etc.