LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Fedora
User Name
Password
Fedora This forum is for the discussion of the Fedora Project.

Notices

View Poll Results: Thinclient or NFS?
Thinclient 0 0%
NFS 3 100.00%
Voters: 3. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 12-01-2006, 02:38 PM   #1
livewire98801
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Distribution: Fedora 3/5, Mdk 10, FlavorOfTheWeek
Posts: 77

Rep: Reputation: 15
Question Thinclient or shared filesystem?


My girlfriend just moved in, an brought her virus-infected windows computer with her. Obviously, this would not do.

My solution is to (obviously) put Linux on her machine, and convert all of her .wma music files to MP3 or OGG. That is the easy part.

Now, she wants to keep the data that she has on MY machine, and be able to access the same music. Since both machines will be running the same distro, my thought is that my machine has more storage, and we should just use it (860 GiB to 80 GiB. . . hmmm) for file storage. This gives me two options. I can use NFS to mount my /home on her machine so that we can both lot into it, or I can set up a thinclient and use a remote login via GDM. I would like some feedback, both have some advantages and disadvantages to me.

I'm asking for a gig-e switch and adapter for Christmas, and if I don't get it, I'll buy it. This eliminates a lot of the lag issues I expect either way.

Can the community give me some feedback so I can make a more informed decision?

I appreciate it, thank you in advance.
 
Old 12-01-2006, 03:04 PM   #2
acid_kewpie
Moderator
 
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 43,398

Rep: Reputation: 1965Reputation: 1965Reputation: 1965Reputation: 1965Reputation: 1965Reputation: 1965Reputation: 1965Reputation: 1965Reputation: 1965Reputation: 1965Reputation: 1965
if the client machine is a generally decent spec, then from my perspective you may as well use it properly. depending on how you use your machines, you'd end up sharing a single cpu for whatever you want to do, which can be nasty if she wants to rip a dvd or something. There are a number of other niggles though that could easily influence your decision, like what about sound? currently mine and my wifes computer connect to a kvm. but we only have one pair of speakers so are continually swapping the jack back an forth...

might be worth floating another option though... what about a network boot? you can share your standard file systems with the other PC, but make their machine actually do the work after the machine is booted. one install to manage software on, but if the boxes are similar enough then there's the ability to run two instances without issue.

you don't need a gig switch for two desktops... can you not ask for a wii or a roboraptor instead?
 
Old 12-01-2006, 11:54 PM   #3
livewire98801
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Distribution: Fedora 3/5, Mdk 10, FlavorOfTheWeek
Posts: 77

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Network boot. . . this is causing a tickle in my brain, but I'm not sure exactly what you mean. Can I set my server up to respond to a PXE boot request or something?

The systems are both reasonably modern, but use different hardware. Will this present driver issues? I've never worked with network booting before. . . I will research this myself, but if you could point me in the right direction, that would be great.

The gig-e switch and adapter is on the list of several things, incl a Wii. . . and a new truck :-D
 
Old 12-02-2006, 04:06 AM   #4
acid_kewpie
Moderator
 
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 43,398

Rep: Reputation: 1965Reputation: 1965Reputation: 1965Reputation: 1965Reputation: 1965Reputation: 1965Reputation: 1965Reputation: 1965Reputation: 1965Reputation: 1965Reputation: 1965
you can configure a pxe server to pass boot details back for a tftp server to deliver a boot kernel and root filesystem details. you can then get the "client" to boot without using a disk at all, instead running off of the single installation on the "server" pro's and con's in both directions, and this would be tricky to work out perfectly, but in essnece you should be able to run one installation of fedora on two machines in the main. you'd want to take a seperate /etc/, and things like swap would be different too, indeed you'd probably do without swap i guess, but it's possible.
 
Old 12-03-2006, 01:53 AM   #5
livewire98801
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Distribution: Fedora 3/5, Mdk 10, FlavorOfTheWeek
Posts: 77

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Would this solution give me driver problems? My server is an ASUS AMD board, and hers is an Intel P4, they use different video chipsets as well (I'm using the proprietary NVIDIA driver on mine).

Looks like it might be more trouble than it's worth for THIS project, but I'm going to be playing with this on my testbeds soon
 
Old 12-03-2006, 02:47 AM   #6
acid_kewpie
Moderator
 
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 43,398

Rep: Reputation: 1965Reputation: 1965Reputation: 1965Reputation: 1965Reputation: 1965Reputation: 1965Reputation: 1965Reputation: 1965Reputation: 1965Reputation: 1965Reputation: 1965
not really driver problems, if you have a separate copy of etc, as drivers are generally loaded and recognised dynamically at boot. you can put a linux drive into a totally different box and it's likely to boot without much complaining, maybe other than silly things like mice. i remeber moving win98 drives between boxes and it'd find a new south bridge, ide bus, pci bus etc... rebooting each time. this info isn't stored under linux anywhere, it's just picked up on each boot.

having voiced this approach, i wouldn't necessarily say it's the best... just wanted to put forward a solution that would sit somewhere between a thin client and a full system. if i had this scenario i think i'd go for the full client install.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Windows / Linux shared filesystem? corfe Linux - General 8 08-22-2006 11:52 PM
Adding a shared filesystem to a dual boot Rawr101 Linux - General 5 01-01-2006 09:17 AM
Shared Filesystem w/ 2 hard drives W0bbles Linux - General 2 12-23-2005 10:37 AM
Shared Filesystem over SCSI porzer Linux - Hardware 1 04-13-2005 05:49 PM
Which filesystem should I use for drives shared by Samba? Pcghost Linux - General 4 10-13-2003 08:38 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:05 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration