| Fedora This forum is for the discussion of the Fedora Project. |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
04-29-2009, 09:13 AM
|
#1
|
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2008
Location: Canada
Distribution: Vector Linux 6.0
Posts: 41
Rep:
|
Should I use Fedora on an older computer?
Hello again. I have been using Ubuntu 7.04 for just over a year now, and I have noticed that it is getting a bit old (it's getting hard to find packages, for example). I am looking to upgrade, but my concern is that I have found Ubuntu to run a little slower than I expected. I have it installed on an older machine, so I am looking to find a distro that will run well on it with minimal sluggishness. I read that a liveCD installation of Fedora might work well, but I am not sure. If anyone has any advice about how well Fedora 10 would work on an older computer (or if I should keep looking), I would appreciate it. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
04-29-2009, 09:18 AM
|
#2
|
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: UnitedKingdom
Distribution: Debian Lenny
Posts: 351
Rep:
|
Fedora
Pros:
latest. Has good support.
Cons:
slow
Debian:
Pros:
fast and configurable
very large user grou
cons:
stable versions are not bleeding-edge latest but are a bit old
I would recommend debian (which is the parent of ubuntu). So in case you feel u want a system which is fast and more
responsive go for debian (lenny/sid). In case you feel you need easy configuration and things to work out-of-the-box
then go for the latest version of ubuntu.
I am sure may of the people here may have different opinions. I am not starting a flame here !!!
|
|
|
|
04-29-2009, 10:26 AM
|
#3
|
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2008
Distribution: Debian SID Xfce
Posts: 40
Rep:
|
It might help to know what type of computer you are running... If it is an older computer I am assuming that it is slower and underpowered meaning that you would be looking for a "lighter" desktop environment. You could keep your current OS if you are comfortable with it and just switch to a smaller desktop manager. I run Xfce on a 3 gig hard drive and it is extremely fast and responsive. Look up either Xubuntu, Debian w/ Xfce, or openSUSE with Xfce. I tried Fedora before and didn't like it.
|
|
|
|
04-29-2009, 10:38 AM
|
#4
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2006
Location: India
Distribution: Fedora
Posts: 1,562
Rep:
|
|
|
|
|
04-29-2009, 10:46 AM
|
#5
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jul 2006
Location: Kolkata, India
Distribution: 64-bit GNU/Linux, Kubuntu64, Fedora QA, Slackware,
Posts: 2,717
Rep: 
|
For older computers with <512 MB RAM, Vector Linux is best. Other possibilities: XFCE things mentioned above or LXDE ones (for <128 MB RAM)
|
|
|
|
04-29-2009, 01:12 PM
|
#6
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,362
Rep: 
|
Probably the major issue with running Fedora would be that each version is only supported for 13 months. After that their are no official updates of any kind. One of the reasons that Fedora is sometimes called slow is that a default install has tons of extra stuff running. Half of which most users will never use. You can shut off a lot of this and see a significant speed upgrade.
If you have 512 ram or more and are looking for long term support, I would look at Centos. Centos is RHEL(Red Hat Enterprise Linux) with the logos removed and is binary compatible with RHEL(made from same source code). It is free to download/update (unlike RHEL) and has a five year (plus) support life. It does suffer the same problem as Fedora in that everything but the kitchen sink is turned on in a default install.
|
|
|
|
05-01-2009, 05:38 PM
|
#7
|
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2008
Location: Canada
Distribution: Vector Linux 6.0
Posts: 41
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Thanks guys, the PC I'm talking about has about 300 MB of RAM, so I think I'll have to go with something else. I hear Xubuntu is good for this situation, or perhaps openSUSE. Thanks again!
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:20 AM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|