LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Fedora
User Name
Password
Fedora This forum is for the discussion of the Fedora Project.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 05-23-2006, 03:31 PM   #1
mp55
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Distribution: Fedora 7
Posts: 32

Rep: Reputation: 15
scim dependency discrepancy on libstdc++-20060203.so.7


I tried to install scim using yum a few days ago but I got the error message
Error: Missing Dependency: libstdc++-20060203.so.7
I checked the system and actually a newer package libstdc++so7-4.2.0-0.3.20060428 has been installed on the system.

I tried it again today and scim was successfully installed, so looks like they have fixed this problem. But when I try to install an input method like scim-fcitx or scim-pinyin, I still got the same error message. Any one got this problem too? or have any idea how to go around with it? I downloaded the source packag of scim-fcitx but it complains scim version >= 1.2 is not installed, while I have scim 1.4.4 on my system.

I'm running FC5 with repos extra and livna.

Any advice is appreciated.
 
Old 05-23-2006, 04:32 PM   #2
David the H.
Bash Guru
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Osaka, Japan
Distribution: Arch + Xfce
Posts: 6,852

Rep: Reputation: 2037Reputation: 2037Reputation: 2037Reputation: 2037Reputation: 2037Reputation: 2037Reputation: 2037Reputation: 2037Reputation: 2037Reputation: 2037Reputation: 2037
If YUM is anything like Debian, then you'll occasionally come across situations like this. An upgraded package will sometimes appear in the repository some time before the libraries it depends on do. Often you'll have one pivotal package holding back multiple other programs. Usually you only have to wait a day or so, but it can sometimes be a long wait before all the dependencies get in and you can actually install what you want.

I've also seen occasions where a newer library is rejected over an older one. If the newer library has undergone major changes, for example, the program might not be able to handle them, and you'll have to wait until they can bring out a version of the program able to use the new library.

I also suspect that in some cases packages are just stupid, and are simply not recognizing libraries for what they are because the version numbers lie outside their expected range. But I don't know if this is actually true.
 
Old 05-24-2006, 04:17 PM   #3
mp55
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Distribution: Fedora 7
Posts: 32

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Alright, guess I'll have to wait. I can not install it from source code anyway.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
x.org 6.9 discrepancy? bobbens Linux - Software 6 01-12-2006 06:17 AM
A/V speed discrepancy in mPlayer coldwater Linux - Software 2 11-12-2005 08:47 PM
Monitor refresh rate discrepancy. pcd007 Linux - Software 1 12-12-2004 12:19 AM
mismatched rpm versions of libstdc++ and libstdc++-devel pcweirdo Linux - Software 8 11-29-2004 09:30 AM
Server uptime discrepancy peppiv Linux - Software 2 05-17-2004 11:41 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Fedora

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:12 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration