Support LQ: Use code LQ3 and save $3 on Domain Registration
Go Back > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Fedora
User Name
Fedora This forum is for the discussion of the Fedora Project.


  Search this Thread
Old 07-05-2012, 12:44 AM   #1
Registered: May 2006
Location: Tennessee
Distribution: current, rawhide
Posts: 87

Rep: Reputation: 16
ntfs-3g question

Copied two ntfs partitions from the 500G system drive to partitions on an external drive with dd for backup so that the system drive could be restructured. With gparted the restructuring went without incident allowing the VISTA system drive to be enlarged as desired. A new data partition was created on the system drive. After transferring the data partition with dd from the external drive it could not be read by VISTA. VISTA disk manager shows both the partitions on the external drive and on the system drive as "raw"

Fedora sees the partitions as ntfs with no problem. The correct code for the partition shows from fdisk.

Formating the data partition with VISTA and using cpio from Fedora accomplished the task of restoring the data but left the question as to what is missing from the copy with dd that flags the partition as "raw" and is there any way to get it corrected. If there had been a problem with resizing the VISTA system partition it would be lost.

Robert McBroom
Old 07-05-2012, 01:21 AM   #2
LQ Guru
Registered: Mar 2012
Location: Hungary
Distribution: debian i686 (solaris)
Posts: 6,489

Rep: Reputation: 1764Reputation: 1764Reputation: 1764Reputation: 1764Reputation: 1764Reputation: 1764Reputation: 1764Reputation: 1764Reputation: 1764Reputation: 1764Reputation: 1764
theoretically ntfs can only be handled properly by native nt based os, all the linux implementations have some limitations, not all the original features were included. One of these missing features is the "handling" of such relocation - which is not supported by default. The ntfs-3g driver can handle it, but the original windows driver supposes some connection between the filesystem and the underlying hardware. In your case this assumption was not "fulfilled", so windows refused to handle it as a valid ntfs filesystem.


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NTFS question PeterBotes Linux - General 19 01-27-2012 12:46 PM
'Simple' NTFS Question Richard Rahl Linux - Hardware 5 08-03-2006 06:49 AM
Samba Question regarding NTFS and write 1kyle Linux - Software 1 11-02-2004 07:40 AM
FAT32/NTFS Question floyd Linux - General 4 05-13-2004 03:16 AM
Linux NTFS Partition Question migrax Linux - Software 5 05-07-2004 05:02 PM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:10 PM.

Main Menu
Write for LQ is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration