FedoraThis forum is for the discussion of the Fedora Project.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I recently decided to install F9 on a 40gb partition and I noticed during installation, it wanted to create some LVM volumes. I decided to abort the installation for the time being.
The 160gb drive already has Debian and Win Vista installed, so I just wanted to give the 40gb partition to F9 and use the same swap as Debian.
What is the purpose of LVM? In all my linux days, this is the first time I've seen any distro wanting to do this.
Just curious about it and what are some of the benefits of having it.
LVM just gives you more options for flexibility. you can much more easily resize disk volumes, add new ones, spread a single filesystem over multiple disks etc... without adding real partitions on your disk, which could well piss windows off and such.
By default there probably looks to be a negligible benefit for a basic installation, but if it was scaled up it often starts to become extremely useful.
Unless you need to contiguously span several disks, LVM is not worth the headaches it can create. If something goes wrong LVM can be a royal PITA to work with for recovery. You can achieve most of the same advantages of LVM by simply placing the mount point of the next drive within a general access area of the first drive. Except for drives that have huge amounts of data moving in and out daily I avoid LVM like the plague.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.